Talk:Evergreen Branch

Evergreen Branch has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 23, 2018. (Reviewed version).

Trains: in New York City Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject New York City Public Transportation (assessed as Low-importance).

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Evergreen Branch/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: 1.02 editor (talk · contribs) 09:39, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this review, expect comments within a few days 1.02 editor (C651 set 217/218) 09:39, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Review[edit]

It is mentioned in the lead that the line at its fullest extent, ran between X and Y. When was this 'fullest extent' achieved or was there a shorter route?
- I hope that this clarifies it. "With passenger service over, the remainder of the line between South Side Crossing and Cooper Avenue became exclusively used for freight"--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 21:04, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
infobox picture- which one is the branch?
- I hope that I clarified it. --Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 21:09, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The etymology section is a bit vague, some timeframes would help clarify.
- I did the best I could concerning the name change to Evergreen. I looked in the Brooklyn Daily Eagle for the first mention of the commnity of Evergreen, and this is what I found.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 21:42, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
route description- overly vivid description here, please cut down on things that is not the line (eg: depots, sidings...)

Done

"The origin of the......on 26 March, 1874, to build [what?] from Quay street...

Done

"the lines construction would have necessitated the closure of the Evergreen branch". Why?

Done

"on February 9, 8 pieces of track..." how much is that?

Done

traces of the line- is this necessary? Sounds like trivia which is discouraged.

Done

hold[edit]

I have finished reviewing the article and have identified some issues, and you'll have 7 days to address these issues. Thanks. 1.02 editor (C651 set 217/218) 11:16, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All the issues have been addressed and i am satisfied with the current state of the article. Passing. 1.02 editor (C651 set 217/218) 00:32, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@1.02 editor: You didn't mark the article as passing yet.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 20:24, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Map[edit]

@BMACS1002: Thanks for adding the map, though it should only be to Cooper Avenue. Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 23:41, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]