Talk:Communist Unity Movement of the Netherlands (Marxist–Leninist)

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles

Socialism

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Politics

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was move. -- tariqabjotu 00:33, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

Rationale: Unclear why this was moved. On nl wiki it is claimed that KEN, not KEN(ml), was the original name of the group (until the 1972 split). However, I've not found any info that that would be the case. However, in any case, KEN(ml) was the name used during the latter long period of its existance, and that is the approriate title for the article. — --Soman 09:32, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Poll[edit]

Support. Doesn't make much sense to me, but that seems to be the most familiar name to those who would write related articles and link here. Kafziel 12:59, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comments[edit]

Comment: Was there a Communist Unity Movement of the Netherlands that wasn't Marxist/Leninist? If not, I'm unclear on the need to be so overly specific with the title. Kafziel 12:48, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment KEN(ml) was the name of the organization (at least 1972-1985). --Soman 12:52, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Fair use rationale for Image:Kenml.jpg[edit]

Image:Kenml.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:33, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]