Talk:Central Park be-ins

Anti-war Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anti-war, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the anti-war movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anti-warWikipedia:WikiProject Anti-warTemplate:WikiProject Anti-warAnti-war articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Total cleanup needed

Additions by an earlier editor, while generally appropriate, adopted a footnoting convention that will require extensive editing to bring the Be-In article up to WP standards. As they stand now, the article's citations use numbers within square brackets (for example, [2]) that do not relate to the current References section. To rectify this, the edit history has to be researched and standard in-line cites need to be re-constructed from the past material. Meanwhile, given the information and quality of writing, I'm not sure this is worth the effort. Allreet (talk) 23:45, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As they stand now, the article's citations use numbers within square brackets (for example, [2]) that do not relate to the current References section. Prospect Park be-in needs to be added. To rectify this, the edit history has to be researched and standard in-line cites need to be re-constructed from the past material. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.2.61.8 (talk) 15:37, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]