Jump to content

Talk:Brittany Luse

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Status of draft?

[edit]

@Innisfree987: Forgive the intrusion, but I was searching for Brittany Luse and came across your draft. From my perspective, it looks to be in great shape and ready to go, just curious why you haven't published it yet? I haven't done any research myself, but I would gladly offer help if you thought anything was needed? Either way, awesome article! Thanks! CaptainAngus (talk) 01:17, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh thanks for the ping @CaptainAngus—I had been thinking to do a little more work and just haven’t had a lot of time, but I’m glad you think it’s in good shape! Sure in that case I’ll move it and further work can happen in mainspace. Thanks for reviewing it for me, and for the message! Innisfree987 (talk) 06:46, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I think the entry is already long enough to be DYK-eligible—by chance do any details jump out at you @CaptainAngus as "hooky" enough for that purpose? Would be happy to share the nom! Innisfree987 (talk) 06:54, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Innisfree987: Here are one or two suggestions, what do you think?
  • DYK... that Brittany Luse's podcast The Nod has been praised for its exploration of "the diversity and richness of the Black experience"?
  • DYK... that Brittany Luse's podcast The Nod, which explores Black culture, received a higher degree of scrutiny and skepticism from its own production company?
The second one needs some work, but hopefully you get what I'm going for, pointing out that degree of inherent irony. I'll see if I can think of any others? CaptainAngus (talk) 13:21, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think the first one could work! Thank you! I’ll get it started and you want you can add more hooks? Innisfree987 (talk) 03:01, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm good with it too! We'll see what feedback it gets. CaptainAngus (talk) 14:50, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hey man im josh talk 16:34, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Innisfree987 (talk) and CaptainAngus (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 37 past nominations.

Innisfree987 (talk) 03:03, 26 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • @Innisfree987 and CaptainAngus: New enough (from draft) and long enough. QPQ present. Hook fact checks out and is interesting. My concern is that I think there are too many quotes in the critical reception section, although one or two would work well. Consider shortening a number of quotes and cutting/paraphrasing a few. I'd like to see that fixed before promoting the page. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 04:00, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sammi Brie, I have added a sentence of summary and replaced one quote and portions of two more with paraphrasing. Innisfree987 (talk) 01:07, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]