Talk:BAC Concorde G-BBDG

Any photographs on this airframe? And when do schedluled services begin 8^) --Jumbo 03:58, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Not clear: "There were some differences between this aircraft and the final production aircraft, such as a thinner fuselage skin" -Which had the thinner skin?84.71.166.97 (talk) 11:33, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge ?

As none of the other concorde aircraft have an article, should this not be merged into Concorde aircraft histories with all the others? MilborneOne 20:57, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge? NOT really

Reading: the article makes it clear that it is about the story of THIS airplane especially the restoration part (and the call to give money). Impression: read more like a tearbreaker than real news. Value: local significance. Bottom line: keep it. Dilane 16:40, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article not neutral

Hi everyone. Well, I support every effort that's being put into restoring this unique aircraft, but please keep in mind that this is an encyclopedia and language in its articles must be neutral. I find this one is NOT neutral, especially the last paragraphs. May someone rewrite it? Thank you Cvalda 02:41, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The offending passages seem to have been removed, so I have deleted the {{POV check}} tag. Pyrop e 07:31, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

not significant? A US-centric view =

The first British Concorde is hugely significant over here. No reason at all why this should be considered insignificant. --92.233.117.23 (talk) 22:41, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]