Jump to content

Talk:Ashford International Studios

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 (talk14:59, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Ritchie333 (talk). Self-nominated at 13:24, 22 June 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Ashford International Studios; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article meets eligibility requirements. No concerns with copyvio. QPQ done. Can the editor have a look at the article structure. The entire article is under the "History" section. At the minimum that can be edited. Anything that can be done to expand the article? Re: the hook, I want to defer to the nominator to see if this is the most interesting fact? If there is a way to tweak the hook, I think that would be good. Handing it back to the nominator. Ktin (talk) 18:50, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can't think of anything else to cite from the sources in the article (a search for others returns information already present) and I can't think of a more suitable hook. As time passes, the article should be expanded once the studios open and production ramps up, but Wikipedia isn't a crystal ball so we can't add anything like that at present. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:04, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Marking this approved with two points of note. a) Deferring to the nominator on the interestingness of this hook. b) Not a fan of the entire article under the "history" head. Seems like that part can definitely be improved. Irrespective, I am marking this approved with the above observations. Good to go. Ktin (talk) 02:38, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]