Related changes
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
17 May 2024
- diffhist Chibcha language 21:30 −1,256 Fdom5997 talk contribs (Info for phonology is already cited. Now quit tampering around with the page and adding contradicting sources.)
- diffhist Chibcha language 21:26 +1,239 Fdom5997 talk contribs (Undid revision 1224266358 by 94.73.32.9 (talk) wrong.) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Chibcha language 21:12 −3,250 Fdom5997 talk contribs (Undid revision 1224266621 by 94.73.32.9 (talk) yes, but these are not the latest sources) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Chibcha language 21:11 −1,363 Fdom5997 talk contribs (Undid revision 1224270222 by 94.73.32.9 (talk)) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Module:Navbox 21:07 +308 Izno talk contribs (per Template talk:Navbox#Night mode may need explicit color definitions)
- diffhist Chibcha language 09:26 +1,363 94.73.32.9 talk (→Proposal by Adelaar & Muysken) Tags: Reverted harv-error references removed
- diffhist Chibcha language 08:42 +3,250 94.73.32.9 talk (Undid revision 1224237919 by Fdom5997 (talk) Answer: Constenla, González and Adelaar with Muysken, are authors who have published their proposals in accredited publications and serious institutions, University of Pennsylvania, Cambriage University and Instituto Caro y Cuervo.) Tags: Undo Reverted
- diffhist Chibcha language 08:39 −1,239 94.73.32.9 talk (Undid revision 1224237807 by Fdom5997 (talk) No. These are not the best proposals. The best proposals are those of Constenla and Adelaar with Muysken.) Tags: Undo Reverted
- diffhist Chibcha language 02:56 −3,250 Fdom5997 talk contribs (No that is not important. This section used the proposed phonology from the best sources, Gonzalez (2006) and Saravia (2015)) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Chibcha language 02:55 +1,239 Fdom5997 talk contribs (→Phonology: no that is not important. This section used the proposed phonology from the best sources, Gonzalez (2006) and Saravia (2015)) Tag: Reverted
16 May 2024
- diffhist Chibcha language 18:51 +1 94.73.32.9 talk (→Phonology)
- diffhist Chibcha language 18:49 +27 94.73.32.9 talk (→Phonology)
- diffhist Chibcha language 18:47 +3,244 94.73.32.9 talk (It is important to note that different phonologies have been proposed over time.)
- diffhist Pea 14:15 0 Autisticeditor 20 talk contribs (lowercase #article-section-source-editor) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit
- diffhist Module:Pagetype 12:25 −146 MSGJ talk contribs (add detection of non-existent pages, some code simplication)
- diffhist m Module:Pagetype/config 12:23 +100 MSGJ talk contribs (+cfg for non-existent pages)
- diffhist Time zone 11:41 +7 Belbury talk contribs (MOS:IMAGESIZE max is 1.35 for lead)
- diffhist m El Dorado 10:44 −30 DrakonsOrSnakes talk contribs (→El Dorado in popular culture: El dorado by Stellar was listed twice, the second one with the songs released in 2023, while it was made in 2021.) Tags: Manual revert Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit
- diffhist Chibcha language 09:53 −2 94.73.32.9 talk (Undid revision 1224068316 by Zaquezipe (talk) Answer: The constructed languages are mostly based on pre-existing grammar and vocabulary, such as ApI Interlingua, which is absolutely based on classical Latin.) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Chibcha language 01:39 +2 Zaquezipe talk contribs (→The Myska language: Still not appropriate to call it a “constructed language” as in fictional as it was created with the base of colonial Chibcha.) Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
15 May 2024
- diffhist Chibcha language 21:01 +5 94.73.32.9 talk (Undid revision 1224021626 by Zaquezipe (talk) Answer: There is a huge difference between "reviving a language" and "revitalizing a language." Revival occurs in cases where there are no native speakers, while revitalization occurs when a dying language is encouraged and promoted so that it does not die. In the case of chibcha all attempts at revival are constructions from the present.) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Chibcha language 19:49 −5 Zaquezipe talk contribs (→The Myska language: A constructed language is a completely original language not made based off of another, this does not fit the term.) Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- diffhist Chibcha language 19:49 +341 94.73.32.9 talk
- diffhist Chibcha language 19:41 +22 94.73.32.9 talk
- diffhist Chibcha language 19:39 +593 94.73.32.9 talk
- diffhist Chibcha language 17:56 −54 Zaquezipe talk contribs (Not supported by the cite, cite doesn’t work.) Tags: Manual revert Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- diffhist Chibcha language 10:00 +54 94.73.32.9 talk Tag: Reverted
- diffhist m Potato 02:24 +74 Reimeille talk contribs (→Toxicity: closing parenthesis) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist El Dorado 01:30 +30 2600:1016:b11f:9524:20ff:5bd2:6fbf:c983 talk (→Music: Added a song) Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Disambiguation links added
14 May 2024
- diffhist Chibcha language 19:53 +6 Zaquezipe talk contribs Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- diffhist El Dorado 17:05 −102 Joyous! talk contribs (Reverted good faith edits by 2600:1009:B051:E51:E166:751F:E1A3:7B8E (talk): Song is already listed) Tags: Twinkle Undo
- diffhist El Dorado 17:01 +102 2600:1009:b051:e51:e166:751f:e1a3:7b8e talk Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Chibcha language 12:11 −43 94.73.32.9 talk (Undid revision 1223789223 by Zaquezipe (talk) Answer: What is the basis for the claim that the revitalization initiatives are very close to the original? The question is clear. Are there native speakers or not? Do not delete reasoned information and quotes.) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Chibcha language 10:59 −1 Zaquezipe talk contribs (→Alphabet and rough pronunciation) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- diffhist Chibcha language 10:58 +43 Zaquezipe talk contribs (There are still various revitalization initiatives based on this language that are very close to it and it should be mentioned here, stop deleting information.) Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- diffhist m El Dorado 10:14 0 Brifyjek talk contribs
- diffhist Chibcha language 06:20 −43 94.73.32.9 talk (Undid revision 1223721512 by Zaquezipe (talk) Answer: Any attempt at revitalization cannot be compared with any native speakers, but only with incomplete documents produced by non-native speakers. It is a fallacy to say that it is the same language.) Tag: Undo
13 May 2024
- diffhist Chibcha language 22:49 +43 Zaquezipe talk contribs (Still has to do with native speakers, I don’t know why you are so keen on deleting information from the article and presenting the revitalized version as a completely different language when it literally takes Muisca scripts from the colonial period) Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- diffhist Chibcha language 21:02 −25 94.73.32.9 talk (Undid revision 1223704573 by Zaquezipe (talk) Review what a native speaker is. The table asks if there are native speakers, and Chibcha has no native speakers.) Tag: Undo
- diffhist m Chibcha language 20:37 +25 Zaquezipe talk contribs (You seem to forget that it’s also being revitalízales with that version having a few speakers) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Chibcha language 20:30 +4 94.73.32.9 talk
- diffhist Chibcha language 20:28 +145 94.73.32.9 talk
- diffhist Chibcha language 20:16 +67 94.73.32.9 talk (According to Glotolog, the complete reference database of the world's languages is an extinct language.) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Chibcha language 20:13 −67 Zaquezipe talk contribs (It isn’t completely dead and still being revitalized, the revitalized language literally takes chibcha documents from the colonial period.) Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- diffhist Chibcha language 20:11 +1 Zaquezipe talk contribs Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- diffhist Chibcha language 19:00 −164 94.73.32.9 talk (If so, then this is NOT chibcha, but a constructed language. Furthermore, there are at least three competing revitalization processes. Which one is more legitimate than the other?) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Chibcha language 18:45 +164 Fdom5997 talk contribs (Undid revision 1223682096 by 94.73.32.9 (talk) answer: because it has been revitalized) Tags: Undo Reverted
- diffhist Chibcha language 17:44 −164 94.73.32.9 talk (If Chibcha is officially a language that has been extinct for several centuries, how can there be an audio?) Tags: Undo Reverted
- diffhist Chibcha language 14:49 +164 Fdom5997 talk contribs (Undid revision 1223643417 by 94.73.32.9 (talk) citation needed) Tags: Undo Reverted
- diffhist Chibcha language 13:03 −164 94.73.32.9 talk (This audio is fake) Tags: Manual revert Reverted