User talk:Drmies: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 396: Line 396:


[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_adminship/Daffy123&diff=903011066&oldid=903009996 Mr. Reputable].--[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 23:10, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_adminship/Daffy123&diff=903011066&oldid=903009996 Mr. Reputable].--[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 23:10, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
*Well deserved, of course. [[User:Usedtobecool]], my reputable days are over, but that's OK. To answer one of your questions, Eric C. and I go back a long time, we have written together, including some things that we are still proud of. That Eric would possibly violate a topic ban isn't necessarily something I need to involve myself in: he is probably the most-watched editor on Wikipedia, and as you saw was dragged to arbitration immediately. Plus, I hadn't seen him in a while--and seeing an old friend again is always a cause for you. When you get to be our age you'll appreciate that more, perhaps. Thanks Bbb--you know I am always happy to see your comments. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies#top|talk]]) 00:57, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:57, 23 June 2019

Note to self

Category:Articles with a promotional tone from December 2017

Nadolig Llawen a Blwyddyn Newydd Dda

Merry Christmas !!!

CAPTAIN RAJU(T) is wishing you a Merry Christmas!

This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

You can help Drmies retain that youth cred, lurkers.

… and you can have the kudos of doing better than I did, too, for whatever that is worth. ☺

We don't want xyr fellow youths to find Drmies editing any more articles about very dead people, especially very dead people where Doktoro has to consider the moral qualities and large muscular person (and indeed sweet voice and missing teeth) of a man that Joseph Cooper Walker had never met and credited a "friend" for knowledge thereof. Doktoro does not need such stimulation at xyr age.Doktoro's fellow youths do not rispec' knowing the teeth of very dead people, and rispec' from one's peer group is important. Doktoro is neither friend of Walker nor Dorothy.

So gently guide Dr mi estas away, and shield xyr eyes; and please find a historian who does not simply regurgitate a clearly unreliable 18th century memoir. You might observe that I have found a clearly annoyed Ulsterman that doesn't like the memoir, and quite a lot of people over the centuries that have plagiarized it without attribution. So the bar is rather higher than an off-handed Google Books search now. Those of you with High Beaming, Tex-Mex Lexus, JSTORrery, and the like might care to use your exceptional capabilities.

Uncle G (talk) 10:46, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There was once a collector named Ralph, who had a Bronze horn on a shelf. —

— He said to his son, "Look what we've done! —

— I'll not keep the news to myself."

Maybe someone else will have more Limericks for Doktoro. Uncle G (talk) 18:41, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Very nicely done, Uncle. Bravo, and thank you. Drmies (talk) 21:41, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
There once was a man from Nantucket
Whose work was so fine that he stuck it.
He just said, counting stars,
As he sat on his arse,
"If it's nommed for delete, I'll say file a complaint at AN/I, thanks!"
Martinevans123 (talk) 18:58, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An Ulsterman named Francis Bigger …

It is because you like Limericks. So there were three Limericks for you. Uncle G (talk) 00:53, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This one is huge. The lurkers might want to chip in here. I've given you a good substub. But there's no mention of Roddy McCorley, the granite block of St Patrick, the Gaelic football club, the Irish Folk Song Society, the Irish Peasant Home Industries, the Belfast Art Society, or the Irish Decorative Art Association. Uncle G (talk) 00:53, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

… once went to school, and had a granddad.

The Ulster Literary Theatre has bypassed Articles for creation, because it was about plays and writing and history and stuff, and no-one is interested in that here. I argued that Doktoro might be tricked into it if it were misrepresented as popular culture … of 1909, having xem think that it would help that youth cred, but failed to make the case. Uncle G (talk) 03:46, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Ha, so I saw that the day after you put it up! I did see it. No, biographies are my favorite, as everyone knows, and dead Irish people, well, it just doesn't get better than that. Drmies (talk) 20:24, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Course correction

No, no, no, Doktoro! If you want the youth cred then you need to focus upon finding sources for Jada Facer (AfD discussion) not very dead priests. Do not even let the fact that those of us without all of that High Beaming, Tex-Mex Lexus, and JSTORrery cannot read the likes of doi:10.2307/29740597, whereas you can, distract you. Nor http://allhallows.ie/cms/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/The-Missionary.pdf . Nor even David Bigger and Robert Magill Young. Uncle G (talk) 09:27, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Look, Uncle, I'm not trying to get youth cred here--I get plenty of that when I wear my Migos shirt to class. I happen to have an interest in missionizing; the Irish have been at it for over a millennium, and if I ever drag myself away from Wikipedia I'll be writing about German missionaries in Africa. Drmies (talk) 16:25, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • That's sad: my JSTOR lite doesn't have that journal. Drmies (talk) 16:28, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Careful

The wikified law of 22 Prairial can be directed at typo fixers too, you know  :) ——SerialNumber54129 18:13, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Adriaan de Bruin

On 13 June 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Adriaan de Bruin, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Adriaan de Bruin was enslaved in Africa but ended up in Hoorn in the Dutch Republic, where he married a local woman and ran a tobacco shop? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Adriaan de Bruin. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Adriaan de Bruin), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent stats for a good one! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:47, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Holy moly, Gerda Arendt--thanks for all your help! Drmies (talk) 13:44, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
moar moly: the young Nepalese human rights' activist which you helped also made the stats, and guess what, even a dancer praised by Max Brod who (the dancer) had a tough life due to the Nazi regime. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:27, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I saw that. Ha, Wikipedia is not for activism--but still. Drmies (talk) 19:57, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Words in Foreign

If fr:Les Cent Contes drolatiques#Études is anything to go by, we are missing Les Cent Contes drolatiques. What we lack is a French Professor. Uncle G (talk) 00:28, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • We used to have one (or, a student at least)--I forgot their name. Drmies (talk) 01:14, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ha, what are the odds? Today I had a copy of the Decamerone in my hand, the Norton Critical Edition. Drmies (talk) 01:17, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • You know, I wouldn't mind writing that up if I actually read the book. Drmies (talk) 01:23, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Drmies, Hope you're well! As real life & the backstage wiki are just tooo exciting at the moment, I've been taking a look at these - like all our basic tableware articles they are pretty shit. So, in American, is there a minimum size for a pitcher? What do Americans call the little milk jugs in a tea set or at a restaurant?

I've also recently got to know about the charming Dutch Maiden (Nederlandse Maagd), after starting (yup, gulp) Personification, and adding to the riduculously-named Liberty (goddess), a relative of the Maiden. I bet there's a lot more to say on these, if you feel like it. Johnbod (talk) 15:15, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe a creamer or just a pitcher. Geoff | Who, me? 15:48, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see little milk jugs here: Americans are too obsessed with GERMS and whatnot. At Starbuck's and such places they keep the milk/cream (really, half and half) in thermos bottles that hold maybe three or four cups. At many other occasions it's just powdered stuff--I know, barbaric. I'd say something isn't a pitcher unless it holds at least a quart, and I think it must have a wide top, so you can stir the lemonade or sweet tea. A jug, isn't that something with an ear? Shaped like a gourd? As for Dutch maidens, besides my mother and aunts I know only one: Frau Antje. Shame I never got that on the front page. Drmies (talk) 16:33, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pitcher (container) and Jug should be merged into a single article on containers for serving beverages. bd2412 T 16:47, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with bd2412 here. The articles are redundant as heck. Wikipedia articles are about concepts, not words, and it's largely the same type of container. The only real difference is that they're all called jugs in the UK, while the US call one with a large top opening a pitcher (and thereby the use of "jug" implies a smaller opening like a milk jug or growler.) still not enough to need two articles. oknazevad (talk) 16:59, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! A merge is an option, especially as ewer goes to American jugs. Creamer could join them, with cow creamer kept apart. Johnbod (talk) 17:20, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you all. See, collaborative editing can work. Drmies (talk) 04:14, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That would be all fine and dandy except …

Two changes in form may be noted. […] The second is the change from the spouted pitcher to the medieval jug.
— Cherry, John (1991). "Pottery and Tile". In Blair, W. John (ed.). English Medieval Industries: Craftsmen, Techniques, Products. A&C Black. p. 205. ISBN 9780907628873. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)

That is from a chapter of an English book by someone who used to be keeper of Medieval and Later Antiquities in the British Museum, talking about Stamford Ware. Xyr statement would not make sense if there were no technical difference in U.K. English between a pitcher and a jug. Uncle G (talk) 23:55, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail

Hello, Drmies. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Doug Weller talk 17:08, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Doug, I'm wondering if our email server doesn't simply have problems with gmail accounts. I've emailed the head for ITS, and the helpdesk, but haven't heard back yet. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 19:55, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nah. I get too many e-mail I don't want for such problems to exist. Of course, I don't what kind of problems you're talking about, but lately I barely know what anyone is talking about. BTW, I have a nasty sore throat. Fix it! --Bbb23 (talk) 15:47, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Calling me a poof doesn't help.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:09, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
lets see if some pixie dust will help. I hope you get to feeling better soon Bbb23. MarnetteD|Talk 18:25, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 01:59, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Is it a bagless English Professor Vacuum?

If I mention this here, at the very eye of the cyclone that is attempting to suck the English Professors in, they will circle around it and never be able to reach it. Books being blown around by the English Professor Vacuum are a dangerous thing, anyway. They could hit someone. Uncle G (talk) 13:42, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

COI/sockpuppet account

Hi, I see you've edited the Seth Abramson page and reverted poorly sourced puffery from the page in the past. I strongly suspect that the account SanFran55 is a COI account or a sockpuppet of this account[1]. This account exclusively adds poorly sourced puffery to the Abramson page, as well as attempts to remove RS content which does not reflect well on Abramson (e.g. his conspiracy theorizing). Is this something you can look into? Snooganssnoogans (talk) 18:25, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • In principle yes, but I've edited the article a bit just now, and it's probably more useful to ping the ones who were active on the SPI; I think CU was run, and maybe there's a record... Sorry, dinner time now! Drmies (talk) 22:51, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What to do now?

For the past week or so Joseroyal has my attention. He comes up with rather useless edits. I went to the whole process of giving advice and giving warnings, but he seems totally unresponsive. Besides adding pre and post nominals to articles, he also adds unused fields to infoboxes, often just with the value "m". And today he started removing valid red links.

I can go on with bluntly reverting him, but I doubt that he will learn anything from that. Do you have any trick in the book to get the attention of the person behind the account? The Banner talk 08:35, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Changing Jesuit high schools, and trade schools, into universities seems to be systematic and not a passing thing. Uncle G (talk) 09:21, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • OK but what's so bad here? Anthony Raj is indeed the current principal, according to the website. I don't see problems with the infobox parameters--and Uncle, maybe they changed the infobox template because they were looking for some parameters that weren't in the other one? They do appear to be totally uncommunicative, and that's a bad thing; that, combined with the edit warring and the repeated warnings for those nominals, is highly disruptive. I think you can tell them that, and such continued disruption will lead to a block. Drmies (talk) 14:41, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding sandbox page deletion

Just saw the communication by your authority. I have read the links attached. I wish to add that I am a learner and not a paid editor. I am also not Shripad Vaidya. As per the guidelines received from you it is correct that article / page created by me in my user sandbox seems to be a resume rather than article. I will study other articles format and will change the info accordingly. Please not that I will never try to publish this article until and unless I correct all the points objected. But for that I need my written article back so as to get it corrected. It may take some time, may be few months, to complete it. Please guide how I can retrieve the article. MA$HRVA (User talk:MA$HRVA) Write Right!! 18:33, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Please ask the administrator who deleted it. Thanks. Drmies (talk) 00:10, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know …

… that when her doctor asked Patty Willis (AfD discussion) whether she could find his office she reportedly replied ″I landed a plane on Pico Boulevard, so I think I can find it with my car.″?

Uncle G (talk) 18:37, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) 1984?? Have you ever been to Pico Boulevard?--Bbb23 (talk) 00:53, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • ALT 1...that Patty Willis and her sister Betsy Howes Sergeant were willed "one-half of my real and all my internal personal estate" by her mother's nephew Eliakim Willis, who also left his "wearing apparel" to his brothers Ebenezer and Jireh Willis, "to be equally divided between them"?
  • ALT1a that in Malden, Massachusetts, the generation preceding Patty Willis apparently gave their menfolk names like Eliakim and Jireh? Drmies (talk) 00:52, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Those alternatives simply don't fly. Uncle G (talk) 09:00, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Aw come on. "Internal personal estate"? ITS A WINNER. Drmies (talk) 15:04, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Wikipedia does not need you, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Wikipedia does not need you and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Wikipedia does not need you during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. RL0919 (talk) 05:00, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Eliakim Doolittle at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 03:16, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations!

Mr. Reputable.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:10, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Well deserved, of course. User:Usedtobecool, my reputable days are over, but that's OK. To answer one of your questions, Eric C. and I go back a long time, we have written together, including some things that we are still proud of. That Eric would possibly violate a topic ban isn't necessarily something I need to involve myself in: he is probably the most-watched editor on Wikipedia, and as you saw was dragged to arbitration immediately. Plus, I hadn't seen him in a while--and seeing an old friend again is always a cause for you. When you get to be our age you'll appreciate that more, perhaps. Thanks Bbb--you know I am always happy to see your comments. Drmies (talk) 00:57, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]