User talk:Lieutenant of Melkor

RULES:

1. If you post here, I will reply here.
2. If I post on your talk page, please reply there. However, if you move the dialogue here, it will continue here.
3. Bear in mind, under talk page guidelines, except in rare circumstances, I have the right to remove your posts in their entirety, and, contrary to popular misinformation by poorly-worded policy, my removal of them does NOT immediately constitute my having read them; there is a convenient tool called pop-ups which allows the registered user to revert edits without having seen them!

Climate Data Dispute

From now on, I will make my negotiate to edit only normal temperatures(high/mean/low) and precipitation(rain/snow) data limitation in American cities. This is the case when your official link has made put additionally. Hope we don't argue with this problem later again. Period. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.191.173.190 (talk • contribs) (75.191.173.190 (talk) 03:18, 14 March 2014 (UTC))

The climate data in the Oslo article links to a reliable source, eKlima, official data from the national Met Office, ufortunatley data is behind some login wall. Take some effort to check details. Regards --Erik den yngre (talk) 20:01, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Changsha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Capital (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Edit warring on Taipei Comment

Hi, I've restored your version of the article but please be careful - edit comments like "pathetically has nothing better to do" is a personal attack and should be avoided. Maybe reporting the issue at WP:AIV would be a better option instead of engaging in an edit war. Best, ► Philg88 ◄ ^talk 07:31, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your eyes—it was not intended as a personal attack, and instead a summary of their "contribution" pattern, which is likely intent to indefinitely edit war regardless of the lectures by others, moreover established editors. I question the notion that this silent IP warrior views the "|rain colour = green" parameter as vandalism, since (s)he has made no comment in that regard, and even some established editors are hell-bent against colouring the precipitation or rain in {{Weather box}}, when there was no consensus to remove that option from the template altogether. "My master, Annatar the Great, bids thee ^welcome!" 07:42, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

You're welcome, and I understand where you're coming from but that's not how it would look to everyone. As for "rain colour = green" issue, it is a real pain. This is (at least) the third time I've seen edit warring over the issue - at Keelung I put a note in the source indicating that the parameter is valid but there are far too many instances of the template to do that for every one. I saw the discussion about removing the parameter altogether and it's a pity that there was no consensus. Maybe it would be worth restarting the discussion as there is now further evidence of the problems it causes. Cheers, ► Philg88 ◄ ^talk 08:01, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Update: It's started again so I've requested page protection on Taipei. ► Philg88 ◄ ^talk 08:44, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Blocked

I've blocked you 24 hours for edit warring with 75.191.173.190 (talk) across multiple articles. The IP is blocked for 72 hours. Edit warring is unacceptable, even if you think you are right, and I see that you have broken 3RR on multiple pages. I don't think that your edits fall under any of the exceptions at WP:3RRNO. Also, edit summaries like "Unexplained revert of a clearly superior established user" are not accurate, as Wikipedia policy is to try and treat editors equally when that is possible. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 21:55, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

@Mr. Stradivarius:, you likely are aware of my attempts (all rebuffed) to initiate discussion with that IP, and do you seriously believe that 72 hours is going to change this IP's behaviour? There are plenty of multiple-day breaks in editing from this IP, so they may well come back to this immediately after the 72 hours are up. Nothing short of a few weeks for them will do the job.

And why did you not act against me earlier this month? The circumstances were nearly identical, so if it was not edit-warring then, it isn't now.

"as Wikipedia policy is to try and treat editors equally when that is possible": So long as they continue this heavy-handed attitude (collateral damage), behave contrary to WP:NOTTHEM, refuse all attempts at discussion, and not improve their competence, IPs are never equals in discussion. "My master, Annatar the Great, bids thee ^welcome!" 21:58, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

@Mr. Stradivarius:: as an involved party, it's my duty to inform you of this discussion I had with Lieutenant of Melkor back when they were known as Guardian of the Rings. I encourage that you read through the whole diff, but I'd like to highlight the 1RR section in particular; in my opinion, the recent behaviour is in direct violation of those terms. m.o.p 22:43, 22 March 2014 (UTC)