User contributions for TropicAxe
A user with 95 edits. Account created on 16 August 2023.
17 November 2023
- 15:1115:11, 17 November 2023 diff hist −32 The Marvels No edit summary
- 15:0915:09, 17 November 2023 diff hist +1,608 User talk:TropicAxe →ANI notice: Reply Tag: Reply
- 14:5514:55, 17 November 2023 diff hist +756 Mission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning Part One @Nyxaros:Again, the WP:ONUS is on those who want to restore a challenged claim, in this case using a loaded WP:WEASEL word like MOS:ACCLAIMED i.e.where “multiple, high-quality” sources are required. The few citations presented so far are vague at best,based on a couple of early reactions loosely using that word. Please be WP:CIVIL and discuss on talk if you find better sources, and refrain from casting WP:ASPERSIONS. Instead focus on the edits and not the editor. Thanks, brah Tags: Undo Reverted
14 November 2023
- 22:0222:02, 14 November 2023 diff hist +53 The Marvels No edit summary
- 21:5721:57, 14 November 2023 diff hist +22 m Mission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning Part One typo, more accurate wording Tag: Reverted
- 21:5521:55, 14 November 2023 diff hist +546 Mission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning Part One WP:SYNTHy Tag: Reverted
13 November 2023
- 22:1822:18, 13 November 2023 diff hist +188 Mission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning Part One Ok, brah, as you already know…casting WP:ASPERSIONS isn’t a justification for a revert. Focus on the merits, and discuss on talk: i.e. The scant sources listed here are simply early reactions, and they are being given too much WP:UNDUE. WP:WEIGHT, and we should be careful when using the word MOS:ACCLAIM Tag: Reverted
- 22:0122:01, 13 November 2023 diff hist +224 Talk:Expend4bles No edit summary
6 November 2023
- 14:4214:42, 6 November 2023 diff hist +11 Expend4bles →Plot
- 14:4014:40, 6 November 2023 diff hist −29 Mission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning Part One undue weight given to few early reaction, it’s missing multiple high quality sources prescribed by MOS:ACCLAIMED. List on talkpage if there are updated sources
- 14:3214:32, 6 November 2023 diff hist +177 Talk:Expend4bles →The lead sentence
15 October 2023
- 01:4201:42, 15 October 2023 diff hist −22 Expend4bles No edit summary
13 October 2023
- 14:1914:19, 13 October 2023 diff hist +12 Expend4bles →Plot: unless he’s a clone or zombie, this is accurate, brahs
- 14:1714:17, 13 October 2023 diff hist −176 Mission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning Part One “REVERT” disruptive “BOLD” edit blatantly disregarding MOS:ACCLAIMED, so please “DISCUSS” now (on talk -page) why that previous bold-edit should take precedence, see WP:BRD Tags: Manual revert Reverted
- 14:0314:03, 13 October 2023 diff hist −10 m Subsidy No edit summary
12 October 2023
- 19:0719:07, 12 October 2023 diff hist +158 Mission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning Part One Online articles like the ones cited are outdated and toss the term "acclaim" around very loosely without really exploring that in depth, avoid loaded language like "critical acclaim", except in rare situations for films that have been historically documented as such in strong, high quality, reputable sources. Seek consensus on talk first before changing again please Tag: Reverted
- 19:0019:00, 12 October 2023 diff hist +230 Talk:Expend4bles →Requested move 25 September 2023: Reply Tag: Reply
2 October 2023
- 21:3021:30, 2 October 2023 diff hist +7 Expend4bles →Plot
- 21:2821:28, 2 October 2023 diff hist +143 Talk:Expend4bles →Requested move 25 September 2023
30 September 2023
- 16:2516:25, 30 September 2023 diff hist +22 The Expendables 3 →Plot
- 16:2316:23, 30 September 2023 diff hist +1 m Talk:Oppenheimer (film) fix, format
- 16:2216:22, 30 September 2023 diff hist −5 m Talk:Oppenheimer (film) No edit summary
- 16:1916:19, 30 September 2023 diff hist +184 Talk:Oppenheimer (film) fixed some grammar, typos, and a link
- 16:1416:14, 30 September 2023 diff hist +2 Expend4bles →Plot
- 16:1216:12, 30 September 2023 diff hist +991 Talk:Oppenheimer (film) →Critical reception in lead section: Reply Tag: Reply
- 15:4615:46, 30 September 2023 diff hist −1,292 User talk:Nyxaros Undid revision 1177936217 by TropicAxe (talk) self-revert. Never mind, saw you reverted it. My bad, brah Tag: Undo
- 15:4515:45, 30 September 2023 diff hist +1,292 User talk:Nyxaros Unsure if I didn’t properly submit this, or if you archived it, or reverted it. But I returned to fix some typos and grammar. Tag: Reverted
- 15:3615:36, 30 September 2023 diff hist −19 Expend4bles No edit summary
- 15:3415:34, 30 September 2023 diff hist −18 m User talk:Nyxaros fix, format Tag: Reverted
- 15:3315:33, 30 September 2023 diff hist +1,348 User talk:Nyxaros →Exchange reviews?: Reply Tags: Reverted Reply
- 15:1015:10, 30 September 2023 diff hist +723 Talk:Oppenheimer (film) →Critical reception in lead section: Reply Tag: Reply
- 15:0115:01, 30 September 2023 diff hist +24 Oppenheimer (film) restored to last stable version by Edwardo, leaving out dispute content ie. “director” accolades”, best film of year/century, “visuals” — until consensus & compromise is reached in ongoing discussion on talk. As the previous editor has asked, “Please leave it as it is”
- 14:5614:56, 30 September 2023 diff hist +21 Expend4bles No edit summary
- 00:5700:57, 30 September 2023 diff hist −2 Emily Blunt No edit summary
- 00:5600:56, 30 September 2023 diff hist +1,913 Talk:Oppenheimer (film) →Critical reception in lead section: Reply Tag: Reply
- 00:3400:34, 30 September 2023 diff hist −74 Oppenheimer (film) wp:brd revert, until content in dispute can be resolved on talk with a consensus
28 September 2023
- 17:5017:50, 28 September 2023 diff hist −6 m Oppenheimer (film) Succinct, flows better
- 17:4917:49, 28 September 2023 diff hist −15 m Oppenheimer (film) Incorporating feedback from others to keep lead concise
- 17:3717:37, 28 September 2023 diff hist −5 m Oppenheimer (film) fixed ref glitch
- 17:3617:36, 28 September 2023 diff hist +133 Oppenheimer (film) No edit summary
- 17:2017:20, 28 September 2023 diff hist +258 Talk:Oppenheimer (film) →Critical reception in lead section: Reply Tag: Reply
27 September 2023
- 21:1221:12, 27 September 2023 diff hist +2,381 Talk:Oppenheimer (film) →Critical reception in lead section: Reply Tag: Reply
- 16:4216:42, 27 September 2023 diff hist +1,273 Talk:Oppenheimer (film) →Critical reception in lead section: Reply Tag: Reply
- 16:3116:31, 27 September 2023 diff hist +8 Carrot No edit summary
- 16:2916:29, 27 September 2023 diff hist −46 Oppenheimer (film) Succinct, currently awaiting outcome on this page’s discussion page before including phrasing in dispute
26 September 2023
- 21:2721:27, 26 September 2023 diff hist +26 Carrot No edit summary
- 21:2421:24, 26 September 2023 diff hist +2,419 Talk:Oppenheimer (film) →Critical reception in lead section: Reply Tag: Reply
- 20:5320:53, 26 September 2023 diff hist +4 m Oppenheimer (film) No edit summary
- 20:5220:52, 26 September 2023 diff hist +20 Oppenheimer (film) You could’ve consulted me on the forum before deciding for me what you think is best. The rest should remain on hold until the discussion is over; that I started on the forum.
- 18:3918:39, 26 September 2023 diff hist +959 Talk:Oppenheimer (film) →Critical reception in lead section: Reply Tag: Reply
