User contributions for Simba1409
A user with 350 edits. Account created on 10 November 2009.
4 November 2023
- 11:2911:29, 4 November 2023 diff hist −2,099 Monique Ryan Undid revision 1183265378 by GMH Melbourne (talk) Criticisms from a school principal don't belong on Wikipedia. Tag: Undo
10 May 2023
- 12:3212:32, 10 May 2023 diff hist +686 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rugg v Ryan (2nd nomination) →Rugg v Ryan
9 May 2023
- 13:1713:17, 9 May 2023 diff hist +208 Talk:Rugg v Ryan →Settlement: new section Tag: New topic
29 April 2023
- 12:0012:00, 29 April 2023 diff hist +1,090 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rugg v Ryan →Rugg v Ryan
28 April 2023
- 09:0209:02, 28 April 2023 diff hist +355 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rugg v Ryan →Rugg v Ryan
27 April 2023
- 12:4612:46, 27 April 2023 diff hist +891 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rugg v Ryan →Rugg v Ryan
- 12:2512:25, 27 April 2023 diff hist +148 User talk:Simba1409 →Managing a conflict of interest
26 April 2023
- 23:1523:15, 26 April 2023 diff hist +444 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rugg v Ryan →Rugg v Ryan
- 14:1114:11, 26 April 2023 diff hist −7 m Josh Hope (soccer) →Club career: improving the sentence
- 12:1712:17, 26 April 2023 diff hist +1,459 User talk:PeterGrecian Notification: proposed deletion of Paul Sinton-Hewitt. Tag: Twinkle
- 12:1712:17, 26 April 2023 diff hist +46 Talk:Paul Sinton-Hewitt Adding {{Old prod}} Tag: Twinkle
- 12:1712:17, 26 April 2023 diff hist +252 Paul Sinton-Hewitt Proposing article for deletion per WP:PROD. Tags: Twinkle Reverted
- 11:3711:37, 26 April 2023 diff hist +427 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rugg v Ryan →Rugg v Ryan
25 April 2023
- 09:0709:07, 25 April 2023 diff hist +316 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rugg v Ryan No edit summary
24 April 2023
- 09:2109:21, 24 April 2023 diff hist +626 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rugg v Ryan →Rugg v Ryan
- 04:3204:32, 24 April 2023 diff hist +1 m Simon Holmes à Court →Kooyong 200 and feud with Josh Frydenberg
- 04:1104:11, 24 April 2023 diff hist +551 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rugg v Ryan →Rugg v Ryan
- 03:5903:59, 24 April 2023 diff hist −1 User talk:Simba1409 →Managing a conflict of interest
- 03:5303:53, 24 April 2023 diff hist +2,353 User talk:Simba1409 →Managing a conflict of interest
- 02:1602:16, 24 April 2023 diff hist +1,164 User talk:GMH Melbourne Notification: listing of Rugg v Ryan at WP:Articles for deletion. Tag: Twinkle
- 02:1602:16, 24 April 2023 diff hist +48 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 April 24 Adding Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rugg v Ryan. Tag: Twinkle
- 02:1602:16, 24 April 2023 diff hist +1,784 N Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rugg v Ryan Creating deletion discussion page for Rugg v Ryan. Tag: Twinkle
- 02:1602:16, 24 April 2023 diff hist +418 Rugg v Ryan Nominated for deletion; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rugg v Ryan. Tag: Twinkle
23 April 2023
- 07:1107:11, 23 April 2023 diff hist +420 Rugg v Ryan No edit summary Tag: Reverted
22 April 2023
- 14:3114:31, 22 April 2023 diff hist −722 Monique Ryan Undid revision 1151140310 by GMH Melbourne (talk) Wikipedia is not to be used to exercise your personal political bias. Political bias is the only reason you would come back to edit this after the dispute was taken to the talk page, a third opinion was requested and an extremely detailed reason was given for keeping this out. Do not put this content back again or further action will be taken. Tag: Undo
20 April 2023
- 09:4809:48, 20 April 2023 diff hist −1,507 Climate 200 →Reception: The deleted sentences are purely political commentary and the reference for Sarina is a broken link. Tag: Reverted
- 09:3609:36, 20 April 2023 diff hist +25 Climate 200 Climate 200 does not run candidates. Tag: Reverted
- 09:1309:13, 20 April 2023 diff hist +4 Calem Nieuwenhof No edit summary
13 April 2023
- 13:2013:20, 13 April 2023 diff hist +126 Talk:Monique Ryan →Sally Rugg Affidavit: Reply Tag: Reply
10 April 2023
- 11:3611:36, 10 April 2023 diff hist +2,108 Talk:Monique Ryan →Sally Rugg Affidavit
- 10:5010:50, 10 April 2023 diff hist +328 User talk:Simba1409 →April 2023
- 10:4210:42, 10 April 2023 diff hist +218 User talk:Simba1409 →April 2023
- 10:3410:34, 10 April 2023 diff hist +588 User talk:Simba1409 →April 2023
- 10:2610:26, 10 April 2023 diff hist +209 User talk:Simba1409 →April 2023
9 April 2023
- 12:2912:29, 9 April 2023 diff hist −701 Monique Ryan Undid revision 1148944484 by GMH Melbourne (talk) No it's not. At the very top of that article it says "Avoid stating seriously contested assertions as facts." The claims by Rugg are indeed contested and your edit doesn't even state this. Do not change this again, refer to the talk page if you disagree. Tag: Undo
8 April 2023
- 12:1712:17, 8 April 2023 diff hist +230 Talk:Monique Ryan →Papers
- 12:1312:13, 8 April 2023 diff hist 0 Talk:Monique Ryan →Papers
- 12:1312:13, 8 April 2023 diff hist +4 Talk:Monique Ryan →Papers
- 12:1212:12, 8 April 2023 diff hist +335 Talk:Monique Ryan →Papers
- 12:0012:00, 8 April 2023 diff hist −701 Monique Ryan Untested claims on an affidavit don't belong here. Until this case goes to trial, it is a she said, she said situation. Only factual outcomes from the court should be be published here and not (what appears to be political motivated) selections of the affidavits filed in this case.
30 July 2022
- 11:3211:32, 30 July 2022 diff hist −116 Kylea Tink This is not relevant, on no major party politician's Wikipedia page is it stated the % of donations received from certain groups.
- 11:3111:31, 30 July 2022 diff hist −52 Monique Ryan In no other politicians Wikipedia is it stated where they receive funding from. The major parties receive funding from large corporations but this is not written on their wikipedia profiles, so nor should this regarding C200.
23 October 2021
- 12:1612:16, 23 October 2021 diff hist −186 Voices movement (Australia) Undid revision 1051413512 by Playlet (talk) Their constitution calls them a party. Their websites calls themselves a party as do their quotes in news articles. They are clearly a party. Their website also references Liberal and Labor voting in new laws for party membership, requiring more members to maintain party status even if they aren't yet registered party, that is clear their intention. If you disagree, take it too talk, Tag: Undo
- 07:4307:43, 23 October 2021 diff hist +3 Morrison government →Prima facie case on Christian Porter
- 07:4007:40, 23 October 2021 diff hist +1,232 Morrison government →Second term of government 2019–
- 07:0807:08, 23 October 2021 diff hist −339 Voices movement (Australia) →List: Tony was voted out so clearly Vote Tony Out no longer exists.
- 07:0707:07, 23 October 2021 diff hist −186 Voices movement (Australia) →List: The local party is an actual political party, not a grassroots engagement group. Big difference. Tag: Reverted
22 October 2021
- 12:2712:27, 22 October 2021 diff hist −517 Daniel Andrews As has every state leader. This is pointless info that doesn't add to the article and won't be relevant after COVID has left our minds.
- 12:2412:24, 22 October 2021 diff hist −1,769 Daniel Andrews →COVID-19 pandemic: doesn't belong on Dan's bio page, should be in the main pandemic article.
18 October 2021
- 10:3010:30, 18 October 2021 diff hist −771 Daniel Andrews Undid revision 1050509851 by LivingInTwilight (talk) You have no citations to support that Andrews is being investigated. Tag: Undo
