User contributions for Roy Brumback

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

03:5203:52, 16 August 2018 diff hist +489‎ Aleph number ‎ →‎Continuum hypothesis
03:3803:38, 16 August 2018 diff hist −183‎ Aleph number ‎ →‎Aleph-one: This is addressed in the paragraph below so I removed this and will add a citation in the section below.

05:5105:51, 11 December 2016 diff hist +9‎ Saint Joseph ‎ →‎In the New Testament
05:4505:45, 11 December 2016 diff hist −61‎ Saint Joseph ‎ I fixed two false statements about no mention of Jesus' father being in the Gospel of Mark, and I removed a redundancy about the two genealogies that was already mentioned above.

22:3922:39, 22 July 2015 diff hist +2‎ Book of Leviticus ‎ →‎Composition
22:3822:38, 22 July 2015 diff hist −2‎ Dead Sea Scrolls ‎No edit summary
22:3622:36, 22 July 2015 diff hist +3‎ Dead Sea Scrolls ‎No edit summary
22:3522:35, 22 July 2015 diff hist −2‎ Dead Sea Scrolls ‎No edit summary
22:3422:34, 22 July 2015 diff hist +58‎ Dead Sea Scrolls ‎ Fixed date sorry :(
22:2922:29, 22 July 2015 diff hist +27‎ Book of Leviticus ‎ →‎Composition: Fixed date
22:2322:23, 22 July 2015 diff hist +1‎ Dead Sea Scrolls ‎No edit summary
22:2322:23, 22 July 2015 diff hist +243‎ Dead Sea Scrolls ‎ I added the recent discovery of a piece of Leviticus that is older than the Dead Sea Scrolls.
22:1022:10, 22 July 2015 diff hist +686‎ Book of Leviticus ‎ →‎Composition: Pointed out scholars opinion on dating and composition are hypotheses and added discovery of ancient piece of Leviticus.

14:4314:43, 18 November 2014 diff hist −9‎ User:Roy Brumback ‎No edit summary current
04:3304:33, 18 November 2014 diff hist +4‎ Gospel of Mark ‎ →‎Place in the Christian Church: Again a hypothesis not a theory.
04:2904:29, 18 November 2014 diff hist −1‎ Gospel of Mark ‎ →‎Setting
04:2804:28, 18 November 2014 diff hist −139‎ Gospel of Mark ‎ →‎Setting: This is redundant is the dating of the Gospel has already been discussed.
04:2604:26, 18 November 2014 diff hist −2‎ Gospel of Mark ‎ →‎The synoptic problem and the historicity of Mark: The q source is a hypothesis not a theory.
04:2104:21, 18 November 2014 diff hist +45‎ Gospel of Mark ‎ →‎Composition: Again hypotheses should not be stated as though they were facts.
04:1804:18, 18 November 2014 diff hist −1,253‎ Gospel of Mark ‎ It is not a fact that the author wasn't or did not know any eyewitnesses to Jesus' ministry, it is a hypothesis and it is already said in the intro and directly below this section that most scholars today believe the hypothesis so it is redundant as well.

19:0719:07, 6 August 2014 diff hist −120‎ Ancient Rome ‎ →‎Empire: These are all opinions, not facts as stated. Glory is partly a matter of opinion, we do not know whether the majority of people in the empire were happier than the Romans before the empire or the people in the nations they conquered.

18:1118:11, 13 January 2014 diff hist +478‎ Talk:Fall of the Western Roman Empire ‎ →‎Gibbon, and the rich of the Late Empire
06:0606:06, 13 January 2014 diff hist −439‎ Fall of the Western Roman Empire ‎ This section has many problems. What was of paramount importance to the government is a matter of opinion, plenty of rich landowners were killed by various emperors, and it was not the "republic" but the triumviers that killed and stole from the rich.
05:4105:41, 13 January 2014 diff hist −405‎ Fall of the Western Roman Empire ‎ Since we don't know any actual money figures we don't need Gibbon's speculations and snotty tone and the counter speculations after them.
05:2305:23, 13 January 2014 diff hist +409‎ Ancient Rome ‎ →‎Fall of the Western Roman Empire: Added in some more possible reasons for fall.
04:5704:57, 13 January 2014 diff hist −4‎ Ancient Rome ‎ →‎Constantine and the Christianity

18:0518:05, 14 April 2012 diff hist −13‎ Time in physics ‎ Undid revision 484555472 by 98.196.29.42 (talk) No, stronger gravity gives you a larger acceleration.

21:0321:03, 12 April 2012 diff hist +782‎ Religion and children ‎ →‎Health effects: Benefit is too vague. This study examined statistical correlations so we should point that out. The other info applies to children. It doesn't have to only apply to children to be relevant.
18:1518:15, 12 April 2012 diff hist +7,944‎ Religion and children ‎ They are all cited, that is an actual scientific study that also quotes several other scientific studies. I took an entire class on religion and psychology and learned the same results there. Hit job indeed.