User contributions for Panthkhalsa
A user with 74 edits. Account created on 1 March 2009.
14 March 2009
- 03:0603:06, 14 March 2009 diff hist +1,591 User talk:Panthkhalsa No edit summary
- 02:4802:48, 14 March 2009 diff hist +687 User talk:Panthkhalsa →March 2009
12 March 2009
- 17:3617:36, 12 March 2009 diff hist +3,680 User talk:Panthkhalsa →March 2009: Thanks
- 16:2416:24, 12 March 2009 diff hist −6 Mazhabi Sikh Added link to maha vir chakra
- 16:1616:16, 12 March 2009 diff hist −337 Bhai Mati Das Undid revision 276760650 by Utcursch (talk) Go and talk with the SGPC please before making your false claim. Kind regards.
- 16:1316:13, 12 March 2009 diff hist +1,066 Talk:Mazhabi Sikh →Please resign Utcurch: You have no idea what you are getting your self in for.
11 March 2009
- 22:3522:35, 11 March 2009 diff hist +181 Talk:Bhai Mati Das Utcurch, resign.
- 22:3022:30, 11 March 2009 diff hist −445 Bhai Mati Das Undid revision 276053356 by Utcursch (talk) please read Var 11 page 125 Bhai Gurdas ji
- 22:2722:27, 11 March 2009 diff hist +3,813 Talk:Mazhabi Sikh No edit summary
8 March 2009
- 20:5820:58, 8 March 2009 diff hist +1,620 Hari Singh Nalwa Due to a neutral policy i have gone with the better sources. I have better still introduced the controvery from both the khatri and Mazhabi points of view. This is now neutral, cant just state khatri
- 20:2320:23, 8 March 2009 diff hist +2,649 Hari Singh Nalwa Undid revision 275839864 by Pahari Sahib (talk) Uppal khatri has only been stated by one writer its not good enough.
- 20:2120:21, 8 March 2009 diff hist +55 Mazhabi Sikh Undid revision 275844109 by 122.162.148.204 (talk)Your in denial
- 16:3916:39, 8 March 2009 diff hist +2,649 Hari Singh Nalwa Undid revision 275308984 by Utcursch (talk) What you are stating is not right and historicaly inaccurate.
- 16:3016:30, 8 March 2009 diff hist +3,237 Talk:Mazhabi Sikh →Blatant propaganda: I disagree with your politicaly correct socialist indian views. It may be a taboo subject there but not here on the web.
- 15:2715:27, 8 March 2009 diff hist +150 Mazhabi Sikh No edit summary
- 15:0715:07, 8 March 2009 diff hist +13 Mazhabi Sikh No edit summary
- 14:3314:33, 8 March 2009 diff hist +4 Mazhabi Sikh No edit summary
- 14:3214:32, 8 March 2009 diff hist +4 Mazhabi Sikh No edit summary
- 14:3114:31, 8 March 2009 diff hist −1 Mazhabi Sikh No edit summary
- 14:2314:23, 8 March 2009 diff hist +101 Mazhabi Sikh No edit summary
- 14:2114:21, 8 March 2009 diff hist +2,376 Mazhabi Sikh Undid revision 275776629 by 122.162.176.210 (talk) Disprove the claim please
- 03:4803:48, 8 March 2009 diff hist −46 Mazhabi Sikh No edit summary
- 03:4603:46, 8 March 2009 diff hist −25 Mazhabi Sikh No edit summary
- 03:4203:42, 8 March 2009 diff hist +16 Mazhabi Sikh No edit summary
- 03:3003:30, 8 March 2009 diff hist +12 Mazhabi Sikh No edit summary
- 03:0303:03, 8 March 2009 diff hist +1,021 Mazhabi Sikh No edit summary
- 02:4102:41, 8 March 2009 diff hist +2 Mazhabi Sikh No edit summary
- 02:3802:38, 8 March 2009 diff hist +1 Mazhabi Sikh No edit summary
- 02:3702:37, 8 March 2009 diff hist −1 Mazhabi Sikh No edit summary
- 02:3602:36, 8 March 2009 diff hist +26 Mazhabi Sikh →References: The sikh review 1995
7 March 2009
- 20:3220:32, 7 March 2009 diff hist +17 Mazhabi Sikh No edit summary
- 20:1920:19, 7 March 2009 diff hist +22 Mazhabi Sikh No edit summary
- 20:1420:14, 7 March 2009 diff hist +288 Mazhabi Sikh I have added two rather large reference points, 'The sepoy' and the 'martial races' writen by British writers...enjoy the reading. I shall be joined by more editors soon. Kind regards.
- 20:0220:02, 7 March 2009 diff hist +12 Mazhabi Sikh This is not a finished product yet, more references and sources to go, more information will be placed, i hope you enjoy reading. Kind regards.
- 19:5519:55, 7 March 2009 diff hist +4 Mazhabi Sikh No edit summary
- 19:5319:53, 7 March 2009 diff hist +6 Mazhabi Sikh Just thought i would highlight the reference, you seem to be a bit blind. Do you even read what ive written? I think you are abusing your position as admin.. just a thought. Kind regards.
- 19:4719:47, 7 March 2009 diff hist −15 Mazhabi Sikh No edit summary
- 19:4619:46, 7 March 2009 diff hist +64 Mazhabi Sikh I'm very busy but will always challenge you. You cannot over look the history of a people with only a cencus as a source, you are an admin. you should know better.
- 19:3419:34, 7 March 2009 diff hist +2 Mazhabi Sikh No edit summary
- 19:3019:30, 7 March 2009 diff hist +53 Mazhabi Sikh Hi there again kind sir, i have added the Dasam Granth website, which you may view at your pleasure. I am also sure you are intelligent enough to read p126 var11 about mati das. Kind regards.
- 19:2319:23, 7 March 2009 diff hist +5,755 Mazhabi Sikh Judging by your name you are not even a sikh, so please don't argue about something you know nothing about. I have added references and stated the names of authors and writers. check ref. Kind Regards
6 March 2009
- 15:1115:11, 6 March 2009 diff hist +5,228 Mazhabi Sikh Your article is all wrong please dont tamper with this article withought justification for every fact. Valmik came about in1947 hence came after mazhabis. Just for starters.
- 15:0915:09, 6 March 2009 diff hist −23 Mazhabi Sikh Undid revision 275316150 by Utcursch (talk) Your factual information is wrong i dont know where to start.
- 15:0715:07, 6 March 2009 diff hist −33 Mazhabi Sikh Undid revision 275391541 by SmackBot (talk)
5 March 2009
- 15:5315:53, 5 March 2009 diff hist +14 Khatri No edit summary
- 15:4915:49, 5 March 2009 diff hist +793 Khatri Just added a little extra info which i felt was missing.
- 15:3415:34, 5 March 2009 diff hist +12 Mazhabi Sikh No edit summary
- 15:3215:32, 5 March 2009 diff hist 0 Hari Singh Nalwa No edit summary
- 15:3115:31, 5 March 2009 diff hist +14 Hari Singh Nalwa No edit summary
- 15:2515:25, 5 March 2009 diff hist +118 Udham Singh Undid revision 275087586 by Utcursch (talk) he may not have been called Udham Singh Mazbhi, but he certainly was not a kamboj.
