User contributions for Paddykumar

A user with 177 edits. Account created on 22 May 2019.

This account is currently blocked. (Show block details) The latest block log entry is provided below for reference:

View full log
Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

25 March 2023

19 January 2023

1 January 2023

31 December 2022

29 December 2022

28 December 2022

27 December 2022

  • 12:3612:36, 27 December 2022 diff hist −265 Kellie-Jay Keen-MinshullUndid revision 1129755795 by Source 1: Asking for evidence is not an endorsement. Source 2:Tweet. Supposed context is given in reply, so we don't know what the original tweet was in respect of. Source 3: Not my OR www.feministcurrent.com is attached to tweet. Criticism of media is "Why is this insignificant man given such significance?" But also she says, "mouthy yob","probably racist" and "opportunist". There really isn't anything giving "support" or "praise" to TR. Tag: Undo

26 December 2022

  • 21:3021:30, 26 December 2022 diff hist −265 Kellie-Jay Keen-MinshullUndid revision. I can see a reply tweet from "Katie" saying "TERF Posie Parker enraged that her mate, far-right EDL Fuhrer Tommy Robinson, has been arrested by polices for incitement to racial hatred." But the PP original tweet does not mention TR. In the podcast I did not hear "he's not that bad". I did hear her say "mouthy yob","probably racist" and "opportunist". I cannot see evidence for "expressed support for" and "repeatedly praised."the text Tags: Undo Reverted
  • 19:1819:18, 26 December 2022 diff hist +198 Kellie-Jay Keen-MinshullPuberty blockers and cross sex hormones
  • 17:0017:00, 26 December 2022 diff hist −265 Kellie-Jay Keen-MinshullI cannot see proof of support for Tommy Robinson. In www.feministcurrent.com/2019/01/24/podcast-posie-parker-standing-for-women/ which seems to be a source, Keen says of Robinson that he is "probably racist" and and "opportunist". Tag: Reverted

16 December 2022

8 December 2022

2 December 2022

1 December 2022

  • 16:5416:54, 1 December 2022 diff hist +435 Mermaids (charity)Undid revision 1124952298 WP:ONUS means the item should be included. The charity is under scrutiny for a number of reasons, including this one. The "right-leaning British press" is not relevant. Safeguarding should be considered when recruiting to a children's charity. That is why this item is important. It raises questions about whether the charity is well run. WP:NPOV would arise with NOT including this item. Tags: Undo Reverted

25 November 2022

24 October 2022

13 October 2022

12 October 2022

8 October 2022

7 October 2022

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)