User contributions for Forest51690
A user with 48 edits. Account created on 27 March 2006.
12 July 2022
- 13:2313:23, 12 July 2022 diff hist −153 Song structure →Conclusion or outro: Reword a section that really needed it Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
8 March 2022
6 March 2022
- 23:2423:24, 6 March 2022 diff hist +2,406 Talk:Genesis flood narrative Respond to Doug Weller and re:tgeorgescu. Fix the heading to no longer express a criticism, as per Talk Page Guidelines.
- 01:1901:19, 6 March 2022 diff hist +3,705 Talk:Genesis flood narrative →The Cline 2007 source is bad: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
5 March 2022
- 23:3823:38, 5 March 2022 diff hist +286 Talk:Genesis flood narrative No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
24 June 2020
- 23:0623:06, 24 June 2020 diff hist −120 Smörgåsbord →Etymology: Remove citation needed from 2009. Reeks of hearsay. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
23 April 2020
- 20:5920:59, 23 April 2020 diff hist +278 Talk:SharePoint →webstack -> webpack?: new section
7 June 2019
- 14:2514:25, 7 June 2019 diff hist 0 Hasidic Judaism →Immanence: Fixed wording "was and" -> "and was" Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
5 June 2019
- 00:1800:18, 5 June 2019 diff hist −2 Foreclosure →Contesting a foreclosure: Fixed "did not offered" incorrect conjugation Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
7 September 2017
- 13:1413:14, 7 September 2017 diff hist 0 m Talk:Genesis flood narrative Misspelled Hijiri 88
- 13:1213:12, 7 September 2017 diff hist +7 m Talk:Genesis flood narrative Indentation
- 13:1013:10, 7 September 2017 diff hist +309 Talk:Genesis flood narrative No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 02:1502:15, 7 September 2017 diff hist +196 User talk:Forest51690 IP Unblock request
5 September 2017
- 22:4122:41, 5 September 2017 diff hist 0 m Talk:Genesis flood narrative Formatting
- 22:4022:40, 5 September 2017 diff hist +2,168 Talk:Genesis flood narrative Clarify intent, begging the question
- 17:5517:55, 5 September 2017 diff hist +2 m Talk:Genesis flood narrative Formatting
- 17:5417:54, 5 September 2017 diff hist +2 m Talk:Genesis flood narrative Formatting
- 17:5317:53, 5 September 2017 diff hist +1,939 Talk:Genesis flood narrative Clarify equivocation, posit analogy, seek clarification on what we consider a "textual contradiction".
4 September 2017
- 17:3917:39, 4 September 2017 diff hist +1,957 Talk:Genesis flood narrative →"universal" flood myth: Minor suggestion and side note with request for help. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
3 September 2017
- 22:1722:17, 3 September 2017 diff hist +2 User talk:Forest51690 →September 2017: Formatting Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 22:1622:16, 3 September 2017 diff hist +242 User talk:Forest51690 →September 2017 Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 20:0420:04, 3 September 2017 diff hist +723 Talk:Genesis flood narrative →Disjointed narrative Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 19:0119:01, 3 September 2017 diff hist +407 Talk:Genesis flood narrative →Disjointed narrative Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
2 September 2017
- 22:5522:55, 2 September 2017 diff hist +2,402 Talk:Genesis flood narrative →Disjointed narrative Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 19:1219:12, 2 September 2017 diff hist +681 Talk:Genesis flood narrative →Disjointed narrative Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 16:2016:20, 2 September 2017 diff hist +1,009 Talk:Genesis flood narrative →Disjointed narrative Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 13:4013:40, 2 September 2017 diff hist +2,083 Genesis flood narrative Granted; I see it is a book. Anyway, I don't see why you are reverting my change. What is wrong with it? Or why are you preferring one professor's book over others written by other scholars?
- 13:0713:07, 2 September 2017 diff hist +1,939 Genesis flood narrative These widely-read commentaries certainly represent a significant interpretation of the text. Why would you accept a single Nat Geo article as a source and not these works? Do not suppress knowledge. What is wrong with my changes?
- 12:3112:31, 2 September 2017 diff hist +5 m Genesis flood narrative No edit summary
- 12:2912:29, 2 September 2017 diff hist +1,934 Genesis flood narrative Added more sources to the part on contradictions, moving the content to its own section. Previously there was only one source on the topic: a National Geographic article (Cline). Added more viewpoints, maintaining an overall neutral position.
1 September 2017
- 21:3121:31, 1 September 2017 diff hist −86 Genesis flood narrative Not a clear contradiction. The 150 days in verse 24 is more likely referring to the total duration of the flood, whereas 40 days in verse 17 is more likely how long the water rose. Evident from the context: "the waters increased and bore up the ark"
18 November 2013
- 21:1721:17, 18 November 2013 diff hist −10 m Noise-cancelling headphones Removed 'typically'. The use of the phrase "X typically uses Y" implies that there are some X that do not use Y, which has not been shown in this article.
13 November 2013
- 14:0814:08, 13 November 2013 diff hist −2 m Cross-origin resource sharing Changed word "powerful" to "useful". Power implies strength. Useful implies extent of abilities.
7 May 2013
- 13:5113:51, 7 May 2013 diff hist −14 Abomination (Bible) →Shiqquwts: In Jeremiah 13:27, it does not apply 'abomination' to sexual practices, though they are mentioned in the same list. It applies to the "high places", where the Israelites would set up their idol Asherah poles.
6 February 2013
- 18:0918:09, 6 February 2013 diff hist +418 Affirming the consequent →Examples: Added an insightful example having to do with cause and effect.
13 September 2012
- 19:4819:48, 13 September 2012 diff hist +1 m Western gull scientific name in parens and italic like all other aritcles
11 September 2012
- 20:5220:52, 11 September 2012 diff hist −4 m Summer tanager Format of name & scientific name to match the majority of WikiPedia articles
28 August 2012
- 20:5520:55, 28 August 2012 diff hist +1 m Afep pigeon spaces
11 March 2012
- 06:2006:20, 11 March 2012 diff hist +25 m Religion and sexuality →Deuteronomomistic code: grammar
- 06:1806:18, 11 March 2012 diff hist +22 Religion and sexuality →Deuteronomomistic code: Deut 22:28-29 It is worth noting that the woman is not forbidden from divorcing the man; only the man the woman
- 06:1406:14, 11 March 2012 diff hist +65 Religion and sexuality →Deuteronomomistic code: clarified the laws on sex with a betrothed virgin. Within the town if she did not scream it is assumed that the two were having consensual sex. In the countryside there is no way to know whether it was consensual.
- 06:0406:04, 11 March 2012 diff hist 0 m Religion and sexuality →Covenant code: The phrase "for sexual purposes" implies a temporary relationship, while a concubine is like a wife
- 05:5705:57, 11 March 2012 diff hist −10 Religion and sexuality →Deuteronomomistic code: rewrite for smoother reading
- 05:5205:52, 11 March 2012 diff hist +6 m Religion and sexuality →Deuteronomomistic code: Sex slave? More accurately a forced wife.
9 March 2012
- 23:2123:21, 9 March 2012 diff hist −1 m Jewish views on slavery →Biblical era: "Condoned" implies that the slavery was inherently wrong, which is a biased opinion.
22 May 2010
- 15:5615:56, 22 May 2010 diff hist +20 m Box girder No edit summary
8 May 2010
- 17:1117:11, 8 May 2010 diff hist −2 m Page Avenue →Miscellaneous
18 August 2006
- 15:0515:05, 18 August 2006 diff hist +71 South Lakes High School →School Design: added that there are no doors
