User contributions for Estnot

15 March 2022

• 20:4320:43, 15 March 2022 diff hist −4,600‎ The Battle at Lake Changjin II ‎ Revert edits by mx. granger. The material uses sources that do not appear to be reliable either in themselves or in context Tag: Reverted
• 19:5619:56, 15 March 2022 diff hist +3‎ The Battle at Lake Changjin II ‎ →‎Critical response: adjust content to better reflect the source profiles Tag: Reverted
• 19:3219:32, 15 March 2022 diff hist +1,457‎ Talk:The Battle at Lake Changjin II ‎ →‎Description as propaganda

14 March 2022

• 02:3802:38, 14 March 2022 diff hist +1,219‎ Talk:The Battle at Lake Changjin II ‎ →‎Description as propaganda

11 March 2022

• 23:2823:28, 11 March 2022 diff hist +1,066‎ Talk:The Battle at Lake Changjin II ‎ →‎Description as propaganda
• 04:2604:26, 11 March 2022 diff hist +981‎ User talk:Mx. Granger ‎ →‎Please stop your edit warrring

10 March 2022

• 20:5020:50, 10 March 2022 diff hist +797‎ Talk:The Battle at Lake Changjin II ‎ →‎Description as propaganda
• 20:1820:18, 10 March 2022 diff hist +1,440‎ User talk:Mx. Granger ‎ →‎Please stop your edit warrring: new section
• 20:1520:15, 10 March 2022 diff hist −252‎ The Battle at Lake Changjin II ‎ Undid revision 1076360328 by Mx. Granger (talk) the article before your revert was the stable version. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/index.php?title=The_Battle_at_Lake_Changjin_II&diff=1070028971&oldid=1070028856] Please do not revert and discuss on the talk page first as you are the one who has been reverted wp:brd Tags: Undo Reverted

9 March 2022

• 23:1923:19, 9 March 2022 diff hist −252‎ The Battle at Lake Changjin II ‎ →‎Critical response: Restore previous version of the material which was written by user 76.11.114.137 [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Battle_at_Lake_Changjin_II&diff=1069952872&oldid=1069905198] and then removed by user Mx. Granger. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/index.php?title=The_Battle_at_Lake_Changjin_II&diff=1070028971&oldid=1070028856] Mx. Granger please do not revert again and discuss on the talk page first as you are the one who has now been reverted wp:brd Tag: Reverted
• 22:1422:14, 9 March 2022 diff hist −11‎ South China Sea Arbitration ‎ Adjust content as the previous version appeared to tooo closely paraphrase what was written in the source (wp:paraphrase) Tag: Reverted
• 22:0522:05, 9 March 2022 diff hist −787‎ South China Sea Arbitration ‎ Removed some information which appears to be too specific and insufficiently discussed in the body of the article to be included into the lead section and also given undue weight. (wp:leadrel, wp:leadfollowsbody and wp:undue Tag: Reverted

4 March 2022

• 12:2712:27, 4 March 2022 diff hist −78‎ Kevin Rudd ‎ Removed some information which is outdated and also appears to be too specific for inclusion into the lead section

25 February 2022

• 12:1412:14, 25 February 2022 diff hist +289‎ Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sinwiki12 ‎ →‎Suspected sockpuppets

24 February 2022

• 09:1009:10, 24 February 2022 diff hist +1,193‎ Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sinwiki12 ‎ →‎Suspected sockpuppets

16 February 2022

• 08:1208:12, 16 February 2022 diff hist +138‎ Talk:Brahma Chellaney ‎ →‎Discussion
• 08:1008:10, 16 February 2022 diff hist +695‎ Talk:Brahma Chellaney ‎ →‎Survey
• 07:4807:48, 16 February 2022 diff hist +649‎ User talk:Porxchp772049 ‎ →‎SPI: new section Tag: Reverted
• 07:4807:48, 16 February 2022 diff hist +651‎ User talk:Sinwiki12 ‎ →‎SPI: new section
• 07:3907:39, 16 February 2022 diff hist +8,685‎ N Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sinwiki12 ‎ ←Created page with '{{subst:SPI report |checkuser=no <!--If you want to request checkuser, simply change the line above this comment to checkuser=yes For the list of suspected sockpuppets, you may use up to sock20 and ip20. If there are more than 20 socks or IPs, list them after creating the report by duplicating the {{checkuser}} and {{checkip}} templates. --> |sock1= Porxchp772049 |sock2= Destinyseeker89 |sock3= |ip1= |ip2= |ip3= |evidence= Both Sinwiki12 and Porxchp7720...'

8 February 2022

• 00:0000:00, 8 February 2022 diff hist −570‎ The Battle at Lake Changjin II ‎ →‎Plot: revert edit by Mx. Granger. This source does not appear to be usable because the film has the Chinese government as one of its stakeholders and is also about topics where the government of China has reason to use its reporting on them for propaganda or disinformation purposes. wp:rsp#xinhua. Please do not revert and discuss on the talk page first as you are the one who has been reverted wp:brd

7 February 2022

• 23:5823:58, 7 February 2022 diff hist +1,041‎ The Battle at Lake Changjin II ‎ →‎Reception: Adjust content as suggested by user Mx. Granger. It does not appear to be clear how the previous content violated reliability policy on news headlines but as a goodwill gesture have cited more information from the body of the used sources to try and correct the putative violations

6 February 2022

• 03:0103:01, 6 February 2022 diff hist −108‎ 2022 Winter Olympics ‎ →‎Opening ceremony: removed some information which appears to misrepresent what was in the sources
• 02:5702:57, 6 February 2022 diff hist −73‎ Concerns and controversies at the 2022 Winter Olympics ‎ →‎Diplomatic boycotts: this sentence could not be found in the source
• 02:5002:50, 6 February 2022 diff hist +987‎ Concerns and controversies at the 2022 Winter Olympics ‎ →‎Diplomatic boycotts: Moved paragraph from the 2022 Winter Olympics main page
• 02:4902:49, 6 February 2022 diff hist −996‎ 2022 Winter Olympics ‎ →‎Concerns and controversies: Moved paragraph that appears to be more appropriate for the “United States diplomatic boycott”section in the “Concerns and controversies at the 2022 Winter Olympics”article
• 02:3802:38, 6 February 2022 diff hist +16‎ 2022 Winter Olympics ‎ →‎Concerns and controversies: adjust content so that it better reflects what the source says
• 02:3302:33, 6 February 2022 diff hist −449‎ 2022 Winter Olympics ‎ →‎Concerns and controversies: revert edit by Dhawk790. this material is redundant as it has already been stated below (in the paragraph starting with “On 27 December 2021”)

5 February 2022

• 18:4318:43, 5 February 2022 diff hist −456‎ 2022 Winter Olympics ‎ revert edit by Dhawk790. this material appears to be given undue weight particularly in the way its been presented and also would appear to be more appropriate for another section namely the “United States diplomatic boycott”section in the “Concerns and controversies at the 2022 Winter Olympics”article where this aspect of the boycott could be explained in full rather than in part as a footnote. Please dont revert and discuss on the talk page first as you’ve been reverted wp:brd
• 18:4118:41, 5 February 2022 diff hist −456‎ 2022 Winter Olympics opening ceremony ‎ revert edit by Dhawk790. this material appears to be given undue weight particularly in the way its been presented and also would appear to be more appropriate for another section namely the “United States diplomatic boycott”section in the “Concerns and controversies at the 2022 Winter Olympics”article where this aspect of the boycott could be explained in full rather than in part as a footnote. Please dont revert again and discuss on the talk page first as you’ve been reverted twice now wp:brd
• 17:4217:42, 5 February 2022 diff hist −2,007‎ User talk:Estnot ‎ →‎ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
• 17:4217:42, 5 February 2022 diff hist −1,905‎ User talk:Estnot ‎ →‎November 2021: read and understood
• 17:4117:41, 5 February 2022 diff hist +219‎ User talk:Estnot ‎ →‎Proposal for removing a website from blacklist
• 17:2917:29, 5 February 2022 diff hist −487‎ 2022 Winter Olympics ‎ →‎Concerns and controversies: revert edits by user WesternChristianitytestballi (wp:sockstrike)
• 17:2817:28, 5 February 2022 diff hist −334‎ 2022 Winter Olympics ‎ →‎Concerns and controversies: revert edits by user WesternChristianitytestballi (wp:sockstrike)
• 17:2417:24, 5 February 2022 diff hist +464‎ 2022 Winter Olympics ‎ →‎Non-boycotting countries: Revert edits by Angele201002. the sources makes it fairly clear that they are not attending. Please do not revert and discuss on the talk page first as you are the one who has been reverted wp:brd
• 17:1417:14, 5 February 2022 diff hist −411‎ 2022 Winter Olympics opening ceremony ‎ →‎Non-boycotting countries: →‎Non-boycotting countries: revert edits by user WesternChristianitytestballi (wp:sockstrike)
• 17:1317:13, 5 February 2022 diff hist −304‎ 2022 Winter Olympics opening ceremony ‎ →‎Non-boycotting countries: revert edits by user WesternChristianitytestballi (wp:sockstrike)
• 15:0815:08, 5 February 2022 diff hist +656‎ User talk:WesternChristianitytestballi ‎ →‎SPI: new section
• 15:0515:05, 5 February 2022 diff hist +3,103‎ Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Destinyseeker89 ‎No edit summary
• 13:5513:55, 5 February 2022 diff hist +1,936‎ Talk:Brahma Chellaney ‎ →‎Request for Comment on Gupta and the debt trap diplomacy criticisms: new section
• 12:5112:51, 5 February 2022 diff hist +600‎ Brahma Chellaney ‎ Carrying out changes which has broadly been agreed to on the talk page
• 12:4112:41, 5 February 2022 diff hist +222‎ Talk:Brahma Chellaney ‎ →‎Discussion
• 12:3112:31, 5 February 2022 diff hist −88‎ 2022 Winter Olympics opening ceremony ‎No edit summary
• 12:2912:29, 5 February 2022 diff hist +5‎ 2022 Winter Olympics opening ceremony ‎ →‎Lighting the Cauldron: rewrote some content so that it better reflects what’s in the sources
• 12:1612:16, 5 February 2022 diff hist +1,650‎ 2022 Winter Olympics opening ceremony ‎ Undid revision 1070052506 by Porxchp772049 (talk) your criticism appears to be unfounded the sources highlight the non attendance of these select countries. Please do not revert again and discuss on the talk page first as you are the one who has been reverted twice now wp:brd Tag: Undo
• 12:0512:05, 5 February 2022 diff hist −582‎ 2022 Winter Olympics opening ceremony ‎ →‎Entry of the Olympics flag and flag raising ceremony: the content relies on a source which does not appear to be reliable
• 12:0412:04, 5 February 2022 diff hist −700‎ 2022 Winter Olympics opening ceremony ‎ →‎Tribute to the People 《致敬人民》 - transition performance: the content does not appear to be written in a neutral way and also relies on a source which does not appear to be reliable
• 12:0412:04, 5 February 2022 diff hist −1,733‎ 2022 Winter Olympics opening ceremony ‎ →‎Delivery of speeches by Cai Qi and Thomas Bach: remove a bit of bloated information and rewrote some content so that it better reflects what’s in the sources
• 11:5511:55, 5 February 2022 diff hist −781‎ 2022 Winter Olympics opening ceremony ‎ →‎Rites of spring - Countdown and countdown performance: remove a bit of bloated information and others that used what appears to be unreliable sources