User contributions for ERosa
A user with 103 edits. Account created on 16 December 2007.
3 May 2008
- 14:1814:18, 3 May 2008 diff hist +2,632 Talk:Confidence interval →Dear DCstats and ERosa
- 13:3613:36, 3 May 2008 diff hist +2,601 Talk:Confidence interval →Dear DCstats and ERosa: at least don't misrepresent the arguments
1 May 2008
- 01:0701:07, 1 May 2008 diff hist +1,486 Talk:Confidence interval →I suggest a major rewrite: A magnanimus gesture on my part if I do say so myself.
29 April 2008
- 19:0519:05, 29 April 2008 diff hist +495 Talk:Confidence interval →I suggest a major rewrite
- 18:5018:50, 29 April 2008 diff hist −10 Talk:Confidence interval →I suggest a major rewrite
- 18:5018:50, 29 April 2008 diff hist +1,571 Talk:Confidence interval →I suggest a major rewrite
- 13:2913:29, 29 April 2008 diff hist +1,553 Talk:Confidence interval →I suggest a major rewrite
28 April 2008
26 April 2008
24 April 2008
- 14:1614:16, 24 April 2008 diff hist +95 Talk:Confidence interval →I suggest a major rewrite
- 14:1514:15, 24 April 2008 diff hist +79 Confidence interval →Comparison to Bayesian interval estimates: More unsourced and misinformed entries. This is not a widely accepted distinction and the lack of citations shows it.
- 14:1114:11, 24 April 2008 diff hist +748 Talk:Confidence interval No edit summary
22 April 2008
- 02:2502:25, 22 April 2008 diff hist +28 Expected value of perfect information No edit summary
- 02:2402:24, 22 April 2008 diff hist +12 Bayesian inference No edit summary
- 02:2202:22, 22 April 2008 diff hist +130 Bayesian inference added reference for first paragraph
- 02:2002:20, 22 April 2008 diff hist +130 Expected value of perfect information added reference for first paragraph
- 02:1802:18, 22 April 2008 diff hist +130 Monte Carlo method added reference for first paragraph
- 02:1602:16, 22 April 2008 diff hist +26 Monte Carlo method →History: Rmv first line since Statistical sampling is not just another name for Monte Carlo or vice versa. Added a reference for the history.
6 April 2008
- 13:3013:30, 6 April 2008 diff hist 0 Confidence interval →Meaning and interpretation
- 13:2813:28, 6 April 2008 diff hist +145 Confidence interval →Meaning and interpretation: still in need of citations and well-defined terms.
- 13:2213:22, 6 April 2008 diff hist +219 Talk:Confidence interval →Dispute tag back
- 13:2013:20, 6 April 2008 diff hist +424 Talk:Confidence interval →I suggest a major rewrite
28 February 2008
- 21:4421:44, 28 February 2008 diff hist +684 Talk:Bayesian probability →Arbitrary section break (Confidence limits)
- 21:4021:40, 28 February 2008 diff hist +77 Talk:Bayesian probability →Arbitrary section break (Confidence limits)
- 21:4021:40, 28 February 2008 diff hist +933 Talk:Bayesian probability →Arbitrary section break (Confidence limits)
- 04:5804:58, 28 February 2008 diff hist +473 Talk:Bayesian probability →Painting a picture of too much conflict?
27 February 2008
- 23:2823:28, 27 February 2008 diff hist +356 Talk:Bayesian probability →Painting a picture of too much conflict?
- 19:2819:28, 27 February 2008 diff hist +38 Talk:Bayesian probability →Painting a picture of too much conflict?
- 19:1219:12, 27 February 2008 diff hist +700 Talk:Bayesian probability →Painting a picture of too much conflict?
- 15:4915:49, 27 February 2008 diff hist +923 Talk:Bayesian probability →Painting a picture of too much conflict?
25 February 2008
- 20:3020:30, 25 February 2008 diff hist +1,199 Talk:Bayesian probability →Painting a picture of too much conflict?
- 02:5902:59, 25 February 2008 diff hist −442 Risk →Risk vs. uncertainty: Not sure how this book on leadership applies to the subsection that defines risk vs. uncertainty. If notable enough to be in this article, then it needs separate section,
- 02:4402:44, 25 February 2008 diff hist +1,427 Talk:Bayesian probability →Painting a picture of too much conflict?
23 February 2008
- 15:2815:28, 23 February 2008 diff hist +2,504 Talk:Analytic hierarchy process →AHP Criticisms in Context
18 February 2008
- 14:1914:19, 18 February 2008 diff hist −47 Analytic hierarchy process →Criticisms: I suppose the pro-AHP's in here won't mind that I removed an incorrect reason for rank reversal, which is not mentioned elsewhere, anyway
- 06:4706:47, 18 February 2008 diff hist +121 User talk:Hubbardaie →Guess who?: new section
- 02:3002:30, 18 February 2008 diff hist +337 Talk:Analytic hierarchy process →First paragraph of Criticisms section
17 February 2008
- 21:3521:35, 17 February 2008 diff hist +146 Talk:Analytic hierarchy process →First paragraph of Criticisms section
- 21:3421:34, 17 February 2008 diff hist +1,120 Talk:Analytic hierarchy process →First paragraph of Criticisms section
- 21:2221:22, 17 February 2008 diff hist +672 Analytic hierarchy process Undid revision 192100904 by Ohio Mailman (talk)fixing undue weight to non-decision science source, Do not violate 3RR
- 14:1714:17, 17 February 2008 diff hist +1,658 Talk:Analytic hierarchy process →First paragraph of Criticisms section
- 14:0414:04, 17 February 2008 diff hist +182 Talk:Analytic hierarchy process →First paragraph of Criticisms section
- 14:0214:02, 17 February 2008 diff hist +405 Talk:Analytic hierarchy process →First paragraph of Criticisms section
- 13:5413:54, 17 February 2008 diff hist +672 Analytic hierarchy process Undid revision 192028249 by DCLawyer (talk) Rmv material irrelevant for criticisms section. Gives undue weight to proponents.
- 13:5213:52, 17 February 2008 diff hist +382 Talk:Analytic hierarchy process →First paragraph of Criticisms section
- 05:2605:26, 17 February 2008 diff hist 0 Talk:Analytic hierarchy process →First paragraph of Criticisms section
- 05:2505:25, 17 February 2008 diff hist +33 Talk:Analytic hierarchy process →First paragraph of Criticisms section
- 05:2305:23, 17 February 2008 diff hist +2,520 Talk:Analytic hierarchy process →First paragraph of Criticisms section
- 04:2804:28, 17 February 2008 diff hist +7 Talk:Analytic hierarchy process →First paragraph of Criticisms section
- 04:2104:21, 17 February 2008 diff hist +2 Talk:Analytic hierarchy process →First paragraph of Criticisms section
