User contributions for Dr. JJ
A user with 48 edits. Account created on 11 July 2006.
21 September 2006
- 15:0715:07, 21 September 2006 diff hist +37 m The Pew Charitable Trusts Added much needed clarity and definition
9 September 2006
- 15:0515:05, 9 September 2006 diff hist +8 The Pew Charitable Trusts reverted politically biased edit
26 August 2006
- 17:5417:54, 26 August 2006 diff hist +6 m The Pew Charitable Trusts corrected political designations as per their charter and activities section
22 July 2006
- 22:2422:24, 22 July 2006 diff hist +171 User talk:ILike2BeAnonymous No edit summary
- 22:2122:21, 22 July 2006 diff hist +55 Talk:An Inconvenient Truth →Bias in Scientific Basis section
- 22:2122:21, 22 July 2006 diff hist +308 Talk:An Inconvenient Truth No edit summary
- 22:1622:16, 22 July 2006 diff hist +166 An Inconvenient Truth →Scientific basis: Corrected sp and reverted personal POV to NPOV, as per Wiki policy, please read anon
- 21:5521:55, 22 July 2006 diff hist +168 m An Inconvenient Truth →Scientific basis: added NPOV language (as per Wiki policy) and reference.
21 July 2006
- 23:2523:25, 21 July 2006 diff hist +649 User talk:William M. Connolley →NPOV
20 July 2006
- 21:4921:49, 20 July 2006 diff hist +323 m Michael E. Mann added additonal info and clarity as to who said what. I will let the realclimate comment stay, since it is a political site and a political comment
- 21:0921:09, 20 July 2006 diff hist +1 m Michael E. Mann →Hockey stick: There were new hearings yesterday, perhaps you missed them on CSPAN, they also commented on "peer reviews" in this narrow subject.
- 21:0521:05, 20 July 2006 diff hist −111 Michael E. Mann Mr. C, you do realize that realclimate.org is a left wing pressure group with political bias, not suitable for a scientific subject.
- 15:5015:50, 20 July 2006 diff hist +170 m List of climate change controversies New Info on debate
- 15:0515:05, 20 July 2006 diff hist +70 m Michael E. Mann →Hockey stick: new paper
- 15:0115:01, 20 July 2006 diff hist +254 m Michael E. Mann →Hockey stick: added up to date info on the debate
- 14:5714:57, 20 July 2006 diff hist +399 Talk:Climate change →Skeptics of Global Warming
19 July 2006
- 18:4318:43, 19 July 2006 diff hist +640 Talk:Climate change →Skeptics of Global Warming
- 13:0113:01, 19 July 2006 diff hist +633 Talk:Climate change →Skeptics of Global Warming
- 12:5312:53, 19 July 2006 diff hist +1,644 Talk:Climate change →Skeptics of Global Warming
18 July 2006
- 23:3323:33, 18 July 2006 diff hist +928 Talk:Climate change →Skeptics of Global Warming
- 22:3022:30, 18 July 2006 diff hist +222 Talk:Climate change →Skeptics of Global Warming
- 20:2420:24, 18 July 2006 diff hist +43 User talk:Dr. JJ No edit summary current
- 20:2220:22, 18 July 2006 diff hist +720 User talk:Dr. JJ No edit summary
- 18:3418:34, 18 July 2006 diff hist +295 Talk:Climate change →"Are either of you two scientists?"
- 18:2818:28, 18 July 2006 diff hist +355 m Kyoto Protocol →Position of Canada: Added up to date information on the debate in Canada
- 13:0013:00, 18 July 2006 diff hist +1,970 Talk:Climate change →"Are either of you two scientists?"
- 03:2903:29, 18 July 2006 diff hist +690 User talk:Bikeable →Explicit vs. Implicit
- 03:2103:21, 18 July 2006 diff hist +519 Talk:Climate change →"Are either of you two scientists?"
17 July 2006
- 23:1923:19, 17 July 2006 diff hist +94 Talk:Climate change →"Are either of you two scientists?"
- 22:3222:32, 17 July 2006 diff hist +117 Talk:Climate change →"Are either of you two scientists?"
- 22:2922:29, 17 July 2006 diff hist −23 m Scientific consensus Sorry, but you are going to have to wait until climate change due to human CO2 is a scientific fact and proven, which you cannot do. Otherwise, it is just your POV and personal opinion, not allowed.
- 21:5621:56, 17 July 2006 diff hist −3 Scientific consensus No edit summary
- 21:4721:47, 17 July 2006 diff hist +26 User talk:Bikeable →Explicit vs. Implicit
- 21:1021:10, 17 July 2006 diff hist 0 Climate change →Alternative theories: sp
- 21:0921:09, 17 July 2006 diff hist +59 Climate change →Alternative theories: If you don't want this ad, due to your opinion, I understand, but this is a fact, whether you like it or not, are either of you two scientists???
- 21:0121:01, 17 July 2006 diff hist +126 m Climate change →Alternative theories: I think this is a valid point about her study, she did not say what % was which, and any comment mention that shows up is not sceintific research unless it deals with attrib
- 19:5619:56, 17 July 2006 diff hist +145 m Climate change →Alternative theories: adds critical info for examining her views of this issue
- 19:5219:52, 17 July 2006 diff hist +81 m Climate change →Solar variation theory: the sentence on specualtion of how large the GHG effect would be could not be found in the article, thus just POV of the poster. The new info adds scientific data.
- 19:3919:39, 17 July 2006 diff hist −22 Scientific consensus The AGW scientific debate is significantly different than evolution, there are many well respected scientists who's scientific research and data tend to cast doubt on AGW.
12 July 2006
- 16:1916:19, 12 July 2006 diff hist +21 m Ice core This adds clarity as to which way these parameters are going, very important for lay people to understand
11 July 2006
- 20:3220:32, 11 July 2006 diff hist +128 User talk:208.241.19.100 No edit summary
- 20:3020:30, 11 July 2006 diff hist 0 User talk:Dr. JJ →Headline text
- 20:2920:29, 11 July 2006 diff hist +169 User talk:Dr. JJ No edit summary
- 20:1020:10, 11 July 2006 diff hist −291 Scientific consensus This is a POV and not suitable for this subject and adds nothing except controversy.
- 20:0720:07, 11 July 2006 diff hist −481 User talk:Christopher Thomas →adminship
- 16:4016:40, 11 July 2006 diff hist +867 N User talk:Dr. JJ No edit summary
