User contributions for Descartes1979
A user with 6,356 edits. Account created on 29 July 2007.
4 October 2014
- 22:3622:36, 4 October 2014 diff hist −14,282 John Gee not really that prominent - pretty obscure actually - and are we really listing out every single paper he ever wrote?
- 22:3122:31, 4 October 2014 diff hist +16 Robert K. Ritner formatting, and rewording from initial paste
- 22:2422:24, 4 October 2014 diff hist +1,180 N Robert K. Ritner Starting article
28 March 2014
- 17:5417:54, 28 March 2014 diff hist −12 The Book of Abraham changing redirect - will add disambig link on the other page current
27 March 2014
- 20:4720:47, 27 March 2014 diff hist +973 Talk:The Book of Abraham (novel) move request
- 20:3320:33, 27 March 2014 diff hist +65 The Book of Abraham (novel) This topic is not the most common use of BOA - adding a link for now, and will seek to rename this page and fix disambig
8 July 2013
- 17:4717:47, 8 July 2013 diff hist −22 Security information management Rewording a few things to make it more readable Tag: Visual edit
- 17:3117:31, 8 July 2013 diff hist −16 Security information management "famous" is a weird term - changing to notable Tag: Visual edit
6 July 2013
- 06:0806:08, 6 July 2013 diff hist +366 User talk:ARTEST4ECHO →Deletion nomination Perfection (Latter Day Saints): new section
- 06:0706:07, 6 July 2013 diff hist −27 m User talk:FyzixFighter fixing duplicate header
- 06:0606:06, 6 July 2013 diff hist +393 User talk:FyzixFighter →Deletion nomination: new section
- 06:0106:01, 6 July 2013 diff hist +2 m User talk:74s181 fix link
- 06:0006:00, 6 July 2013 diff hist +381 User talk:Good Olfactory →Deletion nomination Perfection (Latter Day Saints): new section
- 05:5505:55, 6 July 2013 diff hist +202 User talk:74s181 →Nominating [[Perfection (Latter Day Saints) for deletion: new section
- 05:5205:52, 6 July 2013 diff hist +67 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 July 6 Adding Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perfection (Latter Day Saints)
- 05:4805:48, 6 July 2013 diff hist +1,412 N Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perfection (Latter Day Saints) Creating deletion discussion for Perfection (Latter Day Saints)
- 05:2205:22, 6 July 2013 diff hist +154 Daniel C. Peterson →Background: This is extremely relevant, and was a hot topic in the exmormon community when both of these sites were created - adding it back in
28 June 2013
- 03:1003:10, 28 June 2013 diff hist −937 User:Descartes1979 No edit summary
- 03:0603:06, 28 June 2013 diff hist +308 Talk:Kolob →Kolob is not essential doctrine RE: WHAT!!!: oh brother
- 03:0403:04, 28 June 2013 diff hist +562 Wikipedia:Non-free content review →File:Friberg Samuel the Lamanite low res.JPG: wrong again
27 June 2013
- 07:2107:21, 27 June 2013 diff hist −147 Kolob →Validity of Smith's translation of the Book of Abraham: This paragraph is a disgrace - it had no real comment on the controversy of the BOA, which is what the paragraph is supposed to be about
- 07:1407:14, 27 June 2013 diff hist −258 Kolob →Validity of Smith's translation of the Book of Abraham: widely regarded is an understatement; it IS a hypocephalus; there are no egyptologists that disagree; also, the comment about being a "small portion" is misplaced - removing it
- 07:0407:04, 27 June 2013 diff hist +1,755 Wikipedia:Non-free content review →File:Friberg Samuel the Lamanite low res.JPG: response
- 07:0207:02, 27 June 2013 diff hist +501 Talk:Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →File:Friberg Samuel the Lamanite low res.JPG: response
26 June 2013
- 21:1821:18, 26 June 2013 diff hist +525 Talk:Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →File:Friberg Samuel the Lamanite low res.JPG: responses
- 21:1021:10, 26 June 2013 diff hist 0 m Wikipedia:Non-free content review →File:Friberg Samuel the Lamanite low res.JPG: sp
- 21:0921:09, 26 June 2013 diff hist +1,487 Wikipedia:Non-free content review →File:Friberg Samuel the Lamanite low res.JPG: response
- 05:4805:48, 26 June 2013 diff hist +148 Samuel the Lamanite Undid revision 560463211 by 208.81.184.4 (talk) - yes there is - see bullet 4
- 05:3005:30, 26 June 2013 diff hist +845 Talk:Archaeology and the Book of Mormon response
- 05:2605:26, 26 June 2013 diff hist +156 Archaeology and the Book of Mormon Undid revision 561411264 by 208.81.184.4 (talk) - couldn't disagree more - see talk
- 05:2305:23, 26 June 2013 diff hist +589 Talk:Kolob →Kolob is not essential doctrine RE: WHAT!!!: response
23 June 2013
- 23:1523:15, 23 June 2013 diff hist +134 Talk:Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →File:Friberg Samuel the Lamanite low res.JPG: last note
- 23:1023:10, 23 June 2013 diff hist −189 Kolob Everything related to Mormonism is a topic of conversation with critics - this sentence is unnecessary - also it is a stretch to say it is "rarely" a topic discussion, I have heard this talked about many times in church
- 23:0423:04, 23 June 2013 diff hist +1,157 Talk:Kolob →Kolob is not essential doctrine RE: WHAT!!!: response - don't be ridiculous
18 June 2013
- 06:0106:01, 18 June 2013 diff hist +18 Samuel the Lamanite adding image
- 05:5805:58, 18 June 2013 diff hist −1,785 Samuel the Lamanite Removing the last few pieces that are unneeded - these are already summarized in the table
- 05:5505:55, 18 June 2013 diff hist −1,946 Samuel the Lamanite →Prophecies: No need to go into such gory detail - there is as much wording here as the actual verses in the BOM - let the reader go to the BOM - the table is a really good summary
- 05:5105:51, 18 June 2013 diff hist −313 Samuel the Lamanite Summarizing much better - much more consumable for the general public
- 05:4605:46, 18 June 2013 diff hist −323 Samuel the Lamanite →Prophecies: This paragraph is incomprehensible - I only know what they are talking about because I have read this part of the BOM, I imagine everyone else would be dizzy with confusion
- 05:4205:42, 18 June 2013 diff hist +300 Samuel the Lamanite more balance to the lede - this is not an article just for Mormons
- 05:3805:38, 18 June 2013 diff hist −130 Zarahemla removing this image - again speculative archaeology - in the lede we have a reference to Archaeology and the Book of Mormon if people want to dive in
- 05:3605:36, 18 June 2013 diff hist −912 Zarahemla →Story: trying again
- 05:3605:36, 18 June 2013 diff hist +5,077 Zarahemla Undid revision 560402629 by Descartes1979 (talk) - didn't mean to blank... undoing
- 05:3505:35, 18 June 2013 diff hist −5,077 Zarahemla Removing this paragraph - it speaks nothing of Zarahemla, and is all speculative archaeology - we need to point people to Archaeology and the Book of Mormon if they want to delve in that direction
- 05:3005:30, 18 June 2013 diff hist −4,279 Zarahemla →Local setting: Sorry - this is not salvageable - it is completely speculative, and all of it is original research - the only outside reference is to a fringe Mormon website that is equally as speculative - let's get some real scholars to back this up
- 05:2805:28, 18 June 2013 diff hist −402 Zarahemla There is so much original research here my head is spinning - how has this survived for so long as a valid WP entry?
- 05:2105:21, 18 June 2013 diff hist −309 Zarahemla →Story: these aren't citations about what people say, this is original research with just a bunch of references to Mormon scripture
- 05:1905:19, 18 June 2013 diff hist −218 Zarahemla →Story: Not sure how stone vs. wood is relevant - also the "exaggerated" setting? Weasel word. Also - it wasn't some mormons, it was JS himself
- 05:1105:11, 18 June 2013 diff hist −625 Zarahemla New section - and removing a pretty ridiculous paragraph in my opinion - completely speculative and the single reference is pretty suspect as well - let's get some independent research referenced here guys
- 05:0705:07, 18 June 2013 diff hist +140 Zarahemla reference to archaeology and the BOM
