User contributions for Cut card
A user with 40 edits. Account created on 16 September 2018.
8 June 2020
- 06:4706:47, 8 June 2020 diff hist −599 Public forum debate →Topics: Not necessary to add every new topic in, unless it's especially relevant or gives important context.
29 May 2020
- 23:3023:30, 29 May 2020 diff hist −456 Public forum debate →Prep Time: Removed a ridiculous list.
14 October 2019
- 21:2121:21, 14 October 2019 diff hist −138 Public forum debate →Topics: We probably don't need to add every new topic in here, unless it reflects something unique or important about PF topics.
14 February 2019
- 17:4717:47, 14 February 2019 diff hist +242 Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard →Talk:Public forum_debate#What_constitutes_excessive_detail? discussion
- 17:4717:47, 14 February 2019 diff hist +3,685 Public forum debate Undid revision 880063882 by Pinkbeast (talk) Pinkbeast has not contributed to the dispute resolution process. This lack of engagement leads me to conclude that this edit is fine, at least until Pinkbeast participates sufficiently in dispute resolution to justify its removal. Tag: Undo
- 17:4417:44, 14 February 2019 diff hist +11,873 Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard Undid revision 883241982 by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk) Undid bot action again, dispute not closed Tag: Undo
11 February 2019
- 16:3116:31, 11 February 2019 diff hist +415 Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard →Talk:Public forum_debate#What_constitutes_excessive_detail? discussion
- 16:2716:27, 11 February 2019 diff hist +11,458 Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard Undid revision 882763686 by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk) - I don't think this should've been archived, we are still waiting on Pinkbeast to respond at all Tag: Undo
5 February 2019
- 03:2303:23, 5 February 2019 diff hist +882 Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard →Talk:Public forum_debate#What_constitutes_excessive_detail? discussion
4 February 2019
- 04:3504:35, 4 February 2019 diff hist +652 Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard →Talk:Public forum_debate#What_constitutes_excessive_detail? discussion
25 January 2019
- 22:2222:22, 25 January 2019 diff hist +1,830 Talk:Public forum debate →Quibble over NSDA deciding topics
- 20:5520:55, 25 January 2019 diff hist −3 m Talk:Public forum debate →Quibble over NSDA deciding topics
- 20:5420:54, 25 January 2019 diff hist +698 Talk:Public forum debate →Quibble over NSDA deciding topics
- 18:0018:00, 25 January 2019 diff hist −25 m User talk:Pinkbeast must've added this heading by accident
- 17:5917:59, 25 January 2019 diff hist +1,014 User talk:Pinkbeast →3rd party dispute: new section
- 17:5317:53, 25 January 2019 diff hist +4,248 Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard →Talk:Public forum_debate#What_constitutes_excessive_detail?: new section
- 16:3516:35, 25 January 2019 diff hist +92 Talk:Public forum debate →Quibble over NSDA deciding topics
- 16:3516:35, 25 January 2019 diff hist +1,848 Talk:Public forum debate →Quibble over NSDA deciding topics
- 16:2016:20, 25 January 2019 diff hist +2,552 Talk:Public forum debate →What constitutes excessive detail?
- 15:2015:20, 25 January 2019 diff hist +4 Talk:Public forum debate →What constitutes excessive detail?
- 13:0513:05, 25 January 2019 diff hist +1,186 Talk:Public forum debate →Quibble over NSDA deciding topics
- 12:5612:56, 25 January 2019 diff hist +469 Talk:Public forum debate →What constitutes excessive detail?
- 04:2604:26, 25 January 2019 diff hist +553 Talk:Public forum debate →What constitutes excessive detail?
- 04:2404:24, 25 January 2019 diff hist +3,886 Talk:Public forum debate →Quibble over NSDA deciding topics
- 04:1004:10, 25 January 2019 diff hist +755 Talk:Public forum debate →What constitutes excessive detail?
24 January 2019
- 19:1319:13, 24 January 2019 diff hist +3,685 Public forum debate See discussion on talk page for more justification. I've added more information about the format and the topics. This should help people understand how PF works more effectively. Please discuss this on the talk page before snap-deleting it.
23 January 2019
- 14:0614:06, 23 January 2019 diff hist +1,830 Talk:Public forum debate →What constitutes excessive detail?
- 13:5413:54, 23 January 2019 diff hist +771 Talk:Public forum debate →Quibble over NSDA deciding topics: new section
22 January 2019
- 19:0419:04, 22 January 2019 diff hist +2 m Talk:Public forum debate →What constitutes excessive detail?
- 18:5818:58, 22 January 2019 diff hist −212 m Talk:Public forum debate →What constitutes excessive detail?
- 18:4818:48, 22 January 2019 diff hist +1,702 Talk:Public forum debate →What constitutes excessive detail?
- 18:4118:41, 22 January 2019 diff hist +234 m Public forum debate Undid revision 879666422 by Pinkbeast (talk) I find it hard to believe you read the linked page. The NSDA "release[s] the topic area," its wording committee "produce[s] two resolutions for that topic," the NSDA "release[s] the [final] resolution on the 1st of the month." Tag: Undo
- 16:2116:21, 22 January 2019 diff hist +234 m Public forum debate Added cite for the obvious resolution statement.
- 16:1016:10, 22 January 2019 diff hist +293 m Public forum debate Direct quote from cite: "Public Forum Debate has now entered its second decade as a National Speech and Debate Association debate format. It has become the most widespread form of high school debate across the nation."
- 16:0616:06, 22 January 2019 diff hist +1,044 Talk:Public forum debate →What constitutes excessive detail?: new section
22 September 2018
- 03:1303:13, 22 September 2018 diff hist +8,376 Talk:Public forum debate →Maintaining this page as a resource: new section
20 September 2018
- 12:5012:50, 20 September 2018 diff hist +18,595 Public forum debate Undid revision 860152273 by Pinkbeast (talk) This page's purpose should be to benefit the community. I find it highly ironic that on a page for debate, you lean on appeals to authority and quickly reject appeals from the DEBATE community, rather than justify removal of useful resources. Wikipedia experience does not give authority over specific subject matters, please allow the public forum community to retain this resource. Tag: Undo
18 September 2018
- 15:2315:23, 18 September 2018 diff hist +18,595 Public forum debate Undid revision 860108171 by Pinkbeast (talk). Pinkbeast has shown a clear disregard for the needs and benefits of actual public forum debaters, and seems to be in favor of repeating "clearly undue" in lieu of giving any serious reasoning behind completely deleting this valuable resource. Not only does the list help current public forum debaters and coaches, but it helps those new to the format understand resolutions that may be debated. Tag: Undo
16 September 2018
- 01:5601:56, 16 September 2018 diff hist +5,549 Public forum debate Fixed some minor inconsistencies, added some missing dates, added all resolutions from 2002-2007
- 01:3501:35, 16 September 2018 diff hist +13,046 Public forum debate Undid revision 853742353 by ZI Jony (talk) I don't know about you, but I actually currently debate and coach public forum, and this list of resolutions has been a resource that's extremely useful to me, whether for finding quick resolutions for practice debates or seeing different bases for my own resolutions. Please do not take this away. Tag: Undo
