User contributions for Clinicallytested
A user with 188 edits. Account created on 18 May 2008.
23 September 2015
- 21:1621:16, 23 September 2015 diff hist +77 m User talk:Clinicallytested added link about regular editors acting as owners of an article
- 20:5920:59, 23 September 2015 diff hist +56 m User talk:Clinicallytested added WP:NOVOTE about stonewalling
- 20:4620:46, 23 September 2015 diff hist +2,590 User talk:Clinicallytested fourth appeal for unblock
- 16:3516:35, 23 September 2015 diff hist −11 m User talk:Clinicallytested fix
- 16:3216:32, 23 September 2015 diff hist 0 m User talk:Clinicallytested typos
- 16:3116:31, 23 September 2015 diff hist +934 User talk:Clinicallytested reply to third decline
- 15:4415:44, 23 September 2015 diff hist +19 m User talk:Clinicallytested improved readability of second appeal for unblock
- 15:3115:31, 23 September 2015 diff hist +383 User talk:Clinicallytested third appeal for unblock
- 15:0815:08, 23 September 2015 diff hist +630 User talk:Clinicallytested adding Argument from authority
- 14:4214:42, 23 September 2015 diff hist +153 User talk:Clinicallytested added comparison with 9/11
- 14:3214:32, 23 September 2015 diff hist +80 m User talk:Clinicallytested fix
- 14:2714:27, 23 September 2015 diff hist +196 m User talk:Clinicallytested added plausibility comparison with Alien abductions
- 14:1814:18, 23 September 2015 diff hist +53 m User talk:Clinicallytested fix
22 September 2015
- 17:2017:20, 22 September 2015 diff hist +1 m User talk:Clinicallytested fix
21 September 2015
- 22:0422:04, 21 September 2015 diff hist +1,502 User talk:Clinicallytested relying again to the admin who declined my second appeal
- 08:3508:35, 21 September 2015 diff hist +152 User talk:Clinicallytested No edit summary
20 September 2015
- 23:0123:01, 20 September 2015 diff hist +8,933 User talk:Clinicallytested second appeal for unblock
31 July 2015
- 12:5512:55, 31 July 2015 diff hist +10 m User talk:Clinicallytested typos and fix
30 July 2015
- 08:0008:00, 30 July 2015 diff hist +3,630 User talk:Clinicallytested reply to Kuru
29 July 2015
- 17:4317:43, 29 July 2015 diff hist +139 User talk:Clinicallytested →Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion: unblock
- 17:1617:16, 29 July 2015 diff hist +49 Talk:Electronic harassment as per talk page and Administrators' noticeboard
- 17:1017:10, 29 July 2015 diff hist +555 Talk:Electronic harassment reply to Dbrodbeck
- 16:5916:59, 29 July 2015 diff hist +1,330 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:Clinicallytested reported by User:Dbrodbeck (Result: ): reply to Dbrodbeck
- 16:3016:30, 29 July 2015 diff hist +49 Talk:Electronic harassment Undid revision 673653045 by SPECIFICO (talk) that's not a good reason - you need to put things in context on the talk page - I see bad faith
- 16:2416:24, 29 July 2015 diff hist +1,117 User talk:Clinicallytested reply to LuckyLouie
- 15:4915:49, 29 July 2015 diff hist +49 Talk:Electronic harassment Undid revision 673646199 by LuckyLouie (talk) then you should reach consensus on the talk page as per WP:VOTE
- 14:3214:32, 29 July 2015 diff hist +49 Talk:Electronic harassment Undid revision 673637942 by Dbrodbeck (talk) harassment is punishable by law - the prominent view of WP:RS is unalignment thus why it's part of the Crime project (since 2010 by the way)
- 14:0414:04, 29 July 2015 diff hist +49 Talk:Electronic harassment Undid revision 673616699 by Kolbasz (talk) the WP:RS revolve around a purpoted crime - did you read at least the first sentence of the page? - quit this ridiculous POV pushing
- 07:3807:38, 29 July 2015 diff hist −12 m Talk:Electronic harassment threading
- 07:3107:31, 29 July 2015 diff hist +49 Talk:Electronic harassment WP:NPOV - it's a purpoted crime not a purpoted illness
28 July 2015
- 17:4317:43, 28 July 2015 diff hist +2,110 Talk:Electronic harassment replies to LuckyLouie and SPECIFICO
- 11:3411:34, 28 July 2015 diff hist +1 m Talk:Electronic harassment typo
- 11:2411:24, 28 July 2015 diff hist +130 m Talk:Electronic harassment minor improvement
- 11:2011:20, 28 July 2015 diff hist +152 m Talk:Electronic harassment minor improvement
- 11:1411:14, 28 July 2015 diff hist +9 m Talk:Electronic harassment minor improvement
- 10:5910:59, 28 July 2015 diff hist +17 m Talk:Electronic harassment minor improvement
- 10:3510:35, 28 July 2015 diff hist −445 m Talk:Electronic harassment squeezing to what is noteworthy
- 10:2910:29, 28 July 2015 diff hist +231 m Talk:Electronic harassment underline references and generally small improvement
- 09:1609:16, 28 July 2015 diff hist +5 m Talk:Electronic harassment small improvement
- 08:3408:34, 28 July 2015 diff hist +3 m Talk:Electronic harassment typo
- 08:2308:23, 28 July 2015 diff hist +148 m Talk:Electronic harassment typos and small improvement
- 07:5707:57, 28 July 2015 diff hist +4,678 Talk:Electronic harassment new section - Its definition (references' dissection)
23 July 2015
- 01:5801:58, 23 July 2015 diff hist −164 Cyberbullying Undid revision 672659318 by LuckyLouie (talk) - correcting overly broad definition
22 July 2015
- 22:5822:58, 22 July 2015 diff hist −164 Cyberbullying it's not mandatory that a reliable source has to be chosen to describe something, only that it's eligible to
- 22:3322:33, 22 July 2015 diff hist +9 m Electronic harassment there's also bullying in information technology - thus it's better to draw the line adding the word "networks"
- 20:2820:28, 22 July 2015 diff hist +1,584 Talk:Electronic harassment replies to both AndyTheGrump and Dbrobeck
- 19:1719:17, 22 July 2015 diff hist +1 m Talk:Electronic harassment typo
- 19:1619:16, 22 July 2015 diff hist +356 Talk:Electronic harassment reply to AndyTheGrump's comment
- 19:0119:01, 22 July 2015 diff hist +659 Talk:Electronic harassment reply to Dbrodbeck's comment
- 18:3018:30, 22 July 2015 diff hist +381 Talk:Electronic harassment reply to AndyTheGrump's comment
