User contributions for Atrapalhado

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

10:1510:15, 16 May 2024 diff hist +78‎ From my cold, dead hands ‎ Restructuring current Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
08:2908:29, 16 May 2024 diff hist +305‎ From my cold, dead hands ‎ Correcting info as per senate sub committee source cited Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

20:3920:39, 15 May 2024 diff hist +111‎ Paul Mason (journalist) ‎ →‎Politics: Confirmed Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
20:3620:36, 15 May 2024 diff hist +74‎ Paul Mason (journalist) ‎ →‎Politics: No confirmation Corbyn will run as an independent Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

10:2010:20, 13 May 2024 diff hist −253‎ From my cold, dead hands ‎ unsourced statement, contradicted by previous sentence Tag: 2017 wikitext editor

21:1821:18, 10 May 2024 diff hist −69‎ Gentile ‎ Rewording not supported by cited sources. Undid revision 1223225237 by 72.203.76.157 (talk) Tags: Undo Reverted

09:4809:48, 9 May 2024 diff hist −56‎ Purí people ‎ Not extinct. People of Puri descent are reclaiming the identity - see references cited in the article. 675 people identified as Puri in the 2010 census. "Extinct people" is a rather colonial concept really. Tag: 2017 wikitext editor

21:5821:58, 4 May 2024 diff hist −110‎ Barnt Green House ‎ Unsourced content and doesn't make sense: tudorbethan style was early 20th c. current Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

18:5418:54, 3 May 2024 diff hist +246‎ Personal relationships of James VI and I ‎ Read the rest of the para, indeed the rest of the article! The rest of the para and article argues that James's sexuality IS important. This one sentence is important for npov because it reflects the views of commentators who take different virwest of this paragraph balances this sentence by providing the alternativeUndid revision 1222040296 by Kj106 (talk) Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

10:1910:19, 30 April 2024 diff hist +73‎ George Villiers, 1st Duke of Buckingham ‎ Better source for reference Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
10:1610:16, 30 April 2024 diff hist −271‎ Personal relationships of James VI and I ‎ →‎Views of modern historians: Removing Radio Times article reference. Not a massively credible source and may have been influenced by this article. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

08:3908:39, 29 April 2024 diff hist +5‎ George Villiers, 1st Duke of Buckingham ‎ whether minor gentry is "modest" or not depends where you're looking at it from. Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
08:2208:22, 29 April 2024 diff hist +1,028‎ George Villiers, 1st Duke of Buckingham ‎ replacing absurdly coy text with a more accurate statement Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
08:1208:12, 29 April 2024 diff hist +40‎ Personal relationships of James VI and I ‎No edit summary Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
07:5207:52, 29 April 2024 diff hist +118‎ Personal relationships of James VI and I ‎ blue links in caption Tag: 2017 wikitext editor

09:0809:08, 26 April 2024 diff hist −10‎ Gentile ‎ Note the word "usually" in this sentence. The older and wider meanings of gentile are explored in the article. But - in line with all modern dictionaries - the principal modern meaning is "not Jewish" and this is what the first line should reflect. To further clarify I have added "today." Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

14:5514:55, 22 April 2024 diff hist −164‎ Personal relationships of James VI and I ‎ →‎Views of modern historians Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
14:5314:53, 22 April 2024 diff hist +336‎ Personal relationships of James VI and I ‎ →‎Views on James' sexual behaviour Tag: 2017 wikitext editor

15:2515:25, 21 April 2024 diff hist −5‎ Anal sex ‎ Vandalism current Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

15:2015:20, 20 April 2024 diff hist −8‎ Personal relationships of James VI and I ‎ →‎Views of modern historians: Reference Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
15:0615:06, 20 April 2024 diff hist +245‎ Personal relationships of James VI and I ‎ Undid revision 1219896335 by 24.0.151.184 text is npov and correctly referenced. Important to reflect argument that james sexuality is not in itself an important topic. Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

16:0916:09, 19 April 2024 diff hist −2,956‎ Personal relationships of James VI and I ‎ Kind of radical, won't be offended if this change is undone. Idea is to move the very good para summarising views of several modern historians much higher up the article. And I'm deleting the detailed account of historiography 1960s-1990s: it's not really needed and it's mostly based on one source. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
11:2411:24, 19 April 2024 diff hist +558‎ Personal relationships of James VI and I ‎ →‎Overview: I know this needs references which I will add but I think this is what this para needs to say. It's not correct to imply as we did previously that earlier historians just ignored James sexuality Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
10:4910:49, 19 April 2024 diff hist −426‎ Personal relationships of James VI and I ‎ →‎Overview: Making some cuts for length, readability and reduce excessive reliance/citation of one source Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

14:2114:21, 14 April 2024 diff hist +3,448‎ Protógenes Queiroz ‎ Vandalism Undid revision 1218867063 by Golidius.godwine (talk) current Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
14:2114:21, 14 April 2024 diff hist +302‎ Protógenes Queiroz ‎ Vandalism Undid revision 1218867175 by Golidius.godwine (talk) Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

19:0119:01, 13 April 2024 diff hist +4,196‎ Personal relationships of James VI and I ‎ Unreferenced, extensive changes, edit warring. Undid revision 1218698490 by 110.141.16.239 (talk) Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

07:0807:08, 8 April 2024 diff hist +193‎ Personal relationships of James VI and I ‎ Restoring more content that anonymous IP contributor had deleted. Quite frustrating given detailed work over past months by several editors to make this a carefully balanced, fully referenced article. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

10:4810:48, 7 April 2024 diff hist −42‎ Personal relationships of James VI and I ‎ Undoing more dubious edits from anonymous IP controbutor Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
10:2610:26, 7 April 2024 diff hist +35‎ Personal relationships of James VI and I ‎ Further clearing up mess left by anonymous IP contributor Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
10:2410:24, 7 April 2024 diff hist −149‎ Personal relationships of James VI and I ‎ Cutting further unreferenced not npov changes made by anonymous IP contributor Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
10:2310:23, 7 April 2024 diff hist −987‎ Personal relationships of James VI and I ‎ Cut newly added text by anonymous IP user. Totally unreferenced, not npov, contradicts rest of article and too detailed for intro paras. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

12:0212:02, 23 March 2024 diff hist −24‎ George Villiers, 1st Duke of Buckingham ‎ No sorry this statement is not #npov. It's a fact that your source said it so say "so and so says it's historically inaccurate" but you should balance that with other reviews/commentwry. Undid revision 1215142813 by Sweetpool50 (talk) Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

15:1115:11, 21 March 2024 diff hist −8‎ George Villiers, 1st Duke of Buckingham ‎ referencing Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
15:0515:05, 21 March 2024 diff hist +373‎ George Villiers, 1st Duke of Buckingham ‎ Referencing Tags: use of deprecated (unreliable) source 2017 wikitext editor
15:0015:00, 21 March 2024 diff hist +391‎ George Villiers, 1st Duke of Buckingham ‎No edit summary Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
14:5214:52, 21 March 2024 diff hist +163‎ George Villiers, 1st Duke of Buckingham ‎ Undid revision 1214817686 by Sweetpool50 (talk) I will add citation. Are you aware of the "Citation Needed" tag? It's useful in these cases where info is unlikely to be wrong, and less discouraging for other editors. Tag: Undo

09:4509:45, 20 March 2024 diff hist −130‎ Earl of Desmond ‎ →‎Barons Desmond (1259): Oh dear current Tags: Manual revert Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

11:5811:58, 19 March 2024 diff hist −219‎ Cayman Islands Civil Service College ‎ Clearly notable and should not be deleted. This is the main civil service training institute in Cayman Islands. News sources refer extensively to this. Article needs sources obvs Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

23:3623:36, 17 March 2024 diff hist −5‎ Anal sex ‎ If you've got an argument for this engage on the talk page. Undid revision 1214256406 by JobsWorth7 (talk) Tags: Undo Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

15:2315:23, 15 March 2024 diff hist −139‎ Anal sex ‎ →‎Cultural views: point already covered in the correct section, on ancient cultures. I have moved supporting reference to there Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit
15:1615:16, 15 March 2024 diff hist −164‎ Anal sex ‎ →‎Cultural views: removing sentence so vague as to be wrong/ meaningless. celibacy was a priestly requirement through 900 or so years of the middle ages. when/how/who were the celibate priests accused of anal sex? Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit

22:1722:17, 13 March 2024 diff hist −119‎ Anal sex ‎ →‎Cultural views: bizarre and sexist statement not supported by source. there really is a lot of nonsense in this article. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit
16:3416:34, 13 March 2024 diff hist −1,173‎ Anal sex ‎ →‎Western cultures: The specific views of two men from the 1940s do not belong in a summary of attitudes to anal sex in western civilization (once again this was an effort to steer the article to talk about MSM NOT having anal sex - a point already properly covered in the relevant section). Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
07:3007:30, 13 March 2024 diff hist −289‎ Anal sex ‎ →‎Islam: Quote marks fully appropriate here to show "unnatural" is not the terminology of the article. Also cut sentence that makes no sense (at least without considerable better explanation). Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

22:3122:31, 12 March 2024 diff hist +548‎ Talk:Anal sex ‎ →‎'male' penis: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit

02:1802:18, 6 March 2024 diff hist −311‎ Personal relationships of James VI and I ‎ →‎Views on James' sexual behaviour: typo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit

16 May 2024

15 May 2024

13 May 2024

10 May 2024

9 May 2024

4 May 2024

3 May 2024

30 April 2024

29 April 2024

26 April 2024

22 April 2024

21 April 2024

20 April 2024

19 April 2024

14 April 2024

13 April 2024

8 April 2024

7 April 2024

23 March 2024

21 March 2024

20 March 2024

19 March 2024

17 March 2024

15 March 2024

13 March 2024

12 March 2024

6 March 2024

4 March 2024