User contributions for Achromatic

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

02:4002:40, 24 August 2016 diff hist +23‎ m List of fastest production cars by acceleration ‎ Added Ludicrous Upgrade
02:3902:39, 24 August 2016 diff hist −220‎ List of fastest production cars by acceleration ‎ This is getting crazy. The citation for the independently verified time for the 2016 P100D is taken from a review of the 2015 P90D extrapolated to that year's P100D. An independent or even manu verified time will come, til then this is a press release
02:3502:35, 24 August 2016 diff hist +477‎ User talk:Shaggydan ‎ →‎Your edits at List of fastest production cars by acceleration: new section

21:4121:41, 23 August 2016 diff hist −579‎ List of fastest production cars by acceleration ‎ Again, please refer to the Talk page. When the Tesla P100D time is verified and not announced as an "expected performance" in a press release. There's no objection to it being where it belongs - _when_ this is the case
20:2420:24, 23 August 2016 diff hist −602‎ List of fastest production cars by acceleration ‎ Please look at the Talk page. Again, this is NOT a verified timing. It is, by Tesla's OWN WORDS, "expected" performance, and by that standard, does not meet the article's requirements for inclusion, at least not yet.
20:2220:22, 23 August 2016 diff hist +733‎ Talk:List of fastest production cars by acceleration ‎ →‎Discussion of Tesla: new section
20:1020:10, 23 August 2016 diff hist −85‎ List of fastest production cars by acceleration ‎ Similar to previous. This is not a verified timing, only projected/expected.
20:0920:09, 23 August 2016 diff hist −340‎ List of fastest production cars by acceleration ‎ Removed Tesla. This is not a verified timing, by either the manufacturer or third party, but rather the projected/"expected" performance of a future release/update.

01:2801:28, 26 May 2013 diff hist +28‎ Neil Clark Warren ‎ Tagged per blatantly promotional and overly positive tone.

17:3917:39, 9 March 2010 diff hist −253‎ Language Integrated Query ‎ →‎External links: Removed ORM Battle site, which does indeed appear to be a fairly thinly veiled promotional tool for the site owner's commercial product.

23:0623:06, 16 February 2010 diff hist −12‎ Caddie ‎ Removed unencyclopedic phrasing

01:2001:20, 7 January 2010 diff hist +15‎ CCP Games ‎ Tagged, specifically for Recruitment.

07:2607:26, 21 December 2009 diff hist −1,177‎ Cinemax ‎ Removed 'carriage controversies' - failing to add one channel mentioned in a press release is hardly a 'controversy', and of dubious note. Irrelevant is the second para about other channels and HD

23:2523:25, 20 December 2009 diff hist −319‎ Fisting ‎ Removed this claim, a 'guide to fisting' from an adult site is not a WP:RS

19:1119:11, 7 December 2009 diff hist +16‎ Hockey (band) ‎ Tagged for overly promotional tones, corrected some grammar.
06:3906:39, 7 December 2009 diff hist −965‎ Pre-hospital trauma assessment ‎ →‎Ongoing assessment: Fixed grammar and stripped a large chunk of text that was largely presumptuous of a certain set of criteria.