User contributions for 76.143.192.237

8 September 2023

• 03:1103:11, 8 September 2023 diff hist 0‎ User talk:76.143.192.237 ‎ BBB23 IS BEING DISRUPTIVE BY TRYING TO HIDE MY EXPLANATION AT https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=1174380254&oldid=1174378680
• 03:1003:10, 8 September 2023 diff hist −2‎ User talk:76.143.192.237 ‎No edit summary
• 03:1003:10, 8 September 2023 diff hist +195‎ User talk:76.143.192.237 ‎No edit summary
• 03:0903:09, 8 September 2023 diff hist +261‎ User talk:76.143.192.237 ‎ Wikpedia policy says it is disruptive to remove good information and be harmful to the pages. THEY were being disruptive not me
• 03:0603:06, 8 September 2023 diff hist +42‎ User talk:76.143.192.237 ‎ nothing I did was disruptive
• 02:3602:36, 8 September 2023 diff hist +277‎ Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ‎ →‎User:170.231.85.108: Reply Tags: Reverted Reply
• 02:3502:35, 8 September 2023 diff hist +424‎ Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ‎ →‎User:170.231.85.108: Reply Tags: Reverted Reply

7 September 2023

• 21:3521:35, 7 September 2023 diff hist +638‎ Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ‎ →‎User:170.231.85.108: Reply Tag: Reply
• 21:3221:32, 7 September 2023 diff hist +385‎ September 12 ‎ Undid revision 1174337372 by CycloneYoris (talk) source took less than 5 seconds to identify from bio and copy in. This lazy "sneaky vandalism" needs to stop.
• 21:3121:31, 7 September 2023 diff hist +412‎ November 28 ‎ Undid revision 1174341161 by Bruce1ee (talk) source took less than 5 seconds to copy from the bio. This lazy "sneaky vandalism" deletion of good edits needs to stop.
• 20:4020:40, 7 September 2023 diff hist +790‎ User talk:JavaHurricane ‎No edit summary Tag: Reverted
• 20:3520:35, 7 September 2023 diff hist +659‎ User talk:Hyphenation Expert ‎ →‎Removal of births or deaths: Reply Tag: Reply
• 20:3020:30, 7 September 2023 diff hist +535‎ Wikipedia:Help desk ‎ →‎Wikipedia rejects sources for being "Paywalled"? That seems ridiculous, most public newspapers of record have paywalls.: Reply Tag: Reply
• 20:2720:27, 7 September 2023 diff hist +717‎ User talk:JBW ‎ →‎november edits.: Reply Tag: Reply
• 20:1920:19, 7 September 2023 diff hist +639‎ November 26 ‎ Undid revision 1174324342 by Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300 (talk) seriously? It would have taken you 2 seconds to copy a reference. This is just lazy.
• 15:3615:36, 7 September 2023 diff hist +253‎ Talk:Ken Paxton ‎ →‎Article introduction: Reply Tag: Reply
• 15:1815:18, 7 September 2023 diff hist +319‎ User talk:ToadetteEdit ‎ →‎Read up on policy please.: new section Tag: New topic
• 15:0315:03, 7 September 2023 diff hist +534‎ User talk:Shadow311 ‎ →‎October 8: Reply Tag: Reply
• 14:5814:58, 7 September 2023 diff hist +545‎ Wikipedia:Help desk ‎ →‎Wikipedia rejects sources for being "Paywalled"? That seems ridiculous, most public newspapers of record have paywalls.: Reply Tag: Reply
• 14:5614:56, 7 September 2023 diff hist +371‎ User talk:Shadow311 ‎ →‎October 8: new section Tag: New topic
• 14:5514:55, 7 September 2023 diff hist +290‎ User talk:76.143.192.237 ‎ →‎September 2023: Reply Tag: Reply
• 14:5414:54, 7 September 2023 diff hist +160‎ User talk:76.143.192.237 ‎ →‎Edit summary: Reply Tag: Reply
• 14:5314:53, 7 September 2023 diff hist +287‎ October 8 ‎ Undid revision 1174292382 by Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300 (talk) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability#Access_to_sources "Do not reject reliable sources just because they are difficult or costly to access." The source is fine, the Times has been a newspaper of record since 1785. Tag: Undo
• 14:4714:47, 7 September 2023 diff hist +904‎ Wikipedia:Help desk ‎ →‎Wikipedia rejects sources for being "Paywalled"? That seems ridiculous, most public newspapers of record have paywalls.: new section Tag: New topic
• 14:4314:43, 7 September 2023 diff hist +287‎ October 8 ‎ Undid revision 1174283427 by ToadetteEdit (talk) "source is paywalled" is not a valid reason to reject a source of record. Tags: Undo Reverted
• 12:5212:52, 7 September 2023 diff hist +287‎ October 8 ‎ Undid revision 1174187179 by Hyphenation Expert (talk) dude STOP VANDALIZING WIKIPEDIA. If you need a cite just copy it from the source where it was rather than vandalizing. Tag: Reverted
• 12:5012:50, 7 September 2023 diff hist +370‎ User talk:Ivanvector ‎ →‎Birth/Deaths and Thanks: new section Tag: New topic
• 12:4812:48, 7 September 2023 diff hist +230‎ October 22 ‎ Undid revision 1174187288 by Bruce1ee (talk) dude it's easier to copy a citation in than to vandalize wikipedia Tag: Reverted
• 12:4412:44, 7 September 2023 diff hist +301‎ Wikipedia:Help desk ‎ →‎Someone randomly removing birth and death dates from pages: Reply Tag: Reply

6 September 2023

• 21:3021:30, 6 September 2023 diff hist +369‎ User talk:M.boli ‎ →‎Ken Paxton: Reply Tag: Reply
• 21:2821:28, 6 September 2023 diff hist +24‎ Wikipedia:Help desk ‎ →‎Someone randomly removing birth and death dates from pages
• 21:2721:27, 6 September 2023 diff hist +61‎ Wikipedia:Help desk ‎ →‎Someone randomly removing birth and death dates from pages
• 21:2521:25, 6 September 2023 diff hist +309‎ Wikipedia:Help desk ‎ →‎Someone randomly removing birth and death dates from pages: Reply Tag: Reply
• 21:2321:23, 6 September 2023 diff hist +250‎ User talk:M.boli ‎ →‎Ken Paxton: new section Tag: New topic
• 21:2221:22, 6 September 2023 diff hist +187‎ Talk:Ken Paxton ‎ →‎Article introduction: requesting M.boli fix one other missing thing that is in talk page consensus
• 21:2021:20, 6 September 2023 diff hist +172‎ Talk:Ken Paxton ‎ →‎Article introduction: Reply Tag: Reply
• 21:1721:17, 6 September 2023 diff hist +214‎ Talk:Ken Paxton ‎ →‎Article introduction: Reply Tag: Reply
• 21:1621:16, 6 September 2023 diff hist +1,010‎ Wikipedia:Help desk ‎ →‎Someone randomly removing birth and death dates from pages: new section Tag: New topic
• 21:1121:11, 6 September 2023 diff hist +369‎ User talk:Hyphenation Expert ‎ →‎Removal of births or deaths: new section Tag: New topic
• 21:0921:09, 6 September 2023 diff hist +76‎ December 24 ‎ Undid revision 1174182317 by Hyphenation Expert (talk)it does not appear this needs citation, it can easily be checked against the linked article. Tags: Undo Reverted Non-autoconfirmed user rapidly reverting edits
• 21:0921:09, 6 September 2023 diff hist +79‎ November 12 ‎ Undid revision 1174182404 by Hyphenation Expert (talk)it does not appear this needs citation, it can easily be checked against the linked article. Tags: Undo Reverted Non-autoconfirmed user rapidly reverting edits
• 21:0921:09, 6 September 2023 diff hist +87‎ November 26 ‎ Undid revision 1174182477 by Hyphenation Expert (talk)it does not appear this needs citation, it can easily be checked against the linked article. Tags: Undo Reverted
• 21:0821:08, 6 September 2023 diff hist +58‎ October 22 ‎ Undid revision 1174182536 by Hyphenation Expert (talk) it does not appear this needs citation, it can easily be checked against the linked article. Tags: Undo Reverted
• 21:0721:07, 6 September 2023 diff hist +40‎ Ken Paxton ‎ Undid revision 1174183033 by Hyphenation Expert (talk) removal does not follow talk consensus Tags: Undo Reverted
• 21:0521:05, 6 September 2023 diff hist +217‎ Talk:Ken Paxton ‎ →‎impeachment paragraph in lead: Reply Tag: Reply
• 20:4620:46, 6 September 2023 diff hist +262‎ Talk:Ken Paxton ‎ →‎Deletion of description as lawyer?: Reply Tag: Reply
• 20:3920:39, 6 September 2023 diff hist +369‎ Talk:Ken Paxton ‎ →‎Deletion of description as lawyer?: new section Tag: New topic
• 20:3720:37, 6 September 2023 diff hist +50‎ Ken Paxton ‎ Restore wording as talk page consensus, sourcing is given. Reviewing page history, guessing that this deletion was missed in the confusion when Drmies was dealing with vandalism. Tag: Reverted