User contributions for 71.197.183.28

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

21:0721:07, 28 October 2010 diff hist −578‎ Hirohito ‎ →‎Apology rebuffed: If adding back, what consequences? What opportunities? Be specific, as inference is not an encyclopedic method of exposition. ~~~~davepl
19:5719:57, 28 October 2010 diff hist +306‎ Talk:Suzan DelBene ‎ →‎Founded Drugstore.com? Why does the Drugstore.com article disagree?: new section

19:0519:05, 4 October 2010 diff hist +352‎ Talk:The Social Network ‎ →‎Positive reviews are not "Acclaim"
04:1604:16, 4 October 2010 diff hist −819‎ The Social Network ‎ →‎Response: I removed a section that really belongs (if even warranted) in Lessig's bio. It's a statement of what this film is -not- about. It's -not- about a lot of things, not to be listed here
04:1304:13, 4 October 2010 diff hist −21‎ The Social Network ‎ The film's been out for two days. Let's hold off on the "critical acclaim" until we have some perspective. ~~~~davepl

20:4720:47, 17 August 2010 diff hist −45‎ Conrad Black ‎ Peacock prose - you cannot say his "factual rigour is beyond dispute" unless you can demonstrate that he is 100% accurate and everyone agrees, which you cannot.
01:4301:43, 17 August 2010 diff hist +371‎ Talk:Nuclear summer ‎ →‎hpoytetical adaptated species

19:4719:47, 30 October 2009 diff hist +544‎ Talk:William S. Sessions ‎No edit summary
19:3919:39, 30 October 2009 diff hist −160‎ William S. Sessions ‎ →‎FBI career: I took out the "widely believed" and the unsourced "cleared of wrongdoing". That kind of thing can't be in there without a reference.