User contributions for 70.66.167.249

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

22:1522:15, 10 April 2008 diff hist +714‎ Talk:Robert Latimer ‎ Questioning the rationale for excluding expert medical testimony !
21:4621:46, 10 April 2008 diff hist +25‎ Robert Latimer ‎ Again, quoting from the Supreme Court judgment.
21:1421:14, 10 April 2008 diff hist +159‎ Robert Latimer ‎ Contrary to the Crown prosecutors' brief, the Supreme Court determined that Tracy's pain was "CONSTANT"

00:5800:58, 7 April 2008 diff hist −1,128‎ Robert Latimer ‎ Don't you dare talk about being constructive. Your edits are both deceitful and destructive.
00:5200:52, 7 April 2008 diff hist −336‎ Robert Latimer ‎No edit summary
00:4900:49, 7 April 2008 diff hist +1‎ Robert Latimer ‎No edit summary
00:4800:48, 7 April 2008 diff hist +1‎ Robert Latimer ‎No edit summary
00:4800:48, 7 April 2008 diff hist +1‎ Robert Latimer ‎No edit summary
00:4600:46, 7 April 2008 diff hist −3,329‎ Robert Latimer ‎ Slp1 - Your editing is deceitful and malicious, and your excuses are absolutely disgusting

21:1121:11, 27 March 2008 diff hist +346‎ Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard ‎ →‎Gothamist LLC blogs
02:1902:19, 27 March 2008 diff hist +700‎ Robert Latimer ‎ Correcting deceitful anti-Latimer edits with complete, documented, factual and PERTINENT information. STOP TAMPERING WITH THE TRUTH.

19:5619:56, 26 March 2008 diff hist +700‎ Robert Latimer ‎ Replacing a previous edit, which grossly understated the severity of Tracy's condition, with complete, documented, factual, and important information.

22:4922:49, 25 March 2008 diff hist +68‎ Robert Latimer ‎ Clarification as to Dr. Dzus' legal role at trial.

16:2516:25, 22 March 2008 diff hist +89‎ Robert Latimer ‎ Let the readers decide which version they want to believe - your creative editing or the Supreme Court of Canada

22:5822:58, 21 March 2008 diff hist +698‎ Robert Latimer ‎ To balance creative editing with factual information. Please note that the Crown prosecutors' anti-Latimerr brief was also quoted verbatim.

21:5721:57, 20 March 2008 diff hist +12‎ Robert Latimer ‎No edit summary
21:5021:50, 20 March 2008 diff hist +128‎ Robert Latimer ‎ Clarification for lay readers

18:5418:54, 19 March 2008 diff hist −1‎ Robert Latimer ‎ Typo
18:5318:53, 19 March 2008 diff hist −8‎ Robert Latimer ‎ Another attempt to correct just small segment of the blatant and malicious anti-Latrimer bias which permeates this article
00:3800:38, 19 March 2008 diff hist +595‎ Robert Latimer ‎ Attempt to correct just a small portion of the blatant anti-Latimer bias which permeates this article.