User contributions for 66.149.58.8

2 April 2011

• 01:2201:22, 2 April 2011 diff hist +7‎ Monorail ‎ →‎1900s-1950s: This isn't defined anywhere else on the page!

6 February 2011

• 17:0417:04, 6 February 2011 diff hist +524‎ User talk:66.149.58.8 ‎ →‎February 2011
• 14:5614:56, 6 February 2011 diff hist +476‎ User talk:66.149.58.8 ‎ →‎February 2011: Context to a bizarre warning
• 14:4614:46, 6 February 2011 diff hist +324‎ User talk:T3dkjn89q00vl02Cxp1kqs3x7 ‎ →‎AAC: new section
• 14:4314:43, 6 February 2011 diff hist +128‎ Napster (streaming service) ‎ WTF? Yes, it's true. Here's an idea: why don't you actually look it up before deleting good information and replacing it with uncited bogus information?

5 February 2011

• 19:3619:36, 5 February 2011 diff hist −8‎ Napster (streaming service) ‎ Not sure why this was changed back,. Rhapsody really hasn't used WMA for a very long time now. Their base product is uses 64kbps AAC+

3 January 2011

• 02:4402:44, 3 January 2011 diff hist +1,098‎ Talk:Wired (website) ‎ →‎Wikileaks/Wired/Pvt Bradley Manning Controversy.: This is a controversy about Wired.com that's attracted international media attention, and you think it shouldn't be mentioned?!
• 02:3802:38, 3 January 2011 diff hist +1,734‎ Wired (website) ‎ Add additional information concerning scandal.

2 January 2011

• 21:0221:02, 2 January 2011 diff hist +225‎ Wired (website) ‎ rv: this isn't about wikileaks, it's about a specific journalism scandal involving Wired.com

29 December 2010

• 19:3419:34, 29 December 2010 diff hist +207‎ Wired (website) ‎ rv: major controversy which specifically is about Wired News. Added {{expand}} tag.

24 December 2010

• 02:1302:13, 24 December 2010 diff hist +12‎ Napster (streaming service) ‎ Rhapsody uses AAC+, not WMA. I believe they stopped some time around 2008.
• 02:0902:09, 24 December 2010 diff hist +62‎ Comparison of digital music stores ‎ Rhapsody hasn't used WMA/Playsforsure for a while. Actually even this link is probably outdated, I believe they're using a mixture of Flash DRM and DNA, but can't find a link

6 November 2010

• 13:5013:50, 6 November 2010 diff hist +289‎ Talk:E-UTRA ‎ →‎Renaming of HSOPA to E-UTRA: Agree

21 October 2010

• 01:4001:40, 21 October 2010 diff hist +17‎ Ildico ‎ Currently forwards to fictional character. This link doesn't exist but it at least could be created. Tag: unusual redirect

18 September 2010

• 22:3922:39, 18 September 2010 diff hist +139‎ Talk:Solanum viarum ‎ →‎Question: new section

15 August 2010

• 15:3215:32, 15 August 2010 diff hist −235‎ Damn Nation ‎ Removed gibberish, see Talk:Damn_Nation Tag: section blanking

2 August 2010

• 23:5123:51, 2 August 2010 diff hist +275‎ Talk:Damn Nation ‎ →‎Plot summary: new section

25 July 2010

• 18:1718:17, 25 July 2010 diff hist +40‎ Android Market ‎ →‎Security: This is more accurate. Installing an app is an on/off thing, you can't say "I want to install XYZ, but I don't want it to make phone calls"
• 18:1318:13, 25 July 2010 diff hist −14‎ Android (operating system) ‎ →‎Issues concerning application development: JavaME has already been covered (and is irrelevant to paragraph), third party video-conferencing is an "although" not a "Additionally"

19 July 2010

• 21:4021:40, 19 July 2010 diff hist −36‎ Google Voice ‎ →‎Origin: Looks to me like the later references (such as the Salon article mentioned two sentences later) already affirm this statement.

15 July 2010

• 19:3019:30, 15 July 2010 diff hist +400‎ Talk:WebOS ‎ →‎How open is the system?: Hmmm, scary!

11 July 2010

• 21:4821:48, 11 July 2010 diff hist −30‎ Tetraphobia ‎ Has plenty of references. If you need more stick some {{cn}}s where you need them.

10 July 2010

• 14:1214:12, 10 July 2010 diff hist +652‎ Talk:WebOS ‎ →‎How open is the system?: new section

5 July 2010

• 02:0902:09, 5 July 2010 diff hist −81‎ Swype ‎ →‎Availability: myTouch slide was released some time ago, so updating language to reflect that

28 June 2010

• 02:1102:11, 28 June 2010 diff hist +14‎ Radium ‎ →‎History: Assume this is what the article means
• 01:4101:41, 28 June 2010 diff hist +1,364‎ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stanley Watras ‎ Comment
• 01:2501:25, 28 June 2010 diff hist +2,536‎ Talk:Stanley Watras ‎ →‎Delete it, keep it, or direct it to an article that actually mentions Stanley Watras: You expect others to fix what you break? How does that make sense?
• 01:0701:07, 28 June 2010 diff hist +1,251‎ User talk:Mr. Vernon ‎ →‎"Vandalism/Test": WHAT consensus? Even if there was one, calling me a vandal is fucking out of line.
• 00:5900:59, 28 June 2010 diff hist +1,307‎ Talk:Stanley Watras ‎ →‎Nominated for deletion: Fix it.
• 00:5100:51, 28 June 2010 diff hist +573‎ User talk:66.149.58.8 ‎ →‎June 2010: Response to "vandalism" smear
• 00:4800:48, 28 June 2010 diff hist +642‎ User talk:Mr. Vernon ‎ →‎"Vandalism/Test": new section

27 June 2010

• 15:3815:38, 27 June 2010 diff hist +1,318‎ Stanley Watras ‎ There is nothing about Stanley Watras at the redirect. RVing to last good version (don't mind article being merged, but merge it first, otherwise the reader is left in an irrelevent article)

15 June 2010

• 02:5402:54, 15 June 2010 diff hist −62‎ Charles Joughin ‎ Undid revision 365860784 by 168.169.116.6 (talk) Corrupted article subhead, undoing.

12 June 2010

• 18:0718:07, 12 June 2010 diff hist +22‎ Engine efficiency ‎ →‎Steam: Stirling engines rarely (ever?) use steam
• 13:3713:37, 12 June 2010 diff hist +6‎ Engine efficiency ‎ →‎Steam: Steam turbines and gas turbines are not quite the same thing... Also GM is not Detroit.
• 13:3413:34, 12 June 2010 diff hist −5‎ Engine efficiency ‎ →‎Steam: While phased out in most of the developed world's mainlines, they're still in use elsewhere.
• 13:2213:22, 12 June 2010 diff hist −205‎ Multiple unit ‎ →‎Advantages: This is true of virtually all passenger trains since the invention of vacuum brakes, MU or locomotive hauled.
• 13:1613:16, 12 June 2010 diff hist −387‎ Multiple unit ‎ →‎Disadvantages: Reduce redundant "disadvantages". Also make clear that the lack of gangways thing is "frequent" rather than the rule. Many MUs do have gangways.

28 May 2010

• 11:3111:31, 28 May 2010 diff hist +239‎ Talk:The Observer ‎ →‎Mid week one off?: +cite
• 11:2911:29, 28 May 2010 diff hist +109‎ Talk:The Observer ‎ →‎Mid week one off?
• 11:2811:28, 28 May 2010 diff hist +42‎ Talk:The Observer ‎ →‎Mid week one off?: +c
• 11:2511:25, 28 May 2010 diff hist +370‎ Talk:The Observer ‎ →‎Mid week one off?: Yep.

20 May 2010

• 01:3801:38, 20 May 2010 diff hist −46‎ Beeching cuts ‎ →‎Final closures under Beeching: There are plenty of examples of profitable railways, including many in Britain, this wording is unfortunate if common.

12 May 2010

• 16:3216:32, 12 May 2010 diff hist −399‎ Beeching cuts ‎ Undid revision 359929054 by Pyrotec (talk) Agree with original removal (if could have been more diplomatic): Hitchens book is not notable. Tag: references removed

27 April 2010

• 22:2622:26, 27 April 2010 diff hist +136‎ Advanced Passenger Train ‎ →‎Demise: Article says he "agrees" with the hypothesis, so I guess we have a particular person plus the hint of more. Personally I'm not convinced this should be here, but here's a cite anyway.

14 April 2010

• 22:3522:35, 14 April 2010 diff hist +1‎ China Blue High-definition Disc ‎ →‎Technology: Needs the apostrophe as it's possessive (why is it correct with Blu-ray and not with HD DVD?)

3 April 2010

• 18:1318:13, 3 April 2010 diff hist +6‎ Gurupa ‎ No references, and I can't find anything on the net beyond one comment on Amazon answers (ie user contributed content) pointing back here.

7 March 2010

• 23:5023:50, 7 March 2010 diff hist −1,788‎ Beeching cuts ‎ Rationalize the introduction to cover the basics: three paragraphs, including a debate on the Beeching report's contents, and a reference to an arbitrary book, is really not the way to go. Tag: references removed
• 18:0118:01, 7 March 2010 diff hist −11‎ Arthur Scargill ‎ More than just "his" and describing it as "disastrous" means the article is written from the POV of a particular side in the strike.
• 15:0915:09, 7 March 2010 diff hist +1,614‎ Talk:British Rail ‎ →‎Removed drive-by tag: new section