User contributions for 49.180.156.49

This IP address is currently partially blocked. The latest block log entry is provided below for reference:

14:07, 8 April 2024 Deepfriedokra talk contribs blocked 49.180.0.0/16 talk from the page User talk:Grandpallama with an expiration time of 1 month (anon. only) (trollish harassment. possible block evasion.)

View full log

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

06:2106:21, 18 January 2019 diff hist −5‎ Talk:Ricardo Vélez Rodríguez ‎ →‎Political ideology
06:2006:20, 18 January 2019 diff hist +655‎ Talk:Ricardo Vélez Rodríguez ‎ →‎Political ideology
05:3105:31, 18 January 2019 diff hist +4‎ Talk:Ricardo Vélez Rodríguez ‎ →‎RfC about BLP political political view
05:3005:30, 18 January 2019 diff hist −1‎ Talk:Ricardo Vélez Rodríguez ‎ →‎RfC about BLP political political view: fixed RfC template
05:3005:30, 18 January 2019 diff hist +7‎ User talk:Young Brujah ‎ →‎Ricardo Vélez Rodríguez: sp
05:2905:29, 18 January 2019 diff hist +584‎ User talk:Young Brujah ‎ →‎Ricardo Vélez Rodríguez: new section
05:2405:24, 18 January 2019 diff hist +403‎ Talk:Ricardo Vélez Rodríguez ‎ →‎Political ideology
05:1005:10, 18 January 2019 diff hist +838‎ Wikipedia:Requests for page protection ‎ →‎Ricardo Vélez Rodríguez
05:0405:04, 18 January 2019 diff hist +6,461‎ Ricardo Vélez Rodríguez ‎ see talk page -- now the burden is on you -- WP:PROVEIT
05:0205:02, 18 January 2019 diff hist +8,214‎ Talk:Ricardo Vélez Rodríguez ‎No edit summary
04:1004:10, 18 January 2019 diff hist +6,461‎ Ricardo Vélez Rodríguez ‎ Now you've gone as far as removing reliable sources that corroborate your belief? Like I said, seek consensus if you really insist on this
03:5503:55, 18 January 2019 diff hist +2,812‎ Ricardo Vélez Rodríguez ‎ How can I assume good faith from a Marxist/Antifa militant editing in an anti-Marxism BLP? Stop cherry-picking partisan sources to back up your belief and stop using WP:WEASEL words such as "widely" when only one biased source was given ---- Added multiple reliable sources that back up his views simply as liberal/right-wing/conservative. Leave your political bias out of this page or I'll report your disruptive behavior.
01:2601:26, 18 January 2019 diff hist −263‎ Ricardo Vélez Rodríguez ‎ Seek consensus before adding a contentious accusation and changing the status quo of a stable article — given source is partisan and has only a piece of an opinion of the writer

18 January 2019