User contributions for 2A02:8428:809E:6701:E4ED:5B5E:1EEB:E8EB

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

05:1905:19, 6 January 2024 diff hist +410‎ Talk:Rostam ‎ →‎Zabulistan clarification: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic
04:0404:04, 6 January 2024 diff hist +102‎ Kambojas ‎ Added relevant pages to make the subject broader. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

23:1623:16, 5 January 2024 diff hist +59‎ Kabulistan ‎ Added supra regions or older regions to make the subject broader Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
23:1523:15, 5 January 2024 diff hist +45‎ Kabulistan ‎ Made it more clear to understand the view of Kabul during Babur's reign in the 16th century. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
23:1123:11, 5 January 2024 diff hist +1,067‎ Kabulistan ‎ Added more accuracy to this pretty void pages, it'll be a good idea to quote Afghan historian Ghulam Muhammad Ghobar to have more accuracy on the geography and history of Kabul and Kabulistan. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
21:3721:37, 5 January 2024 diff hist +872‎ Talk:Persians ‎ →‎Why naming Persian speaking scholars from Central Asia/Khorasan/Afghanistan Persians in Wikipedia ?: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic

19:0019:00, 4 January 2024 diff hist +21‎ Talk:Afghanistan ‎ →‎Why is Afghanistan at the border of Central Asia and South Asia but not the Middle East/West Asia also ?: Just added words to make it more accurate. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
18:5718:57, 4 January 2024 diff hist +1,045‎ Talk:Afghanistan ‎ →‎Why is Afghanistan at the border of Central Asia and South Asia but not the Middle East/West Asia also ?: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
18:3818:38, 4 January 2024 diff hist −499‎ Ghazni ‎ Quoting André Wink about Afghanistan is liké quoting Marcel Granet about Mongolia. His claims contradictory. Claiming Ghazni to be part of the Indian subcontinent until the 9th century makes no sense to begin with because the idea of an Indian subcontinent dates only from a couples of decades. Wink's own claimed Arab sources say that today's Ghazni is part of the Khorasan marches, Indian sources themselves considered greater Ghazni and greater Kabul to be barbarians i.e not Indian. Tags: references removed Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

02:1502:15, 3 January 2024 diff hist −539‎ Kabulistan ‎ Never was the region considered part of the Indian subcontinent since the Indian subcontinent is a recent concept which stops on its western side in Pakistan. Secondly the region historically was never considered part of Al Hind too whether during Abbasid or later periods. It was considered something between Al Khorasan and Al Hind, or even sometimes an extension of Khorasan (cf Khorasan Marches). It's well knows its inhabitants were Iranics (Kambojans/Kapisean people and other various tribes). Tags: Reverted references removed Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit