User contributions for 2601:246:C700:F5:F45D:4CF5:F892:E985

28 February 2023

• 22:4322:43, 28 February 2023 diff hist +1,059‎ User talk:White whirlwind ‎ →‎ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
• 22:0422:04, 28 February 2023 diff hist −154‎ Elizabeth Prelogar ‎ →‎References: Removed the {{citation style...}} tag. This is the least of the article's issues. Every citation checked thus far has been over/misused (placed to appear to cover content not reallt presented in the citation, etc.) Article needs a thorough review for its compliance with WP:VERIFY.
• 22:0122:01, 28 February 2023 diff hist +809‎ Elizabeth Prelogar ‎ →‎Early life and education: Harvard citation misused—only barely supports last sentence preceding. Completed ABA Perspectives citation—did NOT say born and raised...; to say this, must find a citation. Until, sentence edited to reflect current source. NOTE, contrary to bot-placed prose, NO MATERIAL BEING ADDED WITHOUT CITATIONS. I don't know how bot works, but it's misidentifying constructive edits as otherwise. (We are only completing citations, and identifying ALREADY unsourced statements.) Tag: possible unreferenced addition to BLP
• 21:3721:37, 28 February 2023 diff hist +243‎ Elizabeth Prelogar ‎ →‎Early life and education: Completed the Siskind book source. Could ID page but could not verify content of page for lack of electronic record. Tag: possible unreferenced addition to BLP
• 21:2621:26, 28 February 2023 diff hist +325‎ Elizabeth Prelogar ‎ →‎Personal life: Found that the end of entence citation of the opening sentence of the personal life sentence supported only one of three facts presented as a series, so added {{fact...}} tags to the other two purported facts. In search of citations for the two for which the citation was misused, found a Congressional Record citation, but still only in support of the third fact.
• 21:0621:06, 28 February 2023 diff hist +638‎ Elizabeth Prelogar ‎ Completed the Senate questionnaire PDF citation. First six citations are now complete and checked for content. Presented DOB in the main body of article, so lead summarizes that, and moved the citation for that fact into the main body. NOTE, despite any bot statement to the contrary (see last edit summary), there has been no addition of unsourced material. Only thing being done is checking sources, leading to IDENTIFICATION of PRIOR unsourced material. That is all. Sources being sought.
• 20:3320:33, 28 February 2023 diff hist +225‎ Elizabeth Prelogar ‎ Completed the Bloomberg Law citation (added author and publ. and access dates to this citation). In doing so, noted that the source makes no mention of the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998. Per WP:VERIFY, wikilinks cannot serve to replace citations, and so the sentence with this citation was rewritten, and the unsupported material was marked with a {{fact...}} tag. Tag: possible unreferenced addition to BLP
• 20:1120:11, 28 February 2023 diff hist +154‎ Elizabeth Prelogar ‎ →‎References: Adding a {{citation style...}} template here, as unobtrusively as possible, because in ways other than already noted (and more than I can attend to in this short session), the citations are incomplete, and styles vary. Needs a once-over by a skilled WP source copyeditor.
• 20:0520:05, 28 February 2023 diff hist +49‎ Elizabeth Prelogar ‎ Converted a citation to WashPo to {{cite newspaper...}} so that the citation does not present in the citation list as a bare URL, and so that the usual link functions of the template will operate.
• 19:5419:54, 28 February 2023 diff hist +326‎ Elizabeth Prelogar ‎ Added a specific {{cite AV...}} source for the voice sample, so that one interested in knowing from where it was drawn saves clicks in seeing the source. In this case, the source is clearly valid.
• 19:3919:39, 28 February 2023 diff hist +42‎ Elizabeth Prelogar ‎ Copy edit / clarification of text of in-text note.
• 19:3519:35, 28 February 2023 diff hist +589‎ Elizabeth Prelogar ‎ Removing from view material regarding personal life which is unsupported by the sources presented, making the statements unverifiable. Text can be returned if good, valid, quality, verifiable sources can be found for this important BLP. The individual and the readers of this article deserve verifiable material, per WP:VERIFY.