User contributions for 2600:1700:B7A1:9A30:0:0:0:724

For 2600:1700:B7A1:9A30:0:0:0:724 talk block log logs filter log
Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

8 January 2021

7 January 2021

  • 22:2522:25, 7 January 2021 diff hist −20 Blinding LightsDummy edit: in case it wasn't obvioius, stuff like "was released alongside the deluxe edition of its parent album" is what I'm talking about. What's the point of all that incoherent, patrician junk when "included on the deluxe edition of 'After Hours'" says the same thing?
  • 22:2122:21, 7 January 2021 diff hist −260 Blinding LightsThis wild verbosity, which majorly drags down the writing's coherence and quality, is a problem in just about every single sentence of this article. Also, writing about the remixes here is tricky because the featured performers can't quite be credited the same. The word "by" works for Chromatics and Major Lazer but not Rosalía since she didn't remix her version. I wonder if the lede would be better if it didn't mention these artists or just had nothing about the remixes at all
  • 08:0408:04, 7 January 2021 diff hist −2 Conor Lamb→‎Tenure: no spaces after and before the equal sign section markup please; doing this adds weird indents

24 December 2020

7 December 2020

2 December 2020

21 November 2020

20 November 2020

21 April 2020

20 April 2020

18 April 2020

17 April 2020

16 April 2020

14 April 2020

13 April 2020

  • 02:1402:14, 13 April 2020 diff hist −533 Robert F. Chew→‎Filmography: this is unsourced, most of it is original research, and some of it is just bewildering. If he played the "titular character" in a movie called "Jamesy Boy," then he played Jamesy Boy but that article says he played a character IMDb says is "Strip Club Manager" and which our article says is, uh, "Fat Ass Manager" Tag: section blanking
  • 02:0202:02, 13 April 2020 diff hist +30,094 Stanfield OrganizationThis was an AFD candidate but extremist deletionists prodded instead. They knew articles like this are under heavy inclusionist protection because, among other things, they always have dozens and dozens of inbound links. This one has 147. 147! Did User:TTN or User:Atlantic306 click "What links here" in preparation of the post-deletion repairs they were going to do? They absolutely did not. If deletionists had to clean up after themselves, everyone would instantly become an inclusionist Tag: Removed redirect

11 April 2020

8 April 2020

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)