User contributions for 24.8.102.238

21 February 2009

• 19:5419:54, 21 February 2009 diff hist +629‎ Talk:Main Page ‎No edit summary

10 January 2009

• 04:4904:49, 10 January 2009 diff hist −520‎ Christmas controversies ‎ →‎History: No refererce, and I'm sure most kids know Christmas is Jesus' birthday and that Easter is about his resurrection.

14 November 2008

• 21:5521:55, 14 November 2008 diff hist −859‎ Ontological argument ‎ →‎Kant: existence is not a predicate: But that's an argument based on evidence, not an a priori argument and thus not an ontological argument.

14 October 2008

• 18:2818:28, 14 October 2008 diff hist +502‎ User talk:Matthew83 ‎ →‎UAA
• 18:2418:24, 14 October 2008 diff hist +290‎ User talk:Matthew83 ‎ →‎UAA
• 05:5705:57, 14 October 2008 diff hist −1,551‎ Ontological argument ‎ Then sooner or latter you can include it when you get a cite. Please see Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:No original research.
• 05:5105:51, 14 October 2008 diff hist +769‎ User talk:Matthew83 ‎No edit summary

11 October 2008

• 20:0620:06, 11 October 2008 diff hist +1,402‎ User talk:Matthew83 ‎No edit summary
• 19:5019:50, 11 October 2008 diff hist −1,542‎ Ontological argument ‎ Again man, UNCITED. Infidels isn't some scholarly source, and even there there's nothing about any UAA.

7 October 2008

• 05:5405:54, 7 October 2008 diff hist −86‎ Ontological argument ‎ Undid revision 243449891 by WylieC (talk)Some dude's blog is in general not a good source.

4 October 2008

• 05:5305:53, 4 October 2008 diff hist +2,417‎ Talk:Ontological argument ‎No edit summary
• 04:5804:58, 4 October 2008 diff hist −39,002‎ Talk:Ontological argument ‎ saving a page archive
• 04:5804:58, 4 October 2008 diff hist +39,071‎ N Talk:Ontological argument/Archive 3 ‎ ←Created page with '{{talkarchive}} ==Plantinga argument== I'm not a philosophy type of a guy, but can't this argument be turned on its head and made to disprove the existence of God ...'
• 04:4704:47, 4 October 2008 diff hist −1,400‎ Ontological argument ‎ Again, UNCITED, and of course the argument exists, however it would have to exist outside of a mind to be of the same form, and no argument is outside of a mind, as it's an idea.

26 September 2008

• 05:3605:36, 26 September 2008 diff hist −1,416‎ Ontological argument ‎ This is uncited, and premise 2 is clearly faulty. ALL ARGUMENTS exists in your imagination(mind) and nowhere else.

6 September 2008

• 21:0221:02, 6 September 2008 diff hist −4‎ Iliad ‎No edit summary
• 20:4720:47, 6 September 2008 diff hist +8‎ Roman conquest of Britain ‎No edit summary