User contributions for 24.68.230.247

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

23:5223:52, 13 January 2010 diff hist −868‎ C Sharp (programming language) ‎ Undid revision 337692408 by Cybercobra: including Java in the list, even with a note, is a statement in our own words giving weight, and it's not our place to analyze this subject. added talk. Tag: references removed
23:5023:50, 13 January 2010 diff hist +2,956‎ Talk:C Sharp (programming language) ‎ new section: influenced by Java claim (rehashed)
20:5620:56, 13 January 2010 diff hist −868‎ C Sharp (programming language) ‎ Undid revision 337579824 by Cybercobra: the problem is solid refs exist for "not Java" too, thus an admin said rather than stating either side as the de facto truth, give explicit quotes. see talk. Tag: references removed
00:2300:23, 13 January 2010 diff hist −854‎ C Sharp (programming language) ‎ Undid revision 337496688 by Hervegirod: it has also been denied many times by authorities. consensus was reached that this is a matter of dispute and wikipedia should not take a side. Tag: references removed

04:0004:00, 12 January 2010 diff hist −9‎ C Sharp (programming language) ‎ →‎History: fixing gosling's quote for the context: "it"->C# "that language"->Java
03:5803:58, 12 January 2010 diff hist +1‎ C Sharp (programming language) ‎ gosling's claim also doesn't belong in the intro, moving to the history section
03:5503:55, 12 January 2010 diff hist −38‎ C Sharp (programming language) ‎ the java derivation claim was previously discussed and two administrators weighed in against repeating gosling's controversial claims as if they were a fact

08:2308:23, 18 December 2009 diff hist +8‎ Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol ‎ →‎PPTP specification: "firewalls are unable to let pass this traffic flawlessly, resulting in an inability to connect" sounds like horse shit