User contributions for 24.18.246.136

9 April 2016

• 09:1209:12, 9 April 2016 diff hist 0‎ RealClearPolitics ‎ updated Alexa access date
• 09:1109:11, 9 April 2016 diff hist −21‎ RealClearPolitics ‎ fixed formatting error
• 09:1009:10, 9 April 2016 diff hist 0‎ RealClearPolitics ‎ Updated Alexa rank http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/realclearpolitics.com

20 March 2016

• 07:0107:01, 20 March 2016 diff hist +80‎ Mark Geiger ‎ →‎Controversy: made it far more neutral than the original
• 07:0007:00, 20 March 2016 diff hist +182‎ Mark Geiger ‎ Undid revision 710979014 by Cedric tsan cantonais (talk)

27 July 2015

• 07:5007:50, 27 July 2015 diff hist +42‎ Josephine Witt ‎ This is not a notable person. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

20 May 2015

• 06:1506:15, 20 May 2015 diff hist +309‎ RealClearPolitics ‎No edit summary
• 06:1406:14, 20 May 2015 diff hist −565‎ RealClearPolitics ‎ →‎Ownership: Information is now obsolete. Forbes no longer owns RealClearPolitics.
• 06:1206:12, 20 May 2015 diff hist +2‎ RealClearPolitics ‎ put the information about Forbes and Crest Media in the "Origin" section; it seems more appropriate here
• 06:0906:09, 20 May 2015 diff hist −1‎ RealClearPolitics ‎ fixed date
• 06:0706:07, 20 May 2015 diff hist +397‎ RealClearPolitics ‎ Forbes's stake has been bought out by RealClearInvestors and Crest Media

3 April 2015

• 10:5210:52, 3 April 2015 diff hist +61‎ The Conversation (website) ‎ →‎Criticism: Rephrased
• 10:3010:30, 3 April 2015 diff hist +526‎ The Conversation (website) ‎ Undid revision 654400137 by Chriswaterguy (talk)

31 March 2015

• 19:0219:02, 31 March 2015 diff hist +452‎ Talk:The Conversation (website) ‎ →‎Unsupported claim, "perceived as being an outlet for far left-wing politicians"
• 19:0019:00, 31 March 2015 diff hist +526‎ The Conversation (website) ‎ Undid revision 654331832 by Chriswaterguy (talk) The text is supported by the article cited.
• 18:5918:59, 31 March 2015 diff hist −111‎ Talk:The Conversation (website) ‎ Undid revision 654332241 by Chriswaterguy (talk) The text is supported by the source.
• 04:3704:37, 31 March 2015 diff hist +84‎ Talk:The Conversation (website) ‎ →‎Unsupported claim, "perceived as being an outlet for far left-wing politicians"
• 04:3504:35, 31 March 2015 diff hist +76‎ Talk:The Conversation (website) ‎ →‎Unsupported claim, "perceived as being an outlet for far left-wing politicians"
• 04:3304:33, 31 March 2015 diff hist +526‎ The Conversation (website) ‎ Commenter removes valid criticism simply because he disagrees with it.

22 March 2015

• 08:0308:03, 22 March 2015 diff hist −394‎ RealClearPolitics ‎ Completely irrelevant what the partisan left-wing website thinks. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit

19 March 2015

• 04:0704:07, 19 March 2015 diff hist −2‎ Andrew Jaspan ‎ →‎Controversy
• 04:0704:07, 19 March 2015 diff hist +565‎ Andrew Jaspan ‎ →‎Controversy: The Conversation is an outlet for left-wing economists
• 04:0204:02, 19 March 2015 diff hist +526‎ The Conversation (website) ‎ Undid revision 648865172 by Chriswaterguy (talk) Revision unwarranted. No evidence provided for removal of previous content.

5 February 2015

• 20:1720:17, 5 February 2015 diff hist +3‎ The Conversation (website) ‎ →‎Criticism: housekeeping
• 20:1720:17, 5 February 2015 diff hist +565‎ The Conversation (website) ‎ →‎Criticism: The Commentator has identified the The Conversation as an outlet which has published pro-Syriza commentary.

20 November 2014

• 07:0607:06, 20 November 2014 diff hist +429‎ Kshama Sawant ‎ sawant arrest

12 August 2014

• 06:1706:17, 12 August 2014 diff hist −78‎ RealClearPolitics ‎No edit summary