User contributions for 209.93.141.17

26 November 2017

• 17:3917:39, 26 November 2017 diff hist +9‎ Zack Knight ‎ →‎Career
• 17:3717:37, 26 November 2017 diff hist +30‎ Zack Knight ‎ →‎Career
• 17:3617:36, 26 November 2017 diff hist −6‎ Zack Knight ‎ →‎Singles
• 17:3517:35, 26 November 2017 diff hist +8‎ Zack Knight ‎ →‎Singles

26 September 2017

• 00:3300:33, 26 September 2017 diff hist +203‎ Talk:38628 Huya ‎ →‎Problems with Russian pronunciation
• 00:3100:31, 26 September 2017 diff hist +120‎ Talk:38628 Huya ‎ →‎size discrepancy...
• 00:2300:23, 26 September 2017 diff hist +167‎ Talk:38628 Huya ‎ →‎size discrepancy...
• 00:2100:21, 26 September 2017 diff hist +430‎ Talk:38628 Huya ‎ →‎size discrepancy...: new section

25 September 2017

• 06:2906:29, 25 September 2017 diff hist +481‎ Talk:List of possible dwarf planets ‎ →‎Brightness table
• 06:2706:27, 25 September 2017 diff hist +644‎ Talk:List of possible dwarf planets ‎ →‎reorder by measured diameter?
• 06:2306:23, 25 September 2017 diff hist +114‎ Talk:List of possible dwarf planets ‎ →‎Lower limit?
• 06:2206:22, 25 September 2017 diff hist +2,134‎ Talk:List of possible dwarf planets ‎ →‎Lower limit?
• 06:0806:08, 25 September 2017 diff hist +1,164‎ Talk:List of possible dwarf planets ‎ →‎Table Update
• 05:4105:41, 25 September 2017 diff hist +17‎ 2060 Chiron ‎ There's obviously a ton of work gone into this, so why did you dump all those sizes under "dimensions" without any indication of whether they were diameter or radius, and occasionally pick a suboptimal figure from the linked sources? Anyway, FTFY...
• 04:5504:55, 25 September 2017 diff hist −8‎ Makemake ‎ →‎Satellite: getting tired of radius vs diameter nonsense. "Dimensions" are w*h*d type measurements; putting a single figure there confuses matters. Main text has "175km diameter", sizes in sidebars tend to be radii... also where did "250km" come from?
• 03:4503:45, 25 September 2017 diff hist +40‎ (66063) 1998 RO1 ‎ and why not throw in some kerning-neatening thin nbsp's just to be a fancy-pants too :)
• 03:4203:42, 25 September 2017 diff hist −1‎ (66063) 1998 RO1 ‎ having said that ... in for a penny, in for a pound. and in fact, the previous edit summary just made me realise I may as well switch two characters and have everything expressed in standard kg-m-s units.
• 03:4003:40, 25 September 2017 diff hist +24‎ (66063) 1998 RO1 ‎ I feel kinda bad doing this one, as I can see why you wrote it that way, but still - gravity is in m/s^2, not mm/s^2, even if really small. That's what the already once-abused standard form is for. (But weirdly g/cm^3 IS standard and 1 directly = 1kg/m^3)
• 03:3603:36, 25 September 2017 diff hist −15‎ (66063) 1998 RO1 ‎ notwithstanding that the correct form for tonnes would be "t" or just "tonne(s)", with "mt" suggesting either an erroneously uncapitalised megatonne or a weird millitonne (ie, 1kg), the standard mass unit used for all these infoboxes is the kilogramme.
• 03:0103:01, 25 September 2017 diff hist −1‎ Talk:3753 Cruithne ‎ →‎Orbiting Lagrangian point L4? Oh no, it's not!
• 03:0003:00, 25 September 2017 diff hist +495‎ Talk:3753 Cruithne ‎ →‎Orbiting Lagrangian point L4? Oh no, it's not!
• 02:5402:54, 25 September 2017 diff hist +225‎ Talk:3753 Cruithne ‎ →‎Quasi-satellite or not?
• 02:5302:53, 25 September 2017 diff hist +1,881‎ Talk:3753 Cruithne ‎ →‎Orbiting Lagrangian point L4? Oh no, it's not!
• 02:4002:40, 25 September 2017 diff hist +1,162‎ Talk:(419624) 2010 SO16 ‎ →‎Quasi-satellite
• 02:1102:11, 25 September 2017 diff hist −11‎ Moons of Haumea ‎ →‎Orbital characteristics: ok, bad enough that the mass scaling for major planets' moons jumps between 10^15, 10^16 and 10^18kg somewhat arbitrarily, making comparisons hard, but choosing 10^21 is completely absurd and misses the point of Standard Form
• 02:0602:06, 25 September 2017 diff hist +1,377‎ Talk:Hydra (moon) ‎ →‎Another pretty much meaningless mass figure: new section
• 01:5201:52, 25 September 2017 diff hist +5‎ Talk:Nix (moon) ‎ →‎Date format
• 01:5201:52, 25 September 2017 diff hist +3,059‎ Talk:Nix (moon) ‎ →‎Date format
• 01:3101:31, 25 September 2017 diff hist +682‎ Talk:Nix (moon) ‎ →‎mass
• 01:0401:04, 25 September 2017 diff hist −12‎ Triton (moon) ‎ actually looks like that part was altered from cromulent english into that babble, so I've fixed it back to how it was, and the later also-fiddled part to a hybrid which is both valid but clear ("relatively young" is AOK, but "sparse" is a bit techie)
• 01:0001:00, 25 September 2017 diff hist −2‎ Triton (moon) ‎ we am spekeing the english well good isnt us
• 00:2400:24, 25 September 2017 diff hist +275‎ Talk:Galatea (moon) ‎ →‎Geological activity
• 00:1500:15, 25 September 2017 diff hist +962‎ Talk:Naiad (moon) ‎ →‎Gone missing

24 September 2017

• 23:4223:42, 24 September 2017 diff hist +71‎ Talk:Mab (moon) ‎No edit summary
• 23:3923:39, 24 September 2017 diff hist +375‎ Talk:Mab (moon) ‎No edit summary
• 23:3623:36, 24 September 2017 diff hist +460‎ Talk:Mab (moon) ‎ →‎Radius vs Diameter... AGAIN
• 23:3123:31, 24 September 2017 diff hist +254‎ Talk:Mab (moon) ‎ →‎Radius vs Diameter... AGAIN
• 23:2923:29, 24 September 2017 diff hist +880‎ Talk:Mab (moon) ‎ →‎Radius vs Diameter... AGAIN: new section
• 23:1523:15, 24 September 2017 diff hist +256‎ Talk:Perdita (moon) ‎ →‎Name
• 23:1323:13, 24 September 2017 diff hist +320‎ Talk:Perdita (moon) ‎ →‎Name
• 23:1123:11, 24 September 2017 diff hist +632‎ Talk:Perdita (moon) ‎ →‎size weirdness: new section
• 19:5019:50, 24 September 2017 diff hist +1,790‎ Talk:Hecatoncheires ‎ →‎In Popular Culture
• 19:1719:17, 24 September 2017 diff hist +3‎ Moons of Saturn ‎ →‎Confirmed moons: period, and eccentricity updated too; Expect the details for several other small moons may need researching and correcting as well, but only did this as I noticed it whilst passing through... maybe if everyone does one each?
• 19:1419:14, 24 September 2017 diff hist −6‎ Moons of Saturn ‎ →‎Confirmed moons: the data shown here was both in conflict with what was on Anthe's own page and with that documented elsewhere; just found I didn't copy down the orbital period so will edit that as well in a minute or so
• 19:0919:09, 24 September 2017 diff hist +274‎ Talk:Anthe (moon) ‎ →‎actual size?
• 19:0819:08, 24 September 2017 diff hist +1‎ Anthe (moon) ‎ found the correct form for at least some of the tags, let's see if they work.
• 18:2718:27, 24 September 2017 diff hist +556‎ Talk:42355 Typhon ‎ →‎minor planet with a large moon, or a binary minor planet?
• 18:2318:23, 24 September 2017 diff hist +586‎ Talk:42355 Typhon ‎ →‎minor planet with a large moon, or a binary minor planet?: new section
• 18:1818:18, 24 September 2017 diff hist +1‎ Talk:65489 Ceto ‎ →‎Name, "known satellites"...
• 18:1718:17, 24 September 2017 diff hist +102‎ Talk:65489 Ceto ‎ →‎Name, "known satellites"...