User contributions for 198.111.162.10

15 May 2024

• 23:1523:15, 15 May 2024 diff hist +457‎ Silverplate ‎ Added clarification to the use of the B-29 for the atomic bomb. It was not just a preference for using an American plane, but the superior range, speed, and high altitude performance were primary factors for its choice

16 February 2024

• 00:0800:08, 16 February 2024 diff hist +663‎ Avro Lancaster ‎ Updated content. The previous version failed to include the entire content of the passage it refenced, which gave a misleading impression as to why the Lancaster was not chosen.

8 February 2024

• 00:5200:52, 8 February 2024 diff hist +1,471‎ Talk:Avro Lancaster ‎ →‎Assessment - use of the Lancaster for the atomic bomb: new section Tag: New topic
• 00:3600:36, 8 February 2024 diff hist +281‎ Avro Lancaster ‎No edit summary Tag: Reverted
• 00:2300:23, 8 February 2024 diff hist +239‎ Avro Lancaster ‎ revised. The prevous verison of the article fasley implied the only reason the B-29 was used was because the Americans preferred to use an American plane. The B-29 was both much ffaster than the Lancaster and had a longer range, both important chararcterics for dropping the atomic bomb. Although using the Lancaster was suggested,, using it was never considered by the America and the suggestion was quicklly rejected Tag: Reverted

19 October 2023

• 20:1020:10, 19 October 2023 diff hist +40‎ CISA ‎ →‎Organizations Tags: Reverted Visual edit

8 May 2023

• 22:5922:59, 8 May 2023 diff hist 0‎ Notitia Galliarum ‎No edit summary

29 April 2022

• 15:1115:11, 29 April 2022 diff hist −1‎ Formula BMW ‎No edit summary
• 15:1015:10, 29 April 2022 diff hist +13‎ Formula BMW ‎No edit summary
• 15:0815:08, 29 April 2022 diff hist −2‎ Formula BMW ‎No edit summary
• 15:0715:07, 29 April 2022 diff hist +20‎ Formula BMW ‎No edit summary
• 15:0615:06, 29 April 2022 diff hist −13‎ Formula BMW ‎No edit summary

12 April 2022

• 20:1520:15, 12 April 2022 diff hist +2,654‎ Talk:History of the compass ‎ Update references to first appearance of the compass in Europe and Muslim world. Assigned separate dates to first appearance in Europe and Muslim world as per the evid3ence
• 19:3019:30, 12 April 2022 diff hist +1‎ History of the compass ‎No edit summary
• 19:2119:21, 12 April 2022 diff hist +37‎ History of the compass ‎No edit summary

25 June 2021

• 20:2220:22, 25 June 2021 diff hist +181‎ Coronary artery disease ‎ #1Lib1Ref Tags: nowiki added Visual edit

19 February 2020

• 21:2921:29, 19 February 2020 diff hist +2,591‎ User talk:198.111.162.10 ‎ →‎Updates to history section - should the discussion of history of spectacles be removed and just reference the Wikipedia article on Glasses?: new section current
• 20:1620:16, 19 February 2020 diff hist +544‎ Optometry ‎ add a couple of references to history section, moved and combined some lines to make the reading flow better, and address question raised on clarification.

12 January 2020

• 21:5221:52, 12 January 2020 diff hist −2‎ Michaela DePrince ‎ →‎Early life

4 September 2019

• 21:5021:50, 4 September 2019 diff hist +193‎ Shane Berkery ‎No edit summary Tag: Visual edit

16 August 2019

• 17:1917:19, 16 August 2019 diff hist −28‎ Southfield Public Library ‎ Edited number of public computers Tag: Visual edit

22 June 2019

• 19:3219:32, 22 June 2019 diff hist −921‎ Voshon Lenard ‎ big dick and balls all up in her mouth

10 June 2019

• 14:0914:09, 10 June 2019 diff hist +311‎ Southfield Public Library ‎ →‎References Tag: Visual edit
• 14:0114:01, 10 June 2019 diff hist −2‎ Southfield Public Library ‎No edit summary
• 13:5913:59, 10 June 2019 diff hist +294‎ Southfield Public Library ‎ Hours of operation Tag: Visual edit

18 April 2019

• 21:2221:22, 18 April 2019 diff hist +83‎ Movable type ‎ Early European accounts do not discuss printing.
• 21:1521:15, 18 April 2019 diff hist +658‎ Talk:Movable type ‎No edit summary
• 21:0921:09, 18 April 2019 diff hist −177‎ Talk:Movable type ‎ undid previous revision. Current article is biased, providing arguments in favor of transmission but not counter arguments against. Tag: Undo

17 April 2019

• 21:2721:27, 17 April 2019 diff hist +1,071‎ Talk:Movable type ‎No edit summary
• 21:1421:14, 17 April 2019 diff hist +394‎ Movable type ‎ The European text refereed to do not actually mention printing or movable type, and statement of documents in archives gives misleading impression. Added statement to make clear that fact/.

15 April 2019

• 22:1922:19, 15 April 2019 diff hist +546‎ Talk:Chinese treasure ship ‎No edit summary
• 21:5721:57, 15 April 2019 diff hist +953‎ Chinese treasure ship ‎ Add comment on da Conti passage - a view of the context of passage does not necessarily suggest they are Chinese ships he is discussing.

14 April 2019

• 20:5420:54, 14 April 2019 diff hist +643‎ Talk:History of timekeeping devices ‎No edit summary
• 20:3920:39, 14 April 2019 diff hist +507‎ History of timekeeping devices ‎ added additional information on the history of hourglass

12 April 2019

• 20:4520:45, 12 April 2019 diff hist +1,328‎ Talk:History of printing in East Asia ‎ answering question as to conflict between Chinese inventing metal movable type in Song dynasty and Koreans being the first to use metal movable type printing.

11 April 2019

• 00:2100:21, 11 April 2019 diff hist +1,681‎ Talk:Movable type ‎No edit summary

10 April 2019

• 23:5723:57, 10 April 2019 diff hist +78‎ Movable type ‎ need reference to support claim it is faster to carve a block of text than to compose a page of text. And implied claim that type setting was relatively quicker than woodblock printing is not justified by reference. .
• 23:4523:45, 10 April 2019 diff hist +1,398‎ Talk:History of printing in East Asia ‎No edit summary
• 23:0023:00, 10 April 2019 diff hist +16‎ History of printing in East Asia ‎ revised reference, wrong page cited for comparison of movable and wood block printing. information was found on 211, and 221, not page 201 as originally cited
• 22:3522:35, 10 April 2019 diff hist +440‎ History of printing in East Asia ‎ need reference to show what kind of material wood type was more durable than. Also, page cited does not support claim of wood type being quicker, only that type (not just wood in particular) printing could be quick for large printings

9 April 2019

• 21:0521:05, 9 April 2019 diff hist +360‎ Talk:Movable type ‎No edit summary
• 21:0021:00, 9 April 2019 diff hist +370‎ Movable type ‎ Add drawbacks given on ceramic type from Science and Civilization in China volume 5-1
• 20:3820:38, 9 April 2019 diff hist +397‎ Movable type ‎ add comment on differences between Korean and Western printing methods.

7 April 2019

• 20:5020:50, 7 April 2019 diff hist −6‎ Movable type ‎ source cited does not state East Asia printing used a press, and other sources have specifically claimed East Asian did not use mechanical devices. Removed the word "press"
• 20:4820:48, 7 April 2019 diff hist +1,633‎ Talk:Movable type ‎No edit summary

30 March 2019

• 21:2621:26, 30 March 2019 diff hist +93‎ Talk:History of the compass ‎No edit summary
• 21:2421:24, 30 March 2019 diff hist +223‎ History of the compass ‎ add back stated about possible transmission of compass from China to Arab world
• 21:0021:00, 30 March 2019 diff hist +1,029‎ Talk:History of the compass ‎No edit summary
• 20:4220:42, 30 March 2019 diff hist +174‎ History of the compass ‎ removed some speculation - since Neckam's mention of compass is earlier than Franco-Mongol alliance, and Marco Polo, they are not a factor in transmission to Europe

29 March 2019

• 20:5720:57, 29 March 2019 diff hist +847‎ Talk:History of printing in East Asia ‎ explanation of additions on ceramic type