User contributions for 182.249.240.43
For 182.249.240.43 talk block log logs filter log
25 August 2014
- 12:2012:20, 25 August 2014 diff hist +714 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →User:Afterwriting
- 12:0112:01, 25 August 2014 diff hist −1 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →User:Afterwriting
- 11:5611:56, 25 August 2014 diff hist +483 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →User:Afterwriting
- 11:4711:47, 25 August 2014 diff hist 0 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →User:Afterwriting
- 11:4411:44, 25 August 2014 diff hist +681 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →User:Afterwriting
24 June 2014
- 09:1909:19, 24 June 2014 diff hist +603 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →User:Juzumaru continuing personal attacks and disruptive editing: Proposing WP:TBAN/WP:IBAN for Juzumaru]]
21 June 2014
- 02:1602:16, 21 June 2014 diff hist −146 Michael Auslin →External links: An advertisement for a popular documentary in which he was featured is not a useful resource.
- 02:0902:09, 21 June 2014 diff hist +15 Talk:Kenji Miyazawa →Third Opinion
- 02:0702:07, 21 June 2014 diff hist +832 Talk:Kenji Miyazawa →Third Opinion
22 February 2014
- 02:4202:42, 22 February 2014 diff hist +1,182 Talk:Yamanoue no Okura →"descended from Emperor Kosho" or "a member of the Awata clan"
8 February 2014
- 09:4509:45, 8 February 2014 diff hist +109 User:Hijiri88/Old sandbox →Phase 5: Avengers vs. X-Men
- 09:4109:41, 8 February 2014 diff hist +945 User:Hijiri88/Old sandbox →Phase 5: Avengers vs. X-Men
7 February 2014
- 12:1112:11, 7 February 2014 diff hist +971 Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Japan →提案
11 January 2014
- 16:4316:43, 11 January 2014 diff hist −21 Talk:Yamanoue no Okura →Origin theories as covered in encyclopedia and dictionary entries on Okura
27 December 2013
- 04:2204:22, 27 December 2013 diff hist +300 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →User:Juzumaru: Collapsing own TLDR comment.
4 December 2013
- 10:0610:06, 4 December 2013 diff hist −2 Second Epistle of Peter Don't misrepresent what the source says. The author of that reference is conservative, and he admits that scholars are in agreement that this work is a pseudepigraph.