Related changes
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
4 June 2024
- diffhist m 2012 phenomenon 21:58 −4 GSK talk contribs (Reverted 1 edit by Halohalo97 (talk) to last revision by 85.117.100.49) Tags: Twinkle Undo
- diffhist 2012 phenomenon 20:53 +4 Halohalo97 talk contribs Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard 18:29 +515 Jéské Couriano talk contribs (→Indian Army regiments—articles being edited by orders from army brass: Re) Tag: Reply
- diffhist User talk:Valjean 18:02 −895 Valjean talk contribs (→The Signpost: 16 May 2024: ditto)
- diffhist User talk:Valjean 18:01 −4,758 Valjean talk contribs (→Administrators' newsletter – May 2024: cleanup)
- diffhist User talk:Joe Roe 14:53 +403 Starship.paint talk contribs (→Typo)
- diffhist User talk:Joe Roe 14:42 +157 Joe Roe talk contribs (→Typo: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist User talk:Joe Roe 14:38 +411 Starship.paint talk contribs (→Typo: new section) Tag: New topic
- diffhist User talk:Valjean 14:05 +233 Valjean talk contribs (→Abi Carter article: new section) Tag: New topic
- diffhist Module:Portal/images/b 03:18 +58 Hike395 talk contribs (restore Boston)
3 June 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard 19:52 −90 Zzuuzz talk contribs (→Indian Army regiments—articles being edited by orders from army brass: -my double sig huh)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard 18:09 −508 Myrealnamm-alt talk contribs (Undid revision 1227099181 by Myrealnamm-alt (talk) Nevermind, already warned) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard 18:08 +508 Myrealnamm-alt talk contribs (→Draft:Kim Cormack: new section) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Archaeology 00:59 +1,106 Carleas talk contribs (→Longyou Caves: new section) Tag: New topic
2 June 2024
- diffhist User talk:Valjean 21:25 +53 Valjean talk contribs (→A strong consensus cannot prevent a RfC: It's usually best to move on, away from such topics.)
- diffhist User talk:Valjean 19:36 +147 Valjean talk contribs (→A strong consensus cannot prevent a RfC: Showing "respect" for a consensus means a lot around here. It shows one AGF and is collegial.)
- diffhist User talk:Valjean 19:33 +832 Valjean talk contribs (→A strong consensus cannot prevent a RfC: Just don't say that I didn't warn you.)
- diffhist User talk:Valjean 19:14 +372 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→A strong consensus cannot prevent a RfC: new section) Tag: New topic
- diffhist Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard 18:40 +599 Zzuuzz talk contribs (→Indian Army regiments—articles being edited by orders from army brass: cmt)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard 17:52 +238 C.Fred talk contribs (→Indian Army regiments—articles being edited by orders from army brass: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard 17:45 +295 Procyon117 talk contribs (→Indian Army regiments—articles being edited by orders from army brass: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard 17:12 +32 C.Fred talk contribs (→Indian Army Regiments—articles being edited by orders from army brass: didnt' complete the section title)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard 17:12 +1,363 C.Fred talk contribs (→Indian Army Regiments—articles being: new section)
- diffhist Module:Section link 14:36 +512 Trappist the monk talk contribs (sync from sandbox;)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 04:57 +2 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: dummy edit and apologies. What I’ve said is probably incorrect and it seems that a previous substantial edit is also a direct quote from Jimbo Wales (and not in the editor’s own words as I said). Thanks.)
- diffhist m Wikipedia:Content assessment 02:39 +2 WhyIsNameSoHardOmg- - talk contribs Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
1 June 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 16:29 +16 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: better?)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 16:09 −16 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (Self-revert. I didn’t notice there’s a discussion on talk until someone pinged me just now (this page wasn’t on my watchlist). I want to say that the green emphasis was added because in another discussion a user has misinterpreted the policy by citing what Jimbo said. It’s a long story but I don’t think I’m able to explain it clearly. Anyway I don’t want anymore drama so I’m self-reverting. Thanks everyone for watching...) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 07:31 +16 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: Color. Wikipedia:Nobody reads the directions) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 07:24 −354 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (It seems to me that substantial change was made to the policy by another editor using their own words. I’m not sure it’s what Jimbo Wales’ original statement means. I’m restoring the page to the last stable version (revision 1224068956). Please read this too. Thanks.) Tag: Manual revert
31 May 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard 12:35 +404 331dot talk contribs (→Draft:Vishal Bawa: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 12:14 +78 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: This part of Jimmy Wales original statement is fundamental to make clear the link with the fundamental notion of NPOV. In contrast, "reliable sources" can even be used to mean the opposite of NPOV as when people use "reliable" to mean "has a non biased point of view" and this incorrect use of "reliable" happens very often.) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 12:00 −13 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: The "scientific" is misleading when we do not have the historical context, which was a scientific OR. The general principle is not about scientific knowledge only. This historical context was added as footnote, but this is not sufficient.) Tags: Manual revert Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 11:54 −22 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (The notion of reliable sources was not discussed at the time. It's an important point, but not the key point.) Tags: Manual revert Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Deletion policy 10:17 +6 SilverLocust talk contribs (→Deletion discussion: *venues) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- diffhist Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard 09:18 +265 ItsVishalBawa talk contribs (→Draft:Vishal Bawa: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard 08:22 +457 DoubleGrazing talk contribs (→Draft:Vishal Bawa: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 07:00 +2 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: better) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 06:59 +20 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: restore important clarification (revision 1226458510).) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 06:51 +13 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: add per Jimbo Wales 2003 statement.) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 06:49 +276 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: add context for Jimbo Wales 2003 statement.) Tag: Reverted
30 May 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 19:40 −20 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (Undid revision 1226458510 by WhatamIdoing (talk) This is a paraphrase of Jimmy Wales 2002 statement and the notion of reliable sources was not discussed at that time.) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 19:33 +20 WhatamIdoing talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: Not a minority of editors) Tags: Reverted 2017 wikitext editor
- diffhist Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard 05:54 +111 ForTupan talk contribs (→Maria-Ana Tupan: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard 05:54 +322 ForTupan talk contribs (→Maria-Ana Tupan: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard 05:51 +212 Theroadislong talk contribs (you should NOT be editing whilst logged out)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard 05:49 +242 ForTupan talk contribs (→Maria-Ana Tupan: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard 05:46 +395 ForTupan talk contribs (→Maria-Ana Tupan: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard 05:33 +679 ForTupan talk contribs (→Maria-Ana Tupan: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard 05:27 +376 CanonNi talk contribs (→Maria-Ana Tupan: Reply) Tag: Reply