Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Xaosflux (talk | contribs) at 00:06, 1 May 2017 (Wikipedia:Inactive administrators/2017#April 2017). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

    To contact bureaucrats to alert them of an urgent issue, please post below.
    For sensitive matters, you may contact an individual bureaucrat directly by e-mail.
    You may use this tool to locate recently active bureaucrats.

    The Bureaucrats' noticeboard is a place where items related to the Bureaucrats can be discussed and coordinated. Any user is welcome to leave a message or join the discussion here. Please start a new section for each topic.

    This is not a forum for grievances. It is a specific noticeboard addressing Bureaucrat-related issues. If you want to know more about an action by a particular bureaucrat, you should first raise the matter with them on their talk page. Please stay on topic, remain civil, and remember to assume good faith. Take extraneous comments or threads to relevant talk pages.

    If you are here to report that an RFA or an RFB is "overdue" or "expired", please wait at least 12 hours from the scheduled end time before making a post here about it. There are a fair number of active bureaucrats; and an eye is being kept on the time remaining on these discussions. Thank you for your patience.

    To request that your administrator status be removed, initiate a new section below.

    Crat tasks
    RfAs 1
    RfBs 0
    Overdue RfBs 0
    Overdue RfAs 0
    BRFAs 10
    Approved BRFAs 0
    Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
    RfA candidate S O N S % Status Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
    Elli 0 0 0 0 Discussion 16:53, 7 June 2024 5 days, 23 hours no report
    It is 17:07:10 on June 1, 2024, according to the server's time and date.


    Remove admin

    Hello, because of issues with my health, I've decided I want to put a little distance between myself and the trolls for right now. Hopefully, I'll be back in a few months, but now is a good time to take a break from the mop. Please remove my +sysop. If it isn't a problem, I would like to retain my current EFM and add templateeditor and rollback. Thank you. Dragons flight (talk) 02:34, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

     Done Thank you for your service, hope you find your break restful. — xaosflux Talk 03:40, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks. Dragons flight (talk) 05:20, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment. Damn! sorry to see that. Best wishes. Dlohcierekim 08:07, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    wikien-bureaucrats archives

    phab:T162068 is queued for deleting the old mailing list, wikien-bureaucrats. We were not clear about what to do with the old archives, without an active list any more I'm in favor of having them purged - some of the comments on the original discussion referenced privacy concerns. Does anyone have any need for these to be retained - if so for what period? — xaosflux Talk 21:53, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    I don't know of any reason to keep them. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 21:55, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm an archivist (and a bit of a hoarder) at heart and I've saved every significant e-mail that I received or sent since 2005, so the thought of flushing the entire wikien-crats archive almost pains me physically. Can't they be preserved as read-only? Can't they at least be saved on a page on stewardwiki?  · Salvidrim! ·  17:53, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Why stewardwiki? That would provide all stewards access to the archives, and it is always possible that the two enwiki bureaucrats could no longer be stewards or bureaucrats at some point in the future. --Rschen7754 18:01, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    The "default" behavior will be that they are still archived, however with the list gone adding / changing archive access would no longer be possible. — xaosflux Talk 19:01, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Resysop request (Doug Bell)

    Doug Bell (current rights · rights management · rights log (local) · rights log (global/meta) · block log)

    I'm not very active, but I'm still a good citizen. I'd appreciate having my admin rights restored. My account has never been compromised. —Doug Bell 17:28, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    (Non-bureaucrat comment) According to Special:Log/Doug Bell, you last used your sysop tools on April 4, 2007 (over 10 years ago). While there is no procedural reason to deny this request, do you really need the admin tools? --Rschen7754 17:34, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
     Bureaucrat note: Your first edit in 1.5 years was to return and ask for the admin rights. Is there an admin or crat that you know who could verify that you are indeed you? ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 22:37, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    The following inactive administrators are being desysoped due to inactivity. Thank you all for your service.

    1. ThaddeusB (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
    2. Yandman (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
    3. Bjarki S (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
    4. OldakQuill (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
    5. Shyam (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)

    xaosflux Talk 00:06, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]