User talk:Olivettilly: Difference between revisions
→June events with WIR: new section Tag: |
You have been blocked from editing for abusing multiple accounts. (TW) |
||
| Line 231: | Line 231: | ||
--[[User:Megalibrarygirl|Megalibrarygirl]] ([[User talk:Megalibrarygirl|talk]]) 17:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
--[[User:Megalibrarygirl|Megalibrarygirl]] ([[User talk:Megalibrarygirl|talk]]) 17:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
||
<!-- Message sent by User:Megalibrarygirl@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/O-Z&oldid=897767466 --> |
<!-- Message sent by User:Megalibrarygirl@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/O-Z&oldid=897767466 --> |
||
== June 2019 == |
|||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking_policy#Indefinite_blocks|indefinitely]]''' from editing for [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry|abusing multiple accounts]]. Note that multiple accounts are [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry#Legitimate uses|allowed]], but '''not for ''[[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry#Inappropriate uses of alternative accounts|illegitimate]]'' reasons''', and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G5|may be reverted or deleted]]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. [[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 13:37, 10 June 2019 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-sockblock --> |
|||
Revision as of 13:37, 10 June 2019
| This is Olivettilly's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments. |
|
This Month in GLAM: February 2019
| ||||||
Speedy deletion nomination of Domina Colette
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Domina Colette requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Daiyusha (talk) 21:24, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Women in Red
Hi there, Olivettilly, and welcome to Women in Red. I see you have been working on a few biographies. To avoid any problems, you might find it useful to look through our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 08:01, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Pete Ewing for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pete Ewing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pete Ewing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. signed, Rosguill talk 20:56, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Colette Pervette
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Colette Pervette, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Atlantic306 (talk) 13:24, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
The article Jade Love Kids Foundation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Promotion for non notable organisation. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. duffbeerforme (talk) 03:34, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Colette Pervette for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Colette Pervette is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colette Pervette until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. duffbeerforme (talk) 03:37, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
April editathons at Women in Red
April 2019
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:01, 25 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
(Please excuse this post if it is a duplicate!)
This Month in GLAM: March 2019
| ||||||
Speedy deletion nomination of Colette Pervette
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Colette Pervette, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at articles for deletion. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Atlantic306 (talk) 20:09, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- Hi. If you want the article content placed into draft, please can you make sure you have read the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest guidelines first. To be honest, if you just recreate the content as it stands, it will probably be deleted immediately again, so it would be better to start from scratch. Deb (talk) 07:14, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, please. I would like the article content placed into draft. Thank you. I will read the guideline and make another revision. I appreciate the feedback. Honestly, I had started from scratch. I spent a whole week reading the guidelines and whole other week rewriting it. I hope you had actually read it rather than delete it based on it's title. Excuse me, if I am wrong, but it does seem so because the article was completely rewritten. (Not to mention, the first iteration of the article had already been reviewed as Start-Class prior to being deleted, and it's on multiple lists of missing articles by the Women In Red WikiProject: UCLA, UC Berkeley, Authors.)
- Also, I must clarify that I am not in a 'conflict of interest'. I have never met this person and do not know them work for them or any sort of variable, I am not family friend or coworker, I have no situation that relates to a COI. We seemingly have gone to the same schools but at different times, and I have been to so many other schools as well. That would be silley that I am to not write about anyone from every college I have ever attended. I am also in different fields of study. I began this topic upon listening to a podcast and my intrest to participate in Wikipedia.Olivettilly (talk) 07:15, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
- Deb, just wondering if you were able to send the article to Draft space? Would I find it at Draft:Colette Pervette? I had originally moved it from my subpage User:Olivettilly/sandbox/sand3, would it be easier to move it back into there? Whatever is easiest, let me know. Thank you.
May you join this month's editathons from WiR!
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:17, 27 April 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June events with WIR
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June 2019
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 13:37, 10 June 2019 (UTC)