Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lascava: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
TonyBallioni (talk | contribs) →22 February 2019: cu results, close |
||
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
===22 February 2019=== |
===22 February 2019=== |
||
{{SPI case status| |
{{SPI case status|close}} |
||
====Suspected sockpuppets==== |
====Suspected sockpuppets==== |
||
| Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
||
*The following accounts are technically {{confirmed}} to one another and {{inconclusive}} to the batch above. I'm calling them proven behaviorally though. |
|||
**{{checkuser|Qespu}} |
|||
**{{checkuser|Seszo}} |
|||
**{{checkuser|Laccol}} |
|||
**{{checkuser|Takjamok}} |
|||
:All accounts are {{bwt}}. For future clerks/CUs: technically I doubt we're going to be able to confirm any future reports to this case, but CU is useful for sleepers. Closing. [[User:TonyBallioni|TonyBallioni]] ([[User talk:TonyBallioni|talk]]) 04:40, 23 February 2019 (UTC) |
|||
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
||
Revision as of 04:40, 23 February 2019
Lascava
Lascava (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lascava/Archive.
24 November 2018
– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.
Suspected sockpuppets
- AicsAics (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
two edits going against mine (see [1]) as in all other confirmed cases (see for example [2]) 
イヴァンスクルージ九十八（会話） 21:04, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Clerk endorsed - Please compare to previous socks and check for sleepers. Thanks, GABgab 22:22, 24 November 2018 (UTC)- Different device, but on the same range as all the other socks, and it's a DUCK so I'm going to go ahead and block behaviorally.
No sleepers immediately visible. Closing. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:23, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
26 November 2018
– A checkuser has completed a check on relevant users in this case, and it is now awaiting administration and close.
Suspected sockpuppets
- Frupenz (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tredesdelujsmspontecingolirodench (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Mosidan (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
This edit on IPA transription [3] is pretty identical to this [4] of Chraphee and to this other made by Mubessa [5]. Both Chraphee and Mubessa are confirmed socks of Lascava. The edit on Pompeo Marchesi is also commented (see edit comment) with an aggressive sentence. This edit [6] of Tredesdelujsmspontecingolirodench is identical to this other [7] made by Sosze. Again, Sosze is a confirmed sock of Lascava. A check seems appropiated. Horst Hof (talk) 10:50, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Tredesdelujsmspontecingolirodench (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) is
Likely to the following two accounts that are 
Confirmed to one another and technically 
Unrelated to the master:
- Oahphv (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Qlhxcber (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Mosidan (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) appears Unrelated technically to the named master and the above group.
- Frupenz (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)appears Unrelated to all of the above.
- Finally,
Behavioural evidence needs evaluation as to all the findings here. I've CU blocked the confirmed/likely group. A leave up to a clerk how/if to tag. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:20, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
22 February 2019
– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.
Suspected sockpuppets
- Seszo (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Obviously a sock of Sosze (confirmed sock of Lascava), same edits on the same pages. The username also suggests a close relation. Behavioural analysis would also suggest a relation to Ragaricus' case, same subject (italian IPA), same modalities, same hostinate determination to restore their preferred version without providing relevant sources. Horst Hof (talk) 10:04, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- The following accounts are technically Confirmed to one another and
Inconclusive to the batch above. I'm calling them proven behaviorally though.
- Qespu (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Seszo (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Laccol (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Takjamok (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- All accounts are
Blocked without tags. For future clerks/CUs: technically I doubt we're going to be able to confirm any future reports to this case, but CU is useful for sleepers. Closing. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:40, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
