User talk:TonyBallioni: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 22:35, 29 September 2018

TonyBallioni is busy and is going to be on Wikipedia in off-and-on doses, and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46

This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

For a special you....

	"Ass In High Gear Award"
	Your work as an admin is not being graded, But you still need to know it is much appreciated. You work to protect what pedians holds dear, While continuing to keep your ass in high gear. Thank you for all you do!! ^{^{Atsme✍🏻📧} 16:16, 21 September 2018 (UTC)}[reply]

Thank you, Atsme! It is appreciated!

TonyBallioni (talk) 18:38, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apology

I should not have made the comments I did at your CUOS candidacy - I should have done so on the editor's talk page, or in private. I've brought additional, needless drama to your candidacy, and I regret doing so - sorry - TNT ^💖 06:55, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, and no need to apologize to me. TonyBallioni (talk) 13:13, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you protected The Walking Dead: The Final Season?

Why did you protected The Walking Dead: The Final Season? I don't like it. Benjaminkirsc (talk) 10:29, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New Accounts were consistently adding information against consensus. You can request any edits you want made on the article talk page, though. TonyBallioni (talk) 11:34, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Undelete request.

Hi there, back in February you closed an AFD and deleted Mackenzie Harvey, a young cricketer who hadn't yet made his debut at senior level (didn't meet WP:CRIN). He's making his debut in senior list A cricket today (http://www.espncricinfo.com/series/8626/scorecard/1150097/victoria-vs-western-australia-10th-match-jlt-one-day-cup-2018-19). Could you please undelete the article. If you'd prefer to move it to draft or my sandbox, I'll update it later today. The-Pope (talk) 23:40, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Sorry Tony, I happened to be around. Drmies (talk) 23:42, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Dang Drmies, I was really hoping to see Tony have a conversation with the Pope. Natureium (talk)
  - Hmm I can see your point. Sorry. But they can still talk, and maybe about something more exciting than cricket. Drmies (talk) 23:45, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    - This would be a much more satisfying reply in these circumstances if I could call you reverend doctor instead of good doctor. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:05, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
      - I'm a minister in the ULC... Drmies (talk) 00:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
        I was guessing a bishop in the Union of Utrecht, ordination standards are about the same and its Dutch. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:34, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks all, but there is nothing more exciting than cricket. The-Pope (talk) 09:54, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing better than watching the Pope bat Galobtter (pingó mió) 11:00, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Misunderstanding

On my request for rollback, what did you mean by "specific days"? I was just wondering because I may have misunderstood what you meant there. StarlightStratosphere (talk) 23:53, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I meant that there 3-5 days that constituted most of your activity. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:08, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SPI

Sir, could you please consider a case here in Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mhdsuhail111. Even if Mollywood.lover and Sagar.kottappuram777 is unlikely, Mollywood.lover and Muhammed.suhail is the same person. It's that evident from their behavior and editing pattern. New account continues what the blocked ones did, which in turn was created solely to add exaggerated box office figures of Mammootty films.137.97.86.135 (talk) 17:20, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have no reason to doubt Bbb23’s judgement here, so I think letting that case lie is best. TonyBallioni (talk) 19:18, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No sir it's not about that, Bbb23 did fine, performed a technical inspection but unfortunately it was stale. So as a check user his duty is over. I believe some uninvolved administrator can now look into it and take an action based on their behavioral grounds. It's a clear case.137.97.112.150 (talk) 07:10, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I haven’t looked at this deeply, but I’m not willing to overrule another admin in this situation, sorry. If you have any questions about the SPI, you should talk to Bbb23. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:53, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SPI

Sorry I didn't know they were blocked. Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 19:28, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:51, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

KnightRises10 at AfC

At the start of the month, you declined an AfC request from KnightRises10. They've been doing some more work and asked me to help guide them with AfC which I've been doing. They are eager and seem to have a good general sense of notability, but still some room for growth around other areas. Would you have objections if they asked for AfC again? My thinking would be to guide and mentor them as they did so. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 22:29, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

They can apply again. I haven’t looked over their recent edits, so I don’t have an opinion either way. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:35, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 22:29, 29 September 2018 edit Barkeep49 (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Checkusers, New page reviewers, Oversighters, Administrators 40,533 edits →KnightRises10 at AfC: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:35, 29 September 2018 edit undo TonyBallioni (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Rollbackers 49,298 edits →KnightRises10 at AfC: re Next edit →
Line 76:		Line 76:

	At the start of the month, you declined an AfC request from KnightRises10. They've been doing some more work and asked me to help guide them with AfC which I've [[User:Barkeep49/NPPSchool/\|been doing]]. They are eager and seem to have a good general sense of notability, but still some room for growth around other areas. Would you have objections if they asked for AfC again? My thinking would be to guide and mentor them as they did so. Best, [[User:Barkeep49\|Barkeep49]] ([[User_talk:Barkeep49\|talk]]) 22:29, 29 September 2018 (UTC)		At the start of the month, you declined an AfC request from KnightRises10. They've been doing some more work and asked me to help guide them with AfC which I've [[User:Barkeep49/NPPSchool/\|been doing]]. They are eager and seem to have a good general sense of notability, but still some room for growth around other areas. Would you have objections if they asked for AfC again? My thinking would be to guide and mentor them as they did so. Best, [[User:Barkeep49\|Barkeep49]] ([[User_talk:Barkeep49\|talk]]) 22:29, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
			:They can apply again. I haven’t looked over their recent edits, so I don’t have an opinion either way. [[User:TonyBallioni\|TonyBallioni]] ([[User talk:TonyBallioni#top\|talk]]) 22:35, 29 September 2018 (UTC)