Jump to content

Nativity of Jesus: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
'the conversation between the angel and Matthew..' what is going on??
nazarene - syrian Xtian, matthean community in Syria - acc. to Ulrich Luz
Line 66: Line 66:
In a dream, the magi receive a divine warning of Herod's intent to kill the Jesus, whom he sees as a rival. Consequently, they return to their own country without telling Herod where to find Jesus. An angel tells Joseph to [[Flight into Egypt|flee with his family to Egypt]]. Meanwhile, Herod orders that all male children of Bethlehem under the age of two be killed, in the so-called "[[Massacre of the Innocents]]". Herod's statement in {{bibleverse||Matthew|2:16-18}} referring to boys two years or younger, suggests that the Magi arrived in Bethlehem a number of months after the birth of Jesus.<ref>''The New Testament'' by Bart D. Ehrman 1999 ISBN 0195126394 page 109</ref>
In a dream, the magi receive a divine warning of Herod's intent to kill the Jesus, whom he sees as a rival. Consequently, they return to their own country without telling Herod where to find Jesus. An angel tells Joseph to [[Flight into Egypt|flee with his family to Egypt]]. Meanwhile, Herod orders that all male children of Bethlehem under the age of two be killed, in the so-called "[[Massacre of the Innocents]]". Herod's statement in {{bibleverse||Matthew|2:16-18}} referring to boys two years or younger, suggests that the Magi arrived in Bethlehem a number of months after the birth of Jesus.<ref>''The New Testament'' by Bart D. Ehrman 1999 ISBN 0195126394 page 109</ref>


After Herod's death, the family return from Egypt, but they are afraid to return to Bethlehem because Herod's son rules Judea. Instead they move to [[Galilee]] and settle in [[Nazareth]], fulfilling, according to the author, a prophecy: "He will be called a Nazorean".<ref>{{bibleverse||Matthew|2:23}}.</ref>
After Herod's death, the family return from Egypt, but they are afraid to return to Bethlehem because Herod's son rules Judea. Instead they move to [[Galilee]] and settle in [[Nazareth]], fulfilling, according to the author, a prophecy: "He will be called a Nazorean".<ref>{{bibleverse||Matthew|2:23}}.</ref>


====Scenes from Matthew====
====Scenes from Matthew====
Line 127: Line 127:


===Jesus as a Nazorean===
===Jesus as a Nazorean===
The most difficult passage comes in the so-called prophecy at the very end, "He will be called a Nazorean." The Greek for this word is ''Ναζωραιος'', of uncertain etymology and meaning,<ref>{{Cite book | author=[[Barbara Aland|Aland, Barbara]]; [[Kurt Aland|Aland, Kurt]]; [[Carlo M. Martini|Martini, Carlo M.]]; [[Johannes Karavidopoulos|Karavidopoulos, Johannes]]; [[Bruce Metzger|Metzger, Bruce M.]] |title=Novum Testamentum Graece Et Latine—Greek/Latin New Testament | year=1983 | month=December | publisher=American Bible Society| isbn=3-438-05401-9 | page=5}}</ref> nor is there any prophecy to match it in the [[Hebrew bible]]. It may be referring to Judges 13:5, 7,<ref>Menken, Maarten J. J. "The Sources of the Old Testament Quotation in Matthew 2:23" ''Journal of Biblical Literature''120:3 (451-68), 467-8.</ref> "the boy shall be a [[Nazirite]]" (one consecrated to God, an ascetic); or to Isaiah 11:1, "A shoot shall come out from the stock of Jesse, and a branch (''netzer'') from his roots" (a prediction that a new ruler would emerge from the line of [[Jesse]], father of David);<ref>{{Cite book | last=Smith | first=Gary | authorlink=Gary Smith (theologian) | title=The New American Commentary: Isaiah 1-33, Vol. 15A (New American Commentary) | date=2007-08-30 | publisher=B&H Publishing Group |isbn=0-8054-0115-6 | page=268}}</ref> or it may be an involved word-play on the use of "nazirite," "Holy One of God," in Isaiah 4:3, meant to identify Jesus with the Nazoreans,<ref name="books.google.com.au"/> a Jewish sect who differed from the [[Pharisees]]only in regarding Jesus as the Messiah.<ref>[http://www.oxfordbiblicalstudies.com/article/opr/t257/e359 Oxford Biblical Studies ONline: Nazoreans]</ref>
The most difficult passage comes in the so-called prophecy at the very end, "He will be called a Nazorean." The Greek for this word is ''Ναζωραιος'', of uncertain etymology and meaning,<ref>{{Cite book | author=[[Barbara Aland|Aland, Barbara]]; [[Kurt Aland|Aland, Kurt]]; [[Carlo M. Martini|Martini, Carlo M.]]; [[Johannes Karavidopoulos|Karavidopoulos, Johannes]]; [[Bruce Metzger|Metzger, Bruce M.]] |title=Novum Testamentum Graece Et Latine—Greek/Latin New Testament | year=1983 | month=December | publisher=American Bible Society| isbn=3-438-05401-9 | page=5}}</ref> nor is there any prophecy to match it in the [[Hebrew bible]]. It may be referring to Judges 13:5, 7,<ref>Menken, Maarten J. J. "The Sources of the Old Testament Quotation in Matthew 2:23" ''Journal of Biblical Literature''120:3 (451-68), 467-8.</ref> "the boy shall be a [[Nazirite]]" (one consecrated to God, an ascetic); or to Isaiah 11:1, "A shoot shall come out from the stock of Jesse, and a branch (''netzer'') from his roots" (a prediction that a new ruler would emerge from the line of [[Jesse]], father of David);<ref>{{Cite book | last=Smith | first=Gary | authorlink=Gary Smith (theologian) | title=The New American Commentary: Isaiah 1-33, Vol. 15A (New American Commentary) | date=2007-08-30 | publisher=B&H Publishing Group |isbn=0-8054-0115-6 | page=268}}</ref> or it may be an involved word-play on the use of "nazirite," "Holy One of God," in Isaiah 4:3, meant to identify Jesus with the Nazoreans,<ref name="books.google.com.au"/> a Jewish sect who differed from the [[Pharisees]] only in regarding Jesus as the Messiah.<ref>[http://www.oxfordbiblicalstudies.com/article/opr/t257/e359 Oxford Biblical Studies ONline: Nazoreans]</ref> The German theologian [[w:de:Ulrich Luz]], who locates the Matthean community in Syria, has noted that [[Syrian Christians]] also called themselves [[Nazarenes]]. <ref> Ulrich luz, the Theology of the Gospel of Matthew, Cambridge University Press, p.18 </ref>


===Virgin birth and Jewish prophecy===
===Virgin birth and Jewish prophecy===

Revision as of 22:36, 27 January 2011

For other uses, see Nativity of Jesus (disambiguation).
Adoration of the Magi by Murillo, 17th century.

The Nativity of Jesus, or simply The Nativity, refers to the accounts of the birth of Jesus in two of the Canonical gospels and in various apocryphal texts.

New Testament accounts of the Nativity of Jesus appear only in the Gospel of Luke and the Gospel of Matthew. There has been debate among scholars as to whether these two accounts can be partially reconciled or if they are totally contradictory.[1] Some scholars view the narratives as non-historical[2][3] while others view the discussion of historicity as futile, given that Luke and Matthew do not seem concerned with presenting a historical narrative but shape their accounts to the traditions of their age.[4][5][6] Scholars of the historical Jesus generally do not consider much of the birth narratives to be historically useful.[7] Both gospels describe Jesus being born in Bethlehem, in Judea, to a virgin mother. Luke features the Christmas story,[8] in which Joseph and Mary, as part of a census, travel to Bethlehem, where Jesus is born and laid in a manger. Angels proclaim him a savior for all people, and shepherds come to adore him. In Matthew, wise men follow a star to Bethlehem to bring gifts to Jesus, born the king of the Jews. King Herod massacres all the toddler boys in Bethlehem to kill Jesus, but the holy family flees to Egypt and later settles in Nazareth.

The Nativity of Jesus in Christian theology concerns the Incarnation of Jesus in human form, free of sin and acting in obedience to and in fulfilment of the divine will of God, thereby undoing the damage caused by the fall of the first man, Adam, and opening the opportunity for salvation. Early debates about the theology of the Nativity resulted in early schisms in the Church by the 5th century. The main religious celebration among members of the Catholic Church and other Christian groups is the Church service on Christmas Eve or on the morning of Christmas Day. During the forty days leading up to Christmas, the Eastern Orthodox Church practices the Nativity Fast, while the majority of Christian congregations (including the Catholic Church, the Anglican Communion, many Mainline churches, and Baptists) begin observing the liturgical season of Advent four Sundays before Christmas—both are seen as times of spiritual cleansing, recollection and renewal to prepare for the celebration of the birth of Jesus.

The Artistic depiction of Nativity has been a major subject for Christian artists since the 4th century, both pictorial and sculptural, and the Nativity has inspired a large body of liturgical music, Christmas Carols and folk music. Since the 13th century, the Nativity scene has emphasized the humility of Jesus and promoted a more tender image of him.[9][10][11]

Canonical Gospels

The accounts of the Nativity of Jesus in the New Testament appear in only two of the four Canonical Gospels, namely the Gospel of Luke and the Gospel of Matthew. The biblical episodes surrounding the Nativity thus fall into three groups:[12][13][14][15]

  • The birth of Jesus: The account of the birth of Jesus in Bethlehem appears in both the Gospels of Matthew and Luke - which also includes the Adoration of the Shepherds by itself.

The Nativity accounts generally end with the return to Galilee and the next mention in the New Testament is Finding Jesus in the Temple several years later.[12][15]

Luke's story takes place mostly before the birth of Jesus and centers on Mary, while Matthew's story takes place mostly after the birth of Jesus and centers on Joseph.[16][17][18]

Gospel of Luke

See also: Annunciation, Visitation of Mary, Annunciation to the shepherds, and Adoration of the shepherds
Angel Gabriel's Annunciation to Mary, by Murillo, c. 1655

The Nativity is a prominent element of the Gospel of Luke, and comprises over 10% of the text. It is three times the length of the Nativity text in the Gospel of Matthew and in itself longer than several of the books of the New Testament.[19] Luke does not rush into the birth of Jesus, but prepares for the event by narrating several episodes prior to the birth of Jesus.[19] Luke is the only Gospel to provide an account of the birth of John the Baptist, and he uses it to draw parallels between the births of John and Jesus.[20]

Luke draws parallels between the angelic visit (1:5-25) to Zachariah about the birth of John and the Annunciation to Mary (1:26-38) about the birth of Jesus. He also draws parallels between the Song of Zechariah (1:57-80) about John and the Song of Simeon (2:1-40) about Jesus.[20] However, while Luke devotes only 2 verses (1:57-58) to the birth of John, the birth of Jesus is narrated in twenty verses (2:1-20).[21] Luke relates the two birth in the visitation of Mary to Elizabeth.[19] He further connects the two births by noting that Mary and Elizabeth are cousins.[22]

In the Gospel of Luke, Mary learns from the angel Gabriel that she will conceive and bear a child called Jesus. When she asks how this can be, since she is a virgin, he tells her that the Holy Spirit would "come upon her" and that "nothing will be impossible with God". She responds: "Here am I, the servant of the Lord; let it be with me according to your word".[23] Later Mary visits her relative Elizabeth, who is pregnant with John the Baptist. John leaps in his mother's womb, recognizing the presence of Jesus, the Messiah.

When Mary is due to give birth, she and Joseph travel from Nazareth to Joseph's ancestral home in Bethlehem to register in the census of Quirinius. Mary gives birth to Jesus and, having found no place for themselves in the inn, places the newborn in a manger.[24]

An angel of the Lord visits the shepherds and brings them "good news of great joy": "to you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, who is the Messiah, the Lord." The angel tells them they will find a child wrapped in bands of cloth and lying in a manger. The angel is joined by a "heavenly host" who say "Glory to God in the highest heaven, and on earth peace among those whom he favors.[25] The shepherds hurry to the stable in Bethlehem where they find Jesus with Mary and Joseph. They repeat what they have been told by the angel, and then, they return to their flocks.[26] Mary and Joseph take Jesus to Jerusalem to be circumcised,[27] before returning to their home in Nazareth.[28]

Scenes from Luke

Gospel of Matthew

A page from an 11th century Gospel of Matthew (1:18-21), with Matthew 1:21[37], providing the origin of the name Jesus.[38]

The Nativity appears in chapters 1 and 2 of the Gospel of Matthew in which Matthew places special emphasis on the origins of the names of the child and two specific passages, namely from 1:21-23, have theological significance in that they refer to the names Jesus and Emmanuel.[39][40][38]

Following the bethrothal of Joseph and Mary in Matthew 1:18, Joseph is troubled in Matthew 1:19-20|131[41] because Mary is pregnant but in the first of Joseph's three dreams an angel assures him not be afraid to take Mary as his wife, because her child was conceived by the Holy Spirit.[42]

The message of the angel to Joseph in Matthew 1:21[43] includes the origin of the name Jesus, and has salvific implications when the angel instructs Joseph: "you shall call his name Jesus, for he will save his people from their sins".[38][44] It is the only place in the New Testament where "saves his people" appears with "sins".[45]

Scholars have debated whether Matthew 1:22-23[46] is spoken by the angel or by Matthew.[47] However, Matthew 1:23 does provide the basis for the use of the name "Emmanuel", which means "God is with us".[39] The name Emmanuel (from the Hebrew words: אֵל ’El, i.e. 'God' and עִמָּנוּ i.e. ʻImmānū, 'with us') is related to Isiah 7:14[48] and is one of almost a dozen cases in his Gospel where while discussing Jesus as the fulfillment of prophecies, Matthew points back to one of the prophets.[39][40]

In Matthew 2:1-12 the Star of Bethlehem reveals the birth of Jesus to a number (traditionally three) of Magi, (Greek μάγος), commonly translated as "wise man")[49][50] who travel to Jerusalem from an unspecified country "in the east".[51] In Matthew 2:2 the Magi follow His star, believing it to announce the birth of the king of the Jews.

The Magi go to see Herod the Great and ask where they can find the one born "King of the Jews." Herod asks his advisers where the Messiah was to be born. They answer Bethlehem, the birthplace of King David, and quote the prophet Micah as in Matthew 2:4–6.[52] Herod tells the Magi to go to Bethlehem and to report back to him when they have found the child.

As the Magi travel to Bethlehem, the star "goes before" them and leads them to a house where they find and adore Jesus. They present Jesus with gifts of gold, frankincense, and myrrh, in Matthew 2:9–11. In a dream, the magi receive a divine warning of Herod's intent to kill the Jesus, whom he sees as a rival. Consequently, they return to their own country without telling Herod where to find Jesus. An angel tells Joseph to flee with his family to Egypt. Meanwhile, Herod orders that all male children of Bethlehem under the age of two be killed, in the so-called "Massacre of the Innocents". Herod's statement in Matthew 2:16–18 referring to boys two years or younger, suggests that the Magi arrived in Bethlehem a number of months after the birth of Jesus.[53]

After Herod's death, the family return from Egypt, but they are afraid to return to Bethlehem because Herod's son rules Judea. Instead they move to Galilee and settle in Nazareth, fulfilling, according to the author, a prophecy: "He will be called a Nazorean".[54]

Scenes from Matthew

Historical and scholarly analysis

See also: Genealogy of Jesus, Massacre of the Innocents, and Historicity of Jesus
Gospel of Luke, 1600.

The birth narratives have been considered problematic by a number of critical scholars particularly because they are laced with theology and are indebted to precursor texts.[7] The Gospels present two different accounts:[55] the Gospel of Matthew relates the appearance of an angel, in a dream, to Joseph; the wise men from the east; the massacre of the innocents; and the flight to Egypt. The Gospel of Luke mentions none of these but describes the conception and birth of Jesus; the appearance of an angel to Mary; the worldwide census; the birth in a manger, and the choir of angels; none of these is mentioned in Matthew.[56] Robert Joseph Miller considers the two accounts irreconcilable, apart from the two annunciations and the stories about John.[57][citation needed]

Nevertheless, the birth narratives do contain some useful biographical information. For example, Jesus being born near the end of Herod's reign and his father being named Joseph are considered historically plausible.[7][58]

Traditional view

Traditionally, the narratives have been considered the inerrant Word of God. Some prominent, contemporary Christian scholars maintain the traditional view, arguing that the two accounts are historically accurate, and do not contradict each other, pointing to the similarities between the two accounts,[59] such as the birth place of Bethlehem, and the Virgin Birth. Cox and Easley have attempted to show how the text from both narratives can be interwoven to create one coherent account.[60]

Historical-critical analysis

Modern Bible scholars seek to understand the books of the Bible roughly the same way they seek to understand other ancient works, attempting to discern who wrote them, when, based on what sources, and toward what ends.

Historical-critical scholars generally conclude that Matthew and Luke were written by anonymous Christians writing after the fall of the Jewish temple in AD 70. Both used the Gospel of Mark and an inferred text called Q, but the birth narratives come from the evangelists' independent sources (known and M-Source for Matthew and L source for Luke). The birth narratives seem to be late additions to the gospel story, which would explain why they don't agree with each other.[61] Matthew wrote his Gospel for a Jewish audience, and Luke wrote his for a Gentile one.

The narratives are partly modeled on Scripture. Matthew uses quotations from Jewish scripture, scenes reminiscent of Moses' life, and a numerical pattern in his genealogy to identify Jesus as a son of David, of God, and of Abraham. Luke's prelude is much longer, emphasizing the age of the Holy Spirit and the arrival of a savior for all people, Jew and Gentile.[62]

Helmut Koester writes that while Matthew's narrative was formed in a biblical environment, Luke's was modeled to appeal to the Greco-Roman world.[63] In particular, according to him, while shepherds were looked negatively by Jews in Jesus' time, they are seen in Greco-Roman culture as symbols of a golden age when gods and humans lived in peace and nature was at harmony.[63]

Both Matthew and Luke associate Jesus' birth with the time of King Herod, and historians therefore estimate Jesus was born around 4 BC, when Herod died.

Date and place of birth

See also: Chronology of Jesus and Anno Domini
Altar in the Church of the Nativity, Bethlehem.

The nativity accounts in the New Testament gospels of Matthew and Luke do not mention a date or time of year for the birth of Jesus. The Gospel of Matthew places Jesus' birth under the reign of Herod the Great, who died in 4 BC. The Gospel of Luke dates the birth ten years after Herod's death during the census of Quirinius, described by the historian Josephus.[64] Most critical scholars believe that Luke was simply mistaken,[65] but other scholars have attempted to reconcile its account with the details given by Josephus.[66][67] For instance, Steven Cox and Kendell Easley list four separate approaches to a solution, ranging from a grammatical approach to the translation of the Greek word prote used in Luke to be read as "registration before Quirinius was governor of Syria" to archeological arguments and references to Tertullian that indicate that a "two step census" was performed, involving an early registration.[60][68][69][70]

The Gospels of both Matthew and Luke place the birth of Jesus in Bethlehem.[71][72] Matthew does not explicitly state that Joseph lived in Bethlehem prior to the birth of Jesus,[73] however scholars have concluded that in Matthew, Joseph and Mary apparently live in Bethlehem before the birth.[2][3][74] Scholars question the birth narratives because they conflict with each other or with historical plausibility. Luke's account contradicts Matthew's as to Jesus' genealogy,[3] Joseph's original home (Bethlehem or Nazareth),[3] the year of Jesus' birth (during Herod's reign or during Quirinius' census),[3] and where Joseph took his family when they left Jerusalem (Egypt or Nazareth).

The Gospel of Luke account states that Mary gave birth to Jesus and laid him in a manger “because there was no place for them in the inn," but does not say exactly where Jesus was born.[75] The Greek word kataluma may be translated as either “inn” or “guestroom”, and some scholars have speculated that Joseph and Mary may have sought to stay with relatives, rather than in an inn, only to find the house full (whereupon they resorted to the shelter of a room with a manger[76]).

The two accounts explain the birth in Bethlehem in contradictory ways[2][3] and give two different genealogies of Jesus.[77] The nativity stories are generally not looked at as primarily historical accounts[7] with Vermes and Sanders dismissing them as completely fictional[78][79] and Brown seeing them as constructed from historical traditions which predate the Gospels.[80] The account in Matthew is based on an earlier narrative patterned on traditions about the birth of Moses.[81]

Luke's census, in which everyone was expected to return to his ancestral home, is not credible.[3] Emperor Augustus, known for being rational, would not have uprooted everyone in the Empire by forcing them to return to their ancestral cities.[3] Furthermore, people were not able to trace their own lineages back forty-two generations, as Joseph is said to do.[3]

In the 2nd century, Justin Martyr stated that Jesus had been born in a cave outside the town, while the Protoevangelium of James described a legendary birth in a cave nearby.[82][83] The Church of the Nativity inside the town, built by St. Helena, contains the cave-manger site traditionally venerated as the birthplace of Jesus, which may have originally been a site of the cult of the god Tammuz.[84] In Contra Celsum 1.51, Origen, who from around 215 travelled throughout Palestine wrote of the "manger of Jesus".[85]

The Quran, like the Gospels, places the virgin birth of Jesus in Bethlehem.[86][87][88] In Islam, the prophet Muhammad is said to have been born 570 years after the birth of Jesus.[89]

Massacre of the Innocents

Main article: Massacre of the Innocents

If the Massacre of the Innocents had taken place, it would be strange for Josephus not to mention it, and that the massacre may hence be non-historical.[90] Josephus' writing dwelt on Herod's cruelty, so he likely would have included the event if it had occurred.[3] Faced with little historical information, Matthew apparently based the story in which an infant Moses is endangered by the Pharaoh's order to kill infant Hebrews.[3] Such use of scripture for telling the story of Jesus' birth was considered legitimate by contemporary standards.[3] Paul L. Maier, on the other hand, argues that Bethlehem was a small town and that the massacre was too small an event for Josephus to have heard of, given that it was over forty years before his birth.[91]

Jesus as a Nazorean

The most difficult passage comes in the so-called prophecy at the very end, "He will be called a Nazorean." The Greek for this word is Ναζωραιος, of uncertain etymology and meaning,[92] nor is there any prophecy to match it in the Hebrew bible. It may be referring to Judges 13:5, 7,[93] "the boy shall be a Nazirite" (one consecrated to God, an ascetic); or to Isaiah 11:1, "A shoot shall come out from the stock of Jesse, and a branch (netzer) from his roots" (a prediction that a new ruler would emerge from the line of Jesse, father of David);[94] or it may be an involved word-play on the use of "nazirite," "Holy One of God," in Isaiah 4:3, meant to identify Jesus with the Nazoreans,[95] a Jewish sect who differed from the Pharisees only in regarding Jesus as the Messiah.[96] The German theologian w:de:Ulrich Luz, who locates the Matthean community in Syria, has noted that Syrian Christians also called themselves Nazarenes. [97]

Virgin birth and Jewish prophecy

Gospel of Matthew, 1700.

In Matthew, "an angel of the Lord" appears to Mary's betrothed husband Joseph in a dream and tells him: "she will bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus, for he will save his people from their sins". The text continues with the comment: "All this happened to fulfil what the Lord had spoken by the prophet: 'Behold the virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and his name shall be called Emmanuel, which being interpreted is God with us'".[98] Some 5-6th century manuscripts of the Gospel of Matthew, such as Codex Bezae Cantabrigensis, read "Isaiah the prophet" instead of merely "the prophet", but this does not have the support of other important textual witnesses, such as Codex Sinaiticus.[99]

Rather than using the Masoretic text which forms the basis of most modern Christian Old Testament translations, the Gospel of Matthew's quotation is taken from the Septuagint. The verb кαλεω kaleō (to call) is found both in the citation from Isaiah and in the words of Gabriel; but whilst the former employs the third person plural (they shall call), the latter has the second person singular you shall call. Gabriel himself therefore is not applying Isaiah's prophecy to Joseph, but his purpose is to invite him to assume legal paternity of the son to be born of Mary by naming him. It is the following comment that explains Mary's conception by the Holy Spirit, Joseph's vocation as the child's legal father, and the child's own vocation as the Saviour of his people as indicated by the name Jesus, in the light of Isaiah's prophecy that henceforth "God is with us".[citation needed]

Scholars have other concerns with the text's reference to Isaiah. The Gospel of Matthew agrees with the Septuagint text of Isaiah in rendering the Greek term "parthenos" as "virgin", but the much older Masoretic text of Isaiah uses the Hebrew word "almah", which could mean "maiden," "young woman," or "virgin." The translators of the Septuagint in Alexandria during the 3rd century BCE understood the Hebrew word "almah" to mean virgin in this context.[100]

Jewish and gentile themes

Matthew's nativity has been interpreted as depicting Jesus as the King of the Jews, to whom the magi pay tribute. His genealogy goes back to Abraham, and he often resembles Moses. Luke's nativity depicts Jesus as a savior for all people. His genealogy goes back to Adam, demonstrating his common humanity, as do the lowly circumstances of his birth. Luke, writing for a gentile audience, portrays Christianity as open to gentiles right from the start.

Matthew's Nativity narrative has also been interpreted as casting Jesus in the role of being a second Moses: like Moses, the infant Jesus is saved from a murderous tyrant; like Moses, he flees the country of his birth until his persecutor is dead and it is safe to return; like Moses, he is the saviour of his people.[95]

Christian theology

The theological significance of the Nativity of Jesus has been a key element in Christian teachings, from the early Church Fathers to 20th century theologians.[101][102][103] The theological issues were addressed as early as Apostle Paul, but continued to be debated and eventually lead to both Christological and Mariological differences among Christians that resulted in early schisms within the Church by the 5th century.

Birth of the new man

Nativity at Night, by Geertgen tot Sint Jans, c. 1490

.

He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation. For by him all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible. — Colossians 1:15–16 presents the birth of Jesus as the model for all creation.[104][105][106][107]

Apostle Paul viewed the birth of Jesus as an event of cosmic significance which brought forth a "new man" who undid the damage caused by the fall of the first man, Adam. Just as the Johannine view of Jesus as the incarnate Logos proclaims the universal relevance of his birth, the Pauline perspective emphasizes the birth of a new man and a new world in the birth of Jesus.[108] Paul's eschatological view of Jesus counter-positions him as a new man of morality and obedience, in contrast to Adam. Unlike Adam, the new man born in Jesus obeys God and ushers in a world of morality and salvation.[108]

In the Pauline view, Adam is positioned as the first man and Jesus as the second: Adam, having corrupted himself by his disobedience, also infected humanity and left it with a curse as inheritance. The birth of Jesus, on the other hand, counter-balanced the fall of Adam, bringing forth redemption and repairing the damage done by Adam.[109]

In patristic theology, Paul's contrasting of Jesus as the new man versus Adam provided a framework for discussing the uniqueness of the birth of Jesus and the ensuing events of his life. The Nativity of Jesus thus began to serve as the starting point for "cosmic Christology" in which the birth, life and Resurrection of Jesus have universal implications.[108][110][111] The concept of Jesus as the "new man" repeats in the cycle of birth and re-birth of Jesus from his Nativity to his Resurrection: following his birth, through his morality and obedience to the Father, Jesus began a new harmony in the relationship between God the Father and man. The Nativity and Resurrection of Jesus thus created the author and exemplar of a new humanity.[112]

Church Father Irenaeus echoed that theology in the 2nd century by writing:

"When He became incarnate and was made man, He commenced afresh the long line of human beings, and furnished us, in a brief, comprehensive manner, with salvation ; so that what we had lost in Adam - namely to be according to the image and likeness of God- that we might recover in Christ Jesus."[102][103]

Irenaeus was also one of the early theologians to use the analogy of "second Adam and second Eve". He suggested the Virgin Mary as the "second eve" and wrote that the Virgin Mary had "untied the knot of sin bound up by the virgin Eve" and that just as Eve had tempted Adam to disobey God, Mary had set a path of obedience for the second Adam (i.e. Jesus) from the Annunciation to Calvary so that Jesus could bring about salvation, undoing the damage of Adam.[113]

In the 4th century, this uniqueness of the circumstances related to the Nativity of Jesus, and their interplay with the mystery of the incarnation became a central element in both the theology and hymnody of Saint Ephrem the Syrian. For him, the uniqueness of the Nativity of Jesus was supplemented with the sign of the Majesty of the Creator through the ability of a powerful God to enter the world as a small newborn.[114]

In the Middle Ages the birth of Jesus as the second Adam came to be seen in the context of Saint Augustine's Felix culpa (i.e. happy fall) and was intertwined with the popular teachings on the fall from grace of Adam and Eve.[115] Augustine was fond of a statement on Nativity by Saint Gregory of Nyssa and he quoted in five times: "Venerate the Nativity, through which you are freed from the bonds of an earthly nativity".[116] And he liked to quote 1Corinthians 15:22: "Just as in Adam all of us died, so too in Christ all of us will be brought to life".[116]

The theology persisted into the Protestant Reformation, and second Adam was one of the six modes of atonement discussed by John Calvin.[117] In the 20th century, leading theologian Karl Barth continued the same line of reasoning and viewed the Nativity of Jesus as the birth of a new man who succeeded Adam. In Barth's theology, in contrast to Adam, Jesus acted as an obedient Son in the fulfilment of the divine will and was therefore free from sin and could hence reveal the righteousness of God the Father and bring about salvation.[101]

Christology of Nativity

In Summa Theologiæ, (1471 copy shown here) Thomas Aquinas addressed many of the open Christoligical questions regarding the Nativity of Jesus.

The Nativity of Jesus impacts the Christological issues about his Person from the earliest days of Christianity. The belief in the divinity of Jesus leads to the question: "was Jesus a man to be born of a woman or was he God born of a woman?" A wide range of hypotheses and beliefs regarding the nature of the Nativity of Jesus were presented in the first four centuries of Christianity. Some of the debates involved the title Theotokos (God bearer) for the Virgin Mary and began to illustrate the impact of Mariology on Christology. Some of these viewpoints were eventually declared as heresies, others led to schisms and the formation of new branches of the Church.[118][119][120][121]

A number of ecumenical councils were convened in the 4th and 5th centuries to deal with these issues. The Council of Ehesus debated hyposthasis (co-existing natures) versus Monophysitism (only one nature) versus Miaphysitism (two natures united as one) versus Nestorianism (disunion of two natures).[122][123] The 451 Council of Chalcedon was highly influential and marked a key turning point in the Christological debates that broke apart the church of the Eastern Roman Empire in the 5th century. In Chalcedon the Hypostatic union was decreed, namely that Jesus is both fully divine and fully human, making this part of the creed of Orthodox Christianity.[124][125][126][127]

In the 5th century, leading Church Father Pope Leo I used the Nativity as a key element of his theology. Leo gave 10 sermons on Nativity and 7 have survived, the one on December 25, 451 demonstrates his concern to increase the importance of the feast of nativity and along with it emphasize the two natures of Christ in defense of the Christological doctrine of Hypostatic union.[128] Leo often used his Nativity sermons as an occasion to attack opposing viewpoints, without naming the opposition. Thus Leo used the occasion of the Nativity feast to establish boundaries for what could be considered a heresy. regarding the birth and nature of Christ.[118]

In the 13th century Saint Thomas Aquinas addressed the Christologocal attribution of the Nativity: Should it be attributed to the person (the Word) or only to the assumed human nature of that person. Aquinas treated Nativity in 8 separate articles in Summa Theologica each posing a separate question, e.g.: "Does Nativity regard the nature rather than the Person?", "Should a temporal Nativity be attributed to Christ?" "Should the Blessed Virgin be called Christ's Mother?", "Should the Blessed Virgin be called the Mother of God?", "Are there two filiations in Christ?", etc.[129] To deal with this issue, Aquinas distinguishes between the person born and the nature in which the birth takes place.[130] Aquinas thus resolved the question by arguing that in the Hypostatic union Christ has two natures, one received from the Father from eternity, the other from his mother in time. This approach also resolved the Mariological problem of Mary receiving the title of Theotokos for under this scenario she is the "Mother of God".[130]

During the Reformation, John Calvin argued that Jesus was not sanctified to be "Gad manifested as Incarnate" (Deus manifestatus in carne) only due to his Virgin Birth, but through the action of the Holy Spirit at the instant of his birth. Thus Calvin argued that Jesus was exempt from original sin because he was sanctified at the moment of birth so that his generation was without blemish; as generation has been blemishless before the fall of Adam.[131]

Impact on Christianity

Feasts and liturgical elements

Nativity scene in Baumkirchen, Austria.

In the 1st and 2nd centuries, the Lord's Day (Sunday) was the earliest Christian celebration and included a number of theological themes. In the 2nd century, the Resurrection of Jesus become a separate feast as Easter and in the same century Epiphany began to be celebrated in the Churches of the East on January 6.[132] The celebration of the feast of the Magi on January 6 may relate to a pre-Christian celebration for the blessing of the Nile in Egypt on January 5, but this is not historically certain.[133] The festival of the Nativity which later turned into Christmas was a 4th century feast in the Western Church notably in Rome and North Africa, although it is uncertain exactly where and when it was first celebrated.[134]

There is historical evidence that by the middle of the 4th century the Christian churches of the East celebrated the birth and Baptism of Jesus on the same day, on January 6 while those in the West celebrated a Nativity feast on December 25 (perhaps influenced by the Winter solstice); and that by the last quarter of the 4th century, the calendars of both churches included both feasts.[135] The earliest suggestions of a fast of Baptism of Jesus on January 6 during the 2nd century comes from Clement of Alexandria, but there is no further mention of such a feast until 361 when Emperor Julian attended a feast on January 6 in the year 361.[135]

The Chronography of 354 illuminated manuscript compiled in Rome includes an early reference to the celebration of a Nativity feast.[136] In a sermon delivered in Antioch on December 25, c. 386, Saint John Chrysostom provides specific information about the feats there, stating that the feast had existed for about 10 years.[135] By around 385 the feast for the birth of Jesus was distinct from that of the Baptism and was held on December 25 in Constantinople, Nyssa and Amaseia. In a sermon in 386, Gregory of Nyssa specifically related the feast of Nativity with that of the martyrdom of Saint Stephen, celebrated a day later. By 390 the feast was also held in Iconium on that day.[135]

Pope Leo I established a feast of the "Mystery of Incarnation" in the 5th century, in effect as the first formal feast for the Nativity of Jesus. Leo gave 10 sermons on Nativity and 7 have survived, the one on December 25, 451 demonstrates his concern to increas ethe importance of the feast.[128] Pope Sixtus III then instituted the practice of Midnight Mass just before that feast.[137] In the 6th century, Emperor Justinian declared Christmas to be a legal holiday.[138]

In the 14th and 15th centuries, the theological importance of the Nativity of Jesus, was coupled with an emphasis on the loving nature of Child Jesus in sermons by figures such as Jean Gerson. In his sermons Gerson emphasized the loving nature of Jesus at his Nativity, as well as his cosmic plan for the salvation of mankind.[139]

By the early part of the 20th century, Christmas had become a "cultural signature" of Christianity and indeed of the Western culture even in countries such as the United States which are officially non-religious. By the beginning of the 21st century these countries began to pay more attention to the sensitivities of non-Christians during the festivities at the end of the calendar year.[140]

Transforming the image of Jesus

Paper on wood Nativity scene from 1750, Milan, presenting a tender image of Jesus.

Early Christians viewed Jesus as "the Lord" and the word Kyrios appears over 700 times in the New Testament, referring to him.[141] The use of the word Kyrios in the Septuagint Bible also assigned to Jesus the Old Testament attributes of an omnipotent God.[141] The use of the term Kyrios, and hence the Lordship of Jesus, predated the Pauline epistles, but Saint Paul expanded and elaborated on that topic.[141]

Pauline writings established the Kyrios image and attributes of Jesus as not only referring to his eschatological victory but to him as the "divine image" (Greek εἰκών eikōn) in whose face the glory of God shines forth. This image persisted among Christians as the predominant perception of Jesus for a number of centuries.[142] More than any other title, Kyrios defined the relationship between Jesus and those who believed in him as Christ: Jesus was their Lord and Master who was to be served with all their hearts and who would one day judge their actions throughout their lives.[143]

The lordship attributes associated with the Kyrios image of Jesus also implied that all the invisible powers of creation were subject to him, and that as in Philippians 2:10 : "at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth". Paul then looked back and reasoned that the final lordship of Jesus was prepared from the very beginning, starting with pre-existence and the Nativity, based on his obedience as the image of God.[144] Over time, based on the influence of Anselm of Canterbury, Bernard of Clairvaux and others, the Kyrios image of Jesus began to be supplemented with a more "tender image of Jesus", and the Franciscan approach to popular piety was instrumental in establishing this image.[145]

The 13th century witnessed a major turning point in the development of a new "tender image of Jesus" within Christianity, as the Franciscans began to emphasize the humility of Jesus both at his birth and his death. The construction of the Nativity scene by Saint Francis of Assisi was instrumental in portraying a softer image of Jesus that contrasted with the powerful and radiant image at the Transfiguration, and emphasized how God had taken a humble path to his own birth.[9] As the Black Death raged in Medieval Europe, two mendicant orders of Franciscans and Dominicans helped the faithful cope with tragedies. One element of the Franciscan approach was the emphasis on the humility of Jesus and the poverty of his birth: the image of God was the image of Jesus, not a severe and punishing God, but himself humble at birth and sacrificed at death.[10] The concept that the omnipotent Creator would set aside all power in order to conquer the hearts of men by love and that he would have been helplessly placed in a manger was as marvelous and as touching to the believers as the sacrifice of dying on the cross in Calavry.[11]

Thus by the 13th century the tender joys of the Nativity of Jesus were added to the agony of his Crucifixion and a whole new range of approved religious emotions were ushered in, with wide ranging cultural impacts for centuries thereafter.[11] The Franciscans approached both ends of this spectrum of emotions. On one hand the introduction of the Nativity scene encouraged the tender image of Jesus, while on the other hand Francis of Assisi himself had a deep attachment to the sufferings of Jesus on the Cross and was said to have recevieved the Stigmata as an expression of that love. The dual nature of Franciscan piety based both on joy of Nativity and the sacrifice at Calvary had a deep appeal among city dwellers and as the Franciscan Friars traveled, these emotions spread across the world, transforming the Kyrios image of Jesus to a more tender, loving, and compassionate image.[11] These traditions did not remain limited to Europe and soon spread to the other parts of the world such as Latin America, the Philippines and the United States.[146][147]

According to Archbishop Rowan Williams this transformation, accompanied by the proliferation of the tender image of Jesus in Madonna and Child paintings made an important impact within the Christian Ministry by allowing Christians to feel the living presence of Jesus as a loving figure "who is always there to harbor and nurture those who turn to him for help.[148][149]

Hymns, art and music

Canticles appearing in Luke

Luke's Nativity text has given rise to four well known canticles: the Benedictus and the Magnificat in the first chapter, and the Gloria in Excelsis and the Nunc dimittis in the second chapter.[150] These "Gospel canticles" are now an integral part of the Christian liturgical tradition.[151] The parallel structure in Luke regarding the births of John the Baptist and Jesus, extends to the three canticles Benedictus (Song of Zechariah), the Nunc dimittis and the Magnificat.[152]

The Magnificat, in Luke 1:46–55, is spoken by Mary and is one of the 8 most ancient Christian hymns and perhaps the earliest Marian hymn.[153] The Benedictus, in Luke 1:68–79, is spoken by Zechariah, while the Nunc dimittis, in Luke 2:29–32 is spoken by Simeon.[154] The traditional Gloria in Excelsis is longer than the opening line presented in Luke 2:14, and is often called the "Song of the Angels" given that it was uttered by the angels in the Annunciation to the Shepherds.[155]

The three canticles Benedictus, Nuc Dimittis and the Magnificat, if not originating with Luke himself, may have their roots in the earliest Christian liturgical services in Jerusalem, but their exact origins remain unknown.[156]

Visual arts

See also: Nativity of Jesus in art
Annunciation by Nesterov, 19th century, Russia.

The earliest artistic depictions of Nativity of Jesus were in the catacombs and on sarcophagi in Rome. As Gentile visitors, the Magi were popular in these scenes which also played on the cycle of birth and death of jesus and its cosmic significance by depicting Adam and Eve. However, the inherent message of humility and poverty built into the Nativity of Jesus did not sit well with some wealthy Romans who emblished the scene to the point that eventually Mary was seated on a throne as the Magi visited.[157] By the 14th century, images of Mary which combined humble earthly and regal heavenly attributes were appearing, e.g. in the depictions of the Madonna of humility.[158]

Depictions of the Nativity are now a normal component of the sequences illustrating both the Life of Christ and the Life of the Virgin. The icons of Nativity also carry the message of redemption: God's unification with matter forms the mystery of the Incarnation, a turning point in the Christian perspective on Salvation.[159]

In the Eastern Church icons of Nativity often correspond to specific hymns to Mary, e.g. to the Kontakion: "The Virgin today bringeth forth the Transubstantial, and the eart offereth a cave to the Unapproachable...."[160] In many Eastern icons of Nativity (often accompanied by matching hymnody) two basic elements are emphasized. First the event portrays the mystery of incarnation as a foundation for the Christian faith, and the combined nature of Christ as Divine and human. Secondly, it relates the event to the natural life of the world, and its consequences for humanity. According to Saint Gregory of Nyssa, the feast of Nativity in the Eastern Church is not a festival of creation, but of re-creation and renewal.[160]

Hymns, music and performances

See also: Christmas music and Nativity play
A Christmas carol card, Boston, 1880.

Like 1st century Jews, early Christians rejected the use of musical instruments in religious ceremonies and instead relied on chants and plainsong leading to the use of the term a cappella (in the chapel) for these chants.

One of the earliest Nativity hymns was Veni, Redemptor Gentium composed by Saint Ambrose in Milan in the 4th century. By the beginning of the 5th century, the Spanish poet Prudentius had written "From the Heart of the Father" where the ninth stanza focused on the Nativity and portrayed Jesus as, in fact, the creator of the universe. In the 5th century the Gallic poet Sedulius composed "From the lands that see the Sun arise" in which the humility of the birth of Jesus was portrayed.[157] The Magnificat, one of the 8 most ancient Christian hymns and perhaps the earliest Marian hymn is based on the Annunciation.[153][154]

Saint Romanus the Melodist had a dream of the Virgin Mary the night before the feast of the Nativity, and when he woke up the next morning, composed his first hymn "On the Nativity" and continued composing hymns (perhaps several hundred) to the end of his life.[161] Re-enactments of Nativity which are now called Nativity plays were part of the troparion hymns in the liturgy of Byzantine Rite Churches, from Sophronius in the 7th century.[162] By the 13th century, the Franciscans had encouraged a strong tradition of popular Christmas songs in the native languages.[163] Christmas carols in English first appear in a 1426 work of John Awdlay, a Shropshire chaplain, who lists twenty-five "caroles of Cristemas".[164]

The largest body of musical works about Christ in which he does not speak are about the Nativity. A large body of liturgical music, as well as a great deal of para-liturgical texts, Carols and folk music exist about the Nativity of Jesus. The Christmas Carols have come to be viewed as a cultural-signature of the Nativity of Jesus.[165]

Most musical Nativity narrations are not biblical and did not come about until church music assimilated opera in the 17th century. But thereafter there was a torrent of new music, e.g. Heinrich Schutz's 1660 The Christmas Story and Bach's Christmas Oratorio in the 18th century. And Lisz's Christus, etc.[165] John Milton's classic 1629 poem Ode on the Morning of Christ's Nativity was used by John McEwan in 1901.[165]

See also

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Nativity.

References

  1. ^ The Gospel of Matthew by Daniel J. Harrington 1991 ISBN 0814658032 page 47
  2. ^ a b c Vermes, Géza (2006-11-02). The Nativity: History and Legend. Penguin Books Ltd. p. 64. ISBN 0-14-102446-1.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Sanders, E. P. The historical figure of Jesus. Penguin, 1993. Sanders discusses both birth narratives in detail, contrasts them, and judges them not historical on p. 85–88.
  4. ^ Jesus, the Christ: Contemporary Perspectives by Brennan R. Hill 2004 ISBN 1585953032 page 89
  5. ^ The Gospel of Luke by Timothy Johnson 1992 ISBN 0814658059 page 72
  6. ^ Recovering Jesus: the witness of the New Testament Thomas R. Yoder Neufeld 2007 ISBN 1587432021 page 111
  7. ^ a b c d The New Interpreter's Dictionary of the Bible: Volume 3 Abingdon Press, 2008. pp. 42, 269.
  8. ^ "biblical literature." Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Encyclopædia Britannica, 2011. Web. 22 Jan. 2011. [1].
  9. ^ a b The image of St Francis by Rosalind B. Brooke 2006 ISBN 0521782910 pages 183-184
  10. ^ a b The tradition of Catholic prayer by Christian Raab, Harry Hagan, St. Meinrad Archabbey 2007 ISBN 0814631843 pages 86-87
  11. ^ a b c d The vitality of the Christian tradition by George Finger Thomas 1944 ISBN 0836923782 page 110-112
  12. ^ a b A Dictionary of biblical tradition in English literature by David L. Jeffrey 1993 ISBN 0802836348 pages 538-540
  13. ^ Steven L. Cox, Kendell H Easley, 2007 Harmony of the Gospels ISBN 0-8054-9444-8 pages 30-37
  14. ^ Who's Who in the New Testament by Ronald Brownrigg, Canon Brownrigg 2001 ISBN 0415260361 pages 96-100
  15. ^ a b The Birth of Jesus According to the Gospels by Joseph F. Kelly 2008 ISBN pages 41-49
  16. ^ Mercer dictionary of the Bible by Watson E. Mills, Roger Aubrey Bullard 1998 ISBN 0865543739 page 556
  17. ^ Jesus and the Gospels by Clive Marsh, Steve Moyise 2006 ISBN 0567040739 page 37
  18. ^ The Gospel according to Matthew by Leon Morris ISBN 0851113389 page 26
  19. ^ a b c The people's New Testament commentary by M. Eugene Boring, Fred B. Craddock 2004 ISBN 0664227546 page 177
  20. ^ a b An Introduction to the Bible by Robert Kugler, Patrick Hartin ISBN 080284636X page 394
  21. ^ Luke by Robert A. Stein, Robert H. Stein 1993 ISBN 0805401245 page 103
  22. ^ Recovering Jesus Thomas R. Yoder Neufeld 2007 ISBN 1587432021 pages 113-114
  23. ^ Luke 1:31–38.
  24. ^ Luke 2:1–7.
  25. ^ Luke 2:10–14.
  26. ^ Luke 2:16–20.
  27. ^ Luke 2:22.
  28. ^ Luke 2:39.
  29. ^ 1:26–27
  30. ^ 1:26–38
  31. ^ 1:39–56
  32. ^ 2:1–7
  33. ^ 2:8–15
  34. ^ 2:16–20
  35. ^ 2:21–38
  36. ^ 2:39–40
  37. ^ Matthew 1:21
  38. ^ a b c Bible explorer's guide by John Phillips 2002 ISBN 0825434831 page 147
  39. ^ a b c Matthew by Thomas G. Long 1997 ISBN 0664252575 pages 14-15
  40. ^ a b The Gospel of Matthew by Rudolf Schnackenburg 2002 ISBN 0802844383 page 9
  41. ^ Matthew 1:19–20
  42. ^ Matthew by Charles H. Talbert 2010 ISBN 0801031923 page 29
  43. ^ Matthew 1:21
  44. ^ All the Doctrines of the Bible by Herbert Lockyer 1988 ISBN 0310280516 page 159
  45. ^ The Westminster theological wordbook of the Bible 2003 by Donald E. Gowan ISBN 066422394X page 453
  46. ^ Matthew 1:22–23
  47. ^ Matthew by David L. Turner 2008 ISBN 0801026849 page 68
  48. ^ Isiah 7:14Template:Bibleverse with invalid book
  49. ^ Brown, Raymond Edward (1988). An Adult Christ at Christmas: Essays on the Three Biblical Christmas Stories. Collegeville, Minn.: Liturgical Press. p. 11. ISBN 0-8146-0997-X. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  50. ^ Freedman, David; Myers, Allen C.; Beck, Astrid B. (2000). Eerdman's Dictionary of the Bible. Grand Rapids, MI.: Eerdmans. p. 844. ISBN 0-8028-2400-5. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  51. ^ Matthew 2:1–4.
  52. ^ Micah 5:2–4
  53. ^ The New Testament by Bart D. Ehrman 1999 ISBN 0195126394 page 109
  54. ^ Matthew 2:23.
  55. ^ Brown, Raymond Edward (1999-05-18). The Birth of the Messiah: A Commentary on the Infancy Narratives in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke (The Anchor Yale Bible Reference Library). Yale University Press. p. 36. ISBN 0-300-14008-8.
  56. ^ Crossan, John Dominic; Watts, Richard J. (1999). Who Is Jesus?: Answers to Your Questions About the Historical Jesus. Louisville, Ky.: Westminster John Knox Press. pp. 11–12. ISBN 0-664-25842-5. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  57. ^ "Robert J. Miller, 2003 Needs page number.
  58. ^ Bruce M. Metzger, Michael D. Coogan, The Oxford Guide to People & Places of the Bible. Oxford University Press US, 2004. p. 137
  59. ^ Mark D. Roberts Can We Trust the Gospels?: Investigating the Reliability of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John Good News Publishers, 2007 page 102
  60. ^ a b Steven L. Cox, Kendell H Easley, 2007 Harmony of the Gospels ISBN 0-8054-9444-8 pages 289-290
  61. ^ Funk, Robert W. and the Jesus Seminar. The acts of Jesus: the search for the authentic deeds of Jesus. HarperSanFrancisco. 1998. "Birth & Infancy Stories" p. 497-526.
  62. ^ "Jesus Christ." Cross, F. L., ed. The Oxford dictionary of the Christian church. New York: Oxford University Press. 2005
  63. ^ a b Helmut Köster, "Ancient Christian gospels: their history and development", Continuum International Publishing Group, (2004). pgs.307-308
  64. ^ Antiquities 18.1-2 (18.1.1).
  65. ^ Raymond Brown, An Adult Christ at Christmas: Essays on the Three Biblical Christmas Stories, (Liturgical Press, 1988), p. 17: "most critical scholars acknowledge a confusion and misdating on Luke's part."
    For example, Dunn, James Douglas Grant (2003), Jesus Remembered, Eerdmans. p. 344. ISBN 0-8028-3931-2 Similarly, Erich S. Gruen, 'The expansion of the empire under Augustus', in The Cambridge ancient history Volume 10, p. 157.
    Geza Vermes, The Nativity, Penguin 2006, p. 96.
    W. D. Davies and E. P. Sanders, 'Jesus from the Jewish point of view', in The Cambridge History of Judaism ed William Horbury, vol 3: the Early Roman Period, 1984
    Anthony Harvey, A Companion to the New Testament (Cambridge University Press 2004), p221.
    Meier, John P., A Marginal Jew: Rethinking the Historical Jesus. Doubleday, 1991, v. 1, p. 213.
    Brown, Raymond E. The Birth of the Messiah: A Commentary on the Infancy Narratives in Matthew and Luke. London: G. Chapman, 1977, p. 554.
    A. N. Sherwin-White, pp. 166, 167.
    Fergus Millar Millar, Fergus (1990). "Reflections on the trials of Jesus". A Tribute to Geza Vermes: Essays on Jewish and Christian Literature and History (JSOT Suppl. 100) [eds. P.R. Davies and R.T. White]. Sheffield: JSOT Press. pp. 355–81. {{cite conference}}: Unknown parameter |booktitle= ignored (|book-title= suggested) (help) repr. in Millar, Fergus (2006), "The Greek World, the Jews, and the East", Rome, the Greek World and the East, 3, University of North Carolina Press: 139–163
  66. ^ Archer, Gleason Leonard (1982). Encyclopedia of Bible Difficulties. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Zondervan Pub. House. p. 366. ISBN 0-310-43570-6. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  67. ^ Frederick Fyvie Bruce, The New Testament Documents: Are They Reliable? (1943; republished Eerdman, 2003), page 87-88.
  68. ^ Nikos Kokkinos, 1998, in Chronos, kairos, Christos 2 by Ray Summers, Jerry Vardaman ISBN 0865545820 pages 121-126
  69. ^ C.F. Evans, Tertullian's reference to Sentius Saturninus and the Lukan Census in the Journal of Theological Studies (1973) XXIV(1): 24-39
  70. ^ The Life of Jesus of Nazareth by Rush Rhees 2007 ISBN 1406838489 Section 54
  71. ^ Matthew 2:1.
  72. ^ Luke 2:4.
  73. ^ Virgin Birth of Chris by J Gresham Machen 1987 ISBN 0227676300 page 193
  74. ^ Jesus and the Gospels by Clive Marsh, Steve Moyise 2006 ISBN 0567040739 page 37
  75. ^ Brown, Raymond Edward (1977). The Birth of the Messiah: A Commentary on the Infancy Narratives in Matthew and Luke. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday. p. 401. ISBN 0-385-05907-8.
  76. ^ Witherington, Ben (2007-12-09). "No Inn in the Room: a Christmas Sermon on Lk 2.1-7".
  77. ^ Wright, Tom (2004). Luke for Everyone. London: Westminster John Knox Press. p. 39. ISBN 0-664-22784-8. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  78. ^ Vermes, Géza (2006-11-02). The Nativity: History and Legend. Penguin Books Ltd. p. 22. ISBN 0-14-102446-1.
  79. ^ Sanders, Ed Parish (1993). The Historical Figure of Jesus. London: Allen Lane. p. 85. ISBN 0-7139-9059-7.
  80. ^ Hurtado, Larry W. (2003). Lord Jesus Christ: Devotion to Jesus in Earliest Christianity. Grand Rapids, Mich.: W.B. Eerdmans. pp. 319–320. ISBN 0-8028-6070-2. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  81. ^ Brown, Raymond Edward (1977). The Birth of the Messiah: A Commentary on the Infancy Narratives in Matthew and Luke. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday. pp. 104–121. ISBN 0-385-05907-8.
  82. ^ Taylor, Joan E. (1993). Christians and the Holy Places: The Myth of Jewish-Christian Origins. Oxford: Clarendon Press. pp. 99–102. ISBN 0-19-814785-6.
  83. ^ Protoevangelium 18; Justin Martyr, Dialogue with Trypho; cf. Origen, Contra Celsum 1.2.
  84. ^ Taylor, Joan E. (1993). Christians and the Holy Places: The Myth of Jewish-Christian Origins. Oxford: Clarendon Press. pp. 99–100. ISBN 0-19-814785-6.
  85. ^ Eerdmans Dictionary of the Bible 2000 ISBN 9053565035 page 173
  86. ^ The Everything Jesus Book by Jon Kennedy 2006 ISBN 1593377126 page 20
  87. ^ What You Need to Know about Islam and Muslims by George W. Braswell 2000 ISBN 0805418296 page 108
  88. ^ Islam and the destiny of man by Gai Eaton 1986 ISBN 088706163X page 108
  89. ^ Quran: the final testament by Rashad Khalifa 2001 ISBN 1881893057 page
  90. ^ Josephus and the New Testament by Steve Mason 2003 ISBN 156563795X page 160
  91. ^ Paul L. Maier, Herod and the Infants of Bethlehem in Chronos, kairos, Christos 2 by Ray Summers, Jerry Vardaman ISBN 0865545820 pp. 169-179
  92. ^ Aland, Barbara; Aland, Kurt; Martini, Carlo M.; Karavidopoulos, Johannes; Metzger, Bruce M. (1983). Novum Testamentum Graece Et Latine—Greek/Latin New Testament. American Bible Society. p. 5. ISBN 3-438-05401-9. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  93. ^ Menken, Maarten J. J. "The Sources of the Old Testament Quotation in Matthew 2:23" Journal of Biblical Literature120:3 (451-68), 467-8.
  94. ^ Smith, Gary (2007-08-30). The New American Commentary: Isaiah 1-33, Vol. 15A (New American Commentary). B&H Publishing Group. p. 268. ISBN 0-8054-0115-6.
  95. ^ a b John, and Muddiman, John, "The Oxford Bible Commentary", (Oxford University Press, 2001) p.850
  96. ^ Oxford Biblical Studies ONline: Nazoreans
  97. ^ Ulrich luz, the Theology of the Gospel of Matthew, Cambridge University Press, p.18
  98. ^ Matthew 1:23 (cf. Isaiah 7:14).
  99. ^ See Aland, op.cit., p.3.
  100. ^ Brown, Raymond E.; Achtemeier, Paul J. (1978). Mary in the New Testament: A Collaborative Assessment by Protestant and Roman Catholic Scholars. Paulist Press. p. 92. ISBN 0-8091-2168-9.
  101. ^ a b Church dogmatics, Volume 4, Part 1 by Karl Barth, Geoffrey William Bromiley, Thomas Forsyth Torrance 2004 ISBN 0567051293 pages 256-259
  102. ^ a b An introduction to the early history of Christian doctrine by James Franklin Bethune-Baker 2005 ISBN 1402157703 page 334
  103. ^ a b A History of the Christian Church by Williston Walker 2010 ISBN 1440044465 pages 65-66
  104. ^ The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia by Geoffrey W. Bromiley 1988 ISBN 0802837859 page
  105. ^ An introductory dictionary of theology and religious studies by Orlando O. Espín, James B. Nickoloff 2007 ISBN 0814658563 page 238
  106. ^ Mercer dictionary of the Bible by Watson E. Mills, Roger Aubrey Bullard 1998 ISBN 0865543739 page 712
  107. ^ Basic Theology: by Charles Caldwell Ryrie 1999 ISBN 0802427340 page 275
  108. ^ a b c Systematic Theology, Volume 2 by Wolfhart Pannenberg 2004 0567084663 ISBN pages 297-303
  109. ^ An exposition of the epistle of Saint Paul to the Philippians by Jean Daille 1995 ISBN 0802825117 pages 194-195
  110. ^ Christ in Christian Tradition: From the Apostolic Age to Chalcedon by Aloys Grillmeier, John Bowden 1975 ISBN 066422301X pages 15-19
  111. ^ The Witness of Jesus, Paul and John: An Exploration in Biblical Theology by Larry R. Helyer 2008 ISBN 0830828885 page 282
  112. ^ Encyclopedia of theology: a concise Sacramentum mundi by Karl Rahner 2004 ISBN 0860120066 pages 474 and 1434
  113. ^ Burke, Raymond L.; et al. (2008). Mariology: A Guide for Priests, Deacons, Seminarians, and Consecrated Persons ISBN 9781579183554 pages 613-614
  114. ^ The Early Christian World, Volumes 1-2 by Philip Francis Esler 2004 ISBN 0415333121 page 452
  115. ^ Handbook to life in the medieval world, Volume 1 by Madeleine Pelner Cosman, Linda Gale Jones 2008 ISBN 0816048878 page 329
  116. ^ a b Orthodox readings of Augustine by George E. Demacopoulos, Aristotle Papanikolaou 2008 ISBN 0881413275 pages 92-96
  117. ^ The theology of John Calvin by Charles Partee 2008 ISBN 0664231195 page 159
  118. ^ a b Toward the origins of Christmas by Susan K. Roll 1995 ISBN 9039005311 pages 208-211
  119. ^ McGrath, Alister E. (2007), Christian theology : an introduction, Malden, Mass.: Blackwell, p. 282, ISBN 1405153601
  120. ^ Ehrman, Bart D. (1993), The Orthodox corruption of scripture: the effect of early Christological controversies on the text of the New Testament, New York: Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-510279-6
  121. ^ Mary and the Saints by James P. Campbell 2005 0829417257 pages 17-20
  122. ^ Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, 2nd series, Vol XIV p207, translated edition by H.R. Percival. http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/basis/ephesus.html
  123. ^ The Seven Ecumenical Councils of the Undivided Church, trans H. R. Percival, in Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, 2nd Series, ed. P. Schaff and H. Wace, (repr. Grand Rapids MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 1955), XIV, pp. 192-242
  124. ^ The acts of the Council of Chalcedon by Council of Chalcedon, Richard Price, Michael Gaddis 2006 ISBN 0853230390 pages 1-5
  125. ^ The creed: the apostolic faith in contemporary theology by Berard L. Marthaler 2007 ISBN 0896225372 page 114
  126. ^ Essential theological terms by Justo L. González 2005 ISBN 0664228100 page 120
  127. ^ Doctrine and practice in the early church by Stuart George Hall 1992 ISBN 0802806295 pages 211-218
  128. ^ a b Leo the Great by Pope Leo I, Bronwen Neil 2009 ISBN 0415394805 pages 61-62
  129. ^ Summa Theologica, Volume 4 (Part III, First Section) bySt Thomas Aquinas 207 Cosimo Classics ISBN 1602065608 pages 2197-2211
  130. ^ a b Aquinas on doctrine: a critical introduction by Thomas Gerard Weinandy, John Yocum 2004 ISBN 0567084116 page 98
  131. ^ Calvin's Catholic Christology by E. David Willis 1966 Published by E.J. Brill, Netherlands, page 83
  132. ^ An introductory dictionary of theology and religious studies by Orlando O. Espín, James B. Nickoloff 2007 ISBN 0814658563 page 237
  133. ^ The journey of the Magi: meanings in history of a Christian story by Richard C. Trexler 1997 ISBN 0691011265 page 9
  134. ^ Christian worship in Reformed Churches past and present by Lukas Vischer 2002 ISBN 0802805205 pages 400-401
  135. ^ a b c d Aspects of the liturgical year in Cappadocia (325-430) by Jill Burnett Comings 2005 ISBN 0820474649 pages 61-71
  136. ^ Faith & philosophy of Christianity by Maya George 2009 ISBN 8178357208 page 287
  137. ^ Sacred Christmas Music by Ronald M. Clancy 2008 ISBN 1402758111 pages 15-19
  138. ^ The Feast of Christmas by Joseph F. Kelly 2010 ISBN 0814633250 pages 331-391
  139. ^ Pastor and laity in the theology of Jean Gerson by Dorothy Catherine Brown 1987 ISBN 0521330297 page 32
  140. ^ The Feast of Christmas by Joseph F. Kelly 2010 ISBN 0814633250 pages 112-114
  141. ^ a b c Mercer dictionary of the Bible by Watson E. Mills, Roger Aubrey Bullard 1998 ISBN 0865543739 pages 520-525
  142. ^ Lord Jesus Christ: Devotion to Jesus in Earliest Christianity by Larry W. Hurtado 2005 ISBN 0802831672 pages 113 and 179
  143. ^ II Corinthians: a commentary by Frank J. Matera 2003 ISBN 0664221173 pages 11-13
  144. ^ Christology: Biblical And Historical by Mini S. Johnson ISBN page 211
  145. ^ Christology: Biblical And Historical by Mini S. Johnson, 2005 ISBN 81-8324-007-0 pages 74-76
  146. ^ La vida sacra: contemporary Hispanic sacramental theology by James L. Empereur, Eduardo Fernández 2006 ISBN 0742551571 pages 3-5
  147. ^ Philippines by Lily Rose R. Tope, Detch P. Nonan-Mercado 2005 ISBN 0761414754 page 109
  148. ^ Christology: Key Readings in Christian Thought by Jeff Astley, David Brown, Ann Loades 2009 ISBN 0664232698 page 106
  149. ^ Williams, Rowan Ponder these things 2002 ISBN 185311362X page 7
  150. ^ An Introduction to the Bible by Robert Kugler, Patrick Hartin ISBN 080284636X page 394
  151. ^ Mercer dictionary of the Bible by Watson E. Mills, Roger Aubrey Bullard 1998 ISBN 0865543739 page 396
  152. ^ Sanctity of time and space in tradition and modernity by Alberdina Houtman, Marcel Poorthuis, Joshua Schwartz 1998 ISBN 9004112332 pages 61-62
  153. ^ a b The History and Use of Hymns and Hymn-Tunes by David R Breed 2009 ISBN 1110471866 page 17
  154. ^ a b Favourite Hymns by Marjorie Reeves 2006 ISBN 0826480977 page 3-5
  155. ^ All the music of the Bible by Herbert Lockyer 2004 ISBN 1565635310 page 120
  156. ^ Music of the Middle Ages, Volume 1 by Giulio Cattin, F. Alberto Gallo 1985 ISBN 0521284899 page 2
  157. ^ a b The Feast of Christmas by Joseph F. Kelly 2010 ISBN 0814633250 pages 22-31
  158. ^ Renaissance art: a topical dictionary by Irene Earls 1987 ISBN 0313246580 page 174
  159. ^ The mystical language of icons by Solrunn Nes 2005 ISBN 0802829163 page 43
  160. ^ a b The meaning of icons by Leonide Ouspensky, Vladimir Lossky 1999 ISBN 091383677X page 157
  161. ^ Church Fathers and Teachers: From Saint Leo the Great to Peter Lombard by Pope Benedict XVI 2010 ISBN 1586173170 page 32
  162. ^ Wellesz, Egon (1947). "The Nativity Drama of the Byzantine Church". Journal of Roman Studies. 37. Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies: 145–151. doi:10.2307/298465.
  163. ^ Miles, Clement, Christmas customs and traditions, Dover 1976, ISBN 0-486-23354-5, pages 31-37
  164. ^ Miles, Clement, Christmas customs and traditions, Dover 1976, ISBN 0-486-23354-5, pages 47–48
  165. ^ a b c Jesus in history, thought, and culture: an encyclopedia, Volume 1 by James Leslie Houlden 2003 ISBN 1576078566 page 631-635

Further reading

  • Albright, W.F. and C.S. Mann. "Matthew." The Anchor Bible Series. New York: Doubleday & Company, 1971.
  • Brown, Raymond E. The Birth of the Messiah: A Commentary on the Infancy Narratives in Matthew and Luke. London: G. Chapman, 1977.
  • Calkins, Robert G. Illuminated Books of the Middle Ages. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 1983.
  • Carter, Warren. Matthew and Empire. Harrisburg: Trinity Press International, 2001.
  • France, R.T. The Gospel According to Matthew: an Introduction and Commentary. Leicester: Inter-Varsity, 1985.
  • Gundry, Robert H. Matthew a Commentary on his Literary and Theological Art. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1982.
  • Gundry, Robert H. "Salvation in Matthew." Society of Biblical Literature - 2000 Seminar Papers. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2000.
  • Hill, David. The Gospel of Matthew. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1981
  • Jones, Alexander. The Gospel According to St. Matthew. London: Geoffrey Chapman, 1965.
  • Levine, Amy-Jill. "Matthew." Women's Bible Commentary. Carol A. Newsom and Sharon H. Ringe, eds. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 1998.
  • Schaberg, Jane. Illegitimacy of Jesus: A Feminist Theological Interpretation of the Infancy Narratives (Biblical Seminar Series, No 28) Sheffield Academic Press (March 1995) ISBN 1-85075-533-7
  • Schweizer, Eduard. The Good News According to Matthew. Atlanta: John Knox Press, 1975
  • Vermes, Geza "The Nativity: History and Legend". Penguin (2006) ISBN 0-14-102446-1

External links

Birth of Jesus: The Nativity
Life of Jesus: The Nativity
Preceded by
Mary visits Elizabeth
   New Testament   
Events
Followed by
Annunciation to the Shepherds

Template:Link FA

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nativity_of_Jesus&oldid=410454097"