Jump to content

Renewable energy: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Wind power: moving discussion of birds and bats to appropriate section
→‎Wind farms: adding to discussion of environmental considerations and wind farms
Line 338: Line 338:
*In substituting for base-load coal power, wind power produces a net decrease in greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution, and a net increase in biodiversity.
*In substituting for base-load coal power, wind power produces a net decrease in greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution, and a net increase in biodiversity.
*Modern wind turbines are almost silent and rotate so slowly (in terms of revolutions per minute) that they are rarely a hazard to birds.<ref>[http://www.sustainabilitycentre.com.au/WindPowersStrength.pdf Why Australia needs wind power]</ref>
*Modern wind turbines are almost silent and rotate so slowly (in terms of revolutions per minute) that they are rarely a hazard to birds.<ref>[http://www.sustainabilitycentre.com.au/WindPowersStrength.pdf Why Australia needs wind power]</ref>

Studies of birds and offshore wind farms in Europe have found that there are very few bird collisions.<ref>newscientist.com June 2005 [http://www.newscientist.com/channel/life/mg18625045.500 Wind turbines a breeze for migrating birds]</ref> Several offshore wind sites in Europe have been in areas heavily used by seabirds. Improvements in wind turbine design, including a much slower rate of rotation of the blades and a smooth tower base instead of perchable lattice towers, have helped reduce bird mortality at wind farms around the world. However older smaller wind turbines may be hazardous to flying birds.{{Fact|date=May 2007}} Birds are severely impacted by fossil fuel energy; examples include birds dying from exposure to oil spills, habitat loss from acid rain and mountaintop removal coal mining, and mercury poisoning.<ref>http://www.capewind.org/FAQ-Category8-Cape+Wind+and+the+Environment-Parent0-myfaq-yes.htm#43</ref>


=== Longevity issues===
=== Longevity issues===

Revision as of 11:54, 17 June 2007

World renewable energy in 2005 (except 2004 data for items marked* or **). Enlarge image to read exclusions.

Renewable Energy is energy derived from resources that are regenerative or for all practical purposes cannot be depleted.[1] For this reason, renewable energy sources are fundamentally different from fossil fuels, and do not produce as many greenhouse gases and other pollutants as fossil fuel combustion. Mankind's traditional uses of wind, water, and solar energy are widespread in developed and developing countries; but the mass production of electricity using renewable energy sources has become more commonplace recently, reflecting the major threats of climate change, exhaustion of fossil fuels, and the environmental, social and political risks of fossil fuels and nuclear power. Consequently, many countries promote renewable energies through tax incentives and subsidies.

Renewable energy accounts for about 14% of the world's energy consumption, but the technical potential is large enough to cover many times current and several times projected energy consumption in 2100 (see below). Renewable technologies such as geothermal and hydropower are often economically competitive without subsidies. Other technologies such as solar power are substantially more expensive, although future costs may decline to a fraction of current levels.

Main renewable energy technologies

Three energy sources

Renewable energy flows involve natural phenomena such as sunlight, wind, tides and geothermal heat. Each of these sources has unique characteristics which influence how and where they are used.

The majority of renewable energy technologies are directly or indirectly powered by the Sun. The Earth-Atmosphere system is in equilibrium such that heat radiation into space is equal to incoming solar radiation, the resulting level of energy within the Earth-Atmosphere system can roughly be described as the Earth's "climate." The hydrosphere (water) absorbs a major fraction of the incoming radiation. Most radiation is absorbed at low latitudes around the equator, but this energy is dissipated around the globe in the form of winds and ocean currents. Wave motion may play a role in the process of transferring mechanical energy between the atmosphere and the ocean through wind stress.[2] Solar energy is also responsible for the distribution of precipitation which is tapped by hydroelectric projects, and for the growth of plants used to create biofuels.

Wind power

Offshore wind turbines near Copenhagen

Airflows can be used to run wind turbines and some are capable of producing 5 MW of power. Turbines with rated output of 1.5-3 MW have become the most common for commercial use. The power output of a turbine is a function of the cube of the wind speed, so as wind speed increases, power output increases dramatically.[3] Areas where winds are stronger and more constant, such as offshore and high altitude sites, are preferred locations for wind farms.

Wind power is the fastest growing of the renewable energy technologies. Over the past decade, global installed maximum capacity increased from 2,500 MW in 1992 to just over 40,000 MW at the end of 2003, at an annual growth rate of near 30%.[3] Due to the intermittency of wind resources, most deployed turbines in the EU produce electricity an average of 25% of their rated maximum power (a load factor of 25%),[4] but under favourable wind regimes some reach 35% or higher. The load factor is generally higher in winter. It would mean that a typical 5 MW turbine in the EU would have an average output of 1.7 MW.

Globally, the long-term technical potential of wind energy is believed to be five times current production global energy consumption or 40 times current electricity demand. This could require large amounts of land to be utilized for wind turbines, particularly in areas of higher wind resources. Offshore resources experience mean wind speeds of ~90% greater than that of land, so offshore resources could contribute substantially more energy.[5] This number could also increase with higher altitude ground-based or airborne wind turbines.[6]

Wind strengths near the Earth's surface vary and thus cannot guarantee continuous power unless combined with other energy sources or storage systems. Some estimates suggest that 1,000 MW of conventional wind generation capacity can be relied on for just 333 MW of continuous power. While this might change as technology evolves, advocates have suggested incorporating wind power with other power sources, or the use of energy storage techniques, with this in mind. It is best used in the context of a system that has significant reserve capacity such as hydro, or reserve load, such as a desalination plant, to mitigate the economic effects of resource variability.

Wind power is renewable and produces no greenhouse gases during operation, such as carbon dioxide and methane.

Water power

Energy in water (in the form of motive energy or temperature differences) can be harnessed and used. Since water is about a thousand times denser than air, even a slow flowing stream of water, or moderate sea swell, can yield considerable amounts of energy.

There are many forms of water energy:

  • Hydroelectric energy is a term usually reserved for large-scale hydroelectric dams.
  • Micro hydro systems are hydroelectric power installations that typically produce up to 100 kW of power. They are often used in water rich areas as a Remote Area Power Supply (RAPS). There are many of these installations around the world, including several delivering around 50 kW in the Solomon Islands.
  • Wave power uses the energy in waves. The waves will usually make large pontoons go up and down in the water, leaving an area with reduced wave height in the "shadow". Wave power has now reached commercialization.
  • Tidal power captures energy from the tides in a vertical direction. Tides come in, raise water levels in a basin, and tides roll out. Around low tide, the water in the basin is discharged through a turbine.
  • Tidal stream power captures energy from the flow of tides, usually using underwater plant resembling a small wind turbine. Tidal stream power demonstration projects exist, but large scale development requires additional capital.
  • Ocean thermal energy conversion (OTEC) uses the temperature difference between the warmer surface of the ocean and the colder lower recesses. To this end, it employs a cyclic heat engine. OTEC has not been field-tested on a large scale.
  • Deep lake water cooling, although not technically an energy generation method, can save a lot of energy in summer. It uses submerged pipes as a heat sink for climate control systems. Lake-bottom water is a year-round local constant of about 4 °C.
  • Blue energy is the reverse of desalination. This form of energy is in research.

Solar energy use

File:Bp-solarmodul.JPG
A photovoltaic (PV) module that is composed of multiple PV cells. Two or more interconnected PV modules create an array.

In this context, "solar energy" refers to energy that is collected from sunlight. Solar energy can be applied in many ways, including to:

Biofuel

Plants use photosynthesis to grow and produce biomass. Also known as biomatter, biomass can be used directly as fuel or to produce liquid biofuel. Agriculturally produced biomass fuels, such as biodiesel, ethanol and bagasse (often a by-product of sugar cane cultivation) can be burned in internal combustion engines or boilers. Typically biofuel is burned to release its stored chemical energy. Research into more efficient methods of converting biofuels and other fuels into electricity utilizing fuel cells is an area of very active work.

Liquid biofuel

Information on pump, California.

Liquid biofuel is usually either a bioalcohol such as ethanol or a bio-oil such as biodiesel and straight vegetable oil. Biodiesel can be used in modern diesel vehicles with little or no modification to the engine and can be made from waste and virgin vegetable and animal oil and fats (lipids). Virgin vegetable oils can be used in modified diesel engines. In fact the Diesel engine was originally designed to run on vegetable oil rather than fossil fuel. A major benefit of biodiesel is lower emissions. The use of biodiesel reduces emission of carbon monoxide and other hydrocarbons by 20 to 40%. In some areas corn, cornstalks, sugarbeets, sugar cane, and switchgrasses are grown specifically to produce ethanol (also known as grain alcohol) a liquid which can be used in internal combustion engines and fuel cells. Ethanol is being phased into the current energy infrastructure. E85 is a fuel composed of 85% ethanol and 15% gasoline that is sold to consumers. Biobutanol is being developed as an alternative to bioethanol.

In the future, there might be bio-synthetic liquid fuel available. It can be produced by the Fischer-Tropsch process, also called Biomass-To-Liquids (BTL).[7]

Solid biomass

Sugar cane residue can be used as a biofuel

Direct use is usually in the form of combustible solids, either wood, the biogenic portion of municipal solid waste or combustible field crops. Field crops may be grown specifically for combustion or may be used for other purposes, and the processed plant waste then used for combustion. Most sorts of biomatter, including dried manure, can actually be burnt to heat water and to drive turbines.

Sugar cane residue, wheat chaff, corn cobs and other plant matter can be, and is, burnt quite successfully. The net Carbon Dioxide emissions that are added to the atmosphere by this process are only from the fossil fuel that is consumed to plant, fertilize, harvest and transport the biomass. Processes to grow perenials such as switchgrass, miscanthus, and willow, field pelletize and co-fire with coal for electricity generation are being studied and appear to be economically viable.[8] Co-firing this cellulosic biomass with coal to make electricity is more effective for reducing carbon dioxide emmissions to the atmosphere than using it to make ethanol.

Solid biomass can also be gasified, and used as described in the next section.

Biogas

Biogas can easily be produced from current waste streams, such as: paper production, sugar production, sewage, animal waste and so forth. These various waste streams have to be slurried together and allowed to naturally ferment, producing methane gas. This can be done by converting current sewage plants into biogas plants. When a biogas plant has extracted all the methane it can, the remains are sometimes better suitable as fertilizer than the original biomass.

Alternatively biogas can be produced via advanced waste processing systems such as mechanical biological treatment. These systems recover the recyclable elements of household waste and process the biodegradable fraction in anaerobic digesters.

Renewable natural gas is a biogas which has been upgraded to a quality similar to natural gas. By upgrading the quality to that of natural gas, it becomes possible to distribute the gas to the mass market via gas grid.

Geothermal energy

Krafla Geothermal Station in northeast Iceland

Geothermal energy is energy obtained by tapping the heat of the earth itself, usually from kilometers deep into the Earth's crust. It is expensive to build a power station but operating costs are low resulting in low energy costs for suitable sites. Ultimately, this energy derives from the radioactive decay in the core of the Earth, which heats the Earth from the inside out.

Three types of power plants are used to generate power from geothermal energy: dry steam, flash, and binary. Dry steam plants take steam out of fractures in the ground and use it to directly drive a turbine that spins a generator. Flash plants take hot water, usually at temperatures over 200 °C, out of the ground, and allows it to boil as it rises to the surface then separates the steam phase in steam/water separators and then runs the steam through a turbine. In binary plants, the hot water flows through heat exchangers, boiling an organic fluid that spins the turbine. The condensed steam and remaining geothermal fluid from all three types of plants are injected back into the hot rock to pick up more heat.

Although geothermal sites are capable of providing heat for many decades, eventually they are depleted as the ground cools. The government of Iceland states It should be stressed that the geothermal resource is not strictly renewable in the same sense as the hydro resource. It estimates that Iceland's geothermal energy could provide 1700 MW for over 100 years, compared to the current production of 140 MW.[9]

The geothermal energy from the core of the Earth is closer to the surface in some areas than in others. Where hot underground steam or water can be tapped and brought to the surface it may be used to generate electricity. Such geothermal power sources exist in certain geologically unstable parts of the world such as Iceland, New Zealand, United States, the Philippines and Italy. The two most prominent areas for this in the United States are in the Yellowstone basin and in northern California. Iceland produced 170 MW geothermal power and heated 86% of all houses in the year 2000 through geothermal energy. Some 8000 MW of capacity is operational in total.

There is also the potential to generate geothermal energy from Hot Dry Rocks. Holes at least 3km deep are drilled into the earth. Some of these holes pump water into the earth, while other holes pump hot water out. The heat resource consists of hot underground radiogenic granite rocks, which heat up when there is enough sediment between the rock and the earths surface. Several companies in Australia are exploring this technology.

Potential

While currently renewable energy sources only supply a modest fraction of current energy use (ca. 14% of primary energy use[10], mostly from traditional biomass), there is much potential that could be exploited in the future. As the table below illustrates, the technical potential of renewable energy sources is more than 18 times current global primary energy use and furthermore several times higher than projected energy use in 2100.

A laundromat in California with flat-plate solar water heating collectors on its roof.
The Renewable Energy Resource Base (Exajoules a year)
Current use (2001) Technical potential Theoretical potential
Hydropower 9 50 147
Biomass energy 50 >276 2,900
Solar energy 0.1 >1,575 3,900,000
Wind energy 0.12 640 6,000
Geothermal energy 0.6 5,000 140,000,000
Ocean energy not estimated not estimated 7,400
Total 60 >7,600 >144,000,000
Current use is in primary energy equivalent.
For comparison, the current global primary energy use (2001) is 402 Exajoules a year.
Source: World Energy Assessment 2001[10].

There are many different ways to assess potentials. The theoretical potential indicates the amount of energy theoretically available for energy purposes, such as, in the case of solar power, the amount of incoming radiation at the earth's surface. The technical potential is a more practical estimate of how much could be put to human use by considering conversion efficiencies of the available technology and available land area. To give an idea of the constraints, the estimate for solar energy assumes that 1% of the world's unused land surface is used for solar power.

The technical potentials generally do not include economic or other environmental constraints, and the potentials that could be realized at an economically competitive level under current conditions and in a short time-frame is lower still. It should also be noted that intermittent sources such as wind, solar, tidal, and wave energy may eventually require energy storage and/or back-up to guarantee reliable supply at large penetrations.

Renewable energy commercialization

Costs

Renewable energy technologies encompass a broad, diverse array of technologies, and the current status of these different technologies varies considerably. Some technologies are already mature and economically competitive (e.g. geothermal and hydropower), other technologies need additional development steps to become competitive without subsidies.

The table shows an overview of costs of various renewable energy technologies. For comparison with the prices in the table, electricity production from a conventional coal-fired plant costs about 4¢/kWh[11]. Achieving further cost reductions as indicated in the table below requires further technology development, market deployment, and an increase in production capacities to mass production levels.[12]

2001 energy costs Potential future energy cost
Electricity
Wind 4-8 ¢/kWh 3-10 ¢/kWh
Solar photovoltaic 25-160 ¢/kWh 5-25 ¢/kWh
Solar thermal 12-34 ¢/kWh 4-20 ¢/kWh
Large hydropower 2-10 ¢/kWh 2-10 ¢/kWh
Small hydropower 2-12 ¢/kWh 2-10 ¢/kWh
Geothermal 2-10 ¢/kWh 1-8 ¢/kWh
Biomass 3-12 ¢/kWh 4-10 ¢/kWh
Heat
Geothermal heat 0.5-5 ¢/kWh 0.5-5 ¢/kWh
Biomass - heat 1-6 ¢/kWh 1-5 ¢/kWh
Low temp solar heat 2-25 ¢/kWh 2-10 ¢/kWh
All costs are in 2001 $-cent per kilowatt-hour.
Source: World Energy Assessment, 2004 update[12]

Wind power market grows

Wind power: worldwide installed capacity and prediction 1997-2010, Source: WWEA

Figures from the Global Wind Energy Council (GWEC) show that 2006 recorded an increase in installed wind power capacity of 15,197 megawatts (MW), taking the total installed capacity to 74,223 MW, up from 59,091 MW in 2005.[13]

Despite constraints facing supply chains for wind turbines, the annual market for wind continued to increase at the rate of 32% following the 2005 record year, in which the market grew by 41%.[14]

In terms of economic value, the wind energy sector has become one of the important players in the energy markets, with the total value of new generating equipment installed in 2006 reaching €18 billion, or US$23 billion.[15]

The countries with the highest total installed capacity are Germany (20,621 MW), Spain (11,615 MW), the USA (11,603 MW), India (6,270 MW) and Denmark (3,136).[16] In terms of new installed capacity in 2006, the USA lead with 2,454 MW, followed by Germany (2,233 MW), India (1,840 MW), Spain (1,587 MW), China (1,347 MW) and France (810 MW).[17]

In the UK, a licence to build the world's largest offshore windfarm, in the Thames estuary, has been granted. The London Array windfarm, 12 miles off Kent and Essex, should eventually consist of 341 turbines, occupying an area of 90 square miles. This is a £1.5 billion, 1,000 megawatt project, which will power one-third of London homes. The windfarm will produce an amount of energy that, if generated by conventional means, would result in 1.9 million tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions every year. It could also make up to 10% of the Government's 2010 renewables target.[18]

New generation of solar thermal plants

Solar Two, in California's Mojave desert, a concentrating solar thermal power plant.

Construction of the largest solar thermal power plant to be built in 15 years, in Boulder City, Nevada, is nearly complete.

The 64MW Nevada Solar One power plant will generate enough power to meet the electricity needs of about 40,000 households and follows in the steps of the 354MW SEGS solar thermal power plants located in California’s Mojave Desert. While California’s solar plants have generated billions of kilowatt hours of electricity for the past two decades, the Nevada Solar One plant will use new technologies to capture even more energy from the sun.[19]

The California Solar Initiative

As part of Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger's Million Solar Roofs Program, California has set a goal to create 3,000 megawatts of new, solar-produced electricity by 2017 - moving the state toward a cleaner energy future and helping lower the cost of solar systems for consumers. This is a comprehensive $2.8 billion program.[20]

The California Solar Initiative offers cash incentives on solar PV systems of up to $2.50 a watt. These incentives, combined with federal tax incentives, can cover up to 50% of the total cost of a solar panel system.[21] It should also be noted that there are many financial incentives to support the use of renewable energy in other US states.[22]

World's largest photovoltaic power plants

Construction of a 40 MW solar generation power plant is underway in the Saxon region of Germany. The Waldpolenz Solar Park will consist of some 550,000 thin-film solar modules. The direct current produced in the modules will be converted into alternating current and fed completely into the power grid. Once completed in 2009, the project will be one of the largest photovoltaic projects ever constructed. Currently the biggest PV plant in the world has an output capacity of around 12 megawatts.[23]

The CIS Tower, Manchester, England, was clad in PV panels at a cost of £5.5 million. It started feeding electricity to the national grid in November 2005.

A large photovoltaic power project has been completed in Portugal, the Serpa solar power plant is at one of the Europe's sunniest areas.[24] The 11 megawatt plant covers 150 acres and is comprised of 52,000 PV panels. The panels are raised 2 metres off the ground and the area will remain productive grazing land. The project will provide enough energy for 8,000 homes and will save an estimated 30,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions per year.[25][26]

A $420 million large-scale Solar power station in Victoria is to be the biggest and most efficient solar photovoltaic power station in the world. Australian company Solar Systems will demonstrate its unique, world leading design incorporating space technology in a 154MW solar power station connected to the national grid. The power station will have the capability to concentrate the sun by 500 times onto the solar cells for ultra high power output. The Victorian power station will generate clean electricity directly from the sun to meet the annual needs of over 45,000 homes with zero greenhouse gas emissions.[27]

However, when it comes to renewable energy systems and PV, it is not just large systems that matter. Building-integrated photovoltaics or "onsite" PV systems have the advantage of being matched to end use energy needs in terms of scale. So the energy is supplied close to where it is needed.[28]

Onsite renewable technologies

Template:Globalize/USA To promote energy efficiency and environmentally sensitive energy generation, EPA facilities in the United States are using renewable energy technologies to supplement or replace a large portion of their energy requirements at the following facilities:

  • Ada, Oklahoma (geothermal heat pump)
  • Ann Arbor, Michigan (fuel cell)
  • Chicago, Illinois, Regional Office (photovoltaic array)
  • Corvallis, Oregon (photovoltaic array)
  • Edison, New Jersey (solar water heating)
  • Gulf Breeze, Florida (solar lighting)
  • Golden, Colorado (wind power and transpired solar collector)
  • Manchester, Washington (wind power)
  • Research Triangle Park, North Carolina (photovoltaic solar panels and street lights)[29]

Use of ethanol for transportation

Brazil has one of the largest renewable energy programs in the world, involving production of ethanol fuel from sugar cane, and ethanol now provides 18 percent of the country's automotive fuel. As a result, Brazil, which years ago had to import a large share of the petroleum needed for domestic consumption, recently reached complete self-sufficiency in oil.[30] Production and use of ethanol has been stimulated through: (1) low-interest loans for the construction of ethanol distilleries; (2) guaranteed purchase of ethanol by the state-owned oil company at a reasonable price; (3) retail pricing of neat ethanol so it is competitive if not slightly favorable to the gasoline-ethanol blend; and (4) tax incentives provided during the 1980s to stimulate the purchase of neat ethanol vehicles. Guaranteed purchase and price regulation were ended some years ago, with relatively positive results. In addition to these other policies, ethanol producers in the state of Sao Paulo established a research and technology transfer center that has been effective in improving sugar cane and ethanol yields.[31]

Most cars on the road today in the U.S. can run on blends of up to 10% ethanol, and motor vehicle manufacturers already produce vehicles designed to run on much higher ethanol blends. Ford, DaimlerChrysler, and GM are among the automobile companies that sell “flexible-fuel” cars, trucks, and minivans that can use gasoline and ethanol blends ranging from pure gasoline up to 85% ethanol (E85). By mid-2006, there were approximately six million E85-compatible vehicles on U.S. roads.[32] The challenge is to expand the market for biofuels beyond the farm states where they have been most popular to date. Flex-fuel vehicles are assisting in this transition because they allow drivers to choose different fuels based on price and availability. The Energy Policy Act of 2005, which calls for 7.5 billion gallons of biofuels to be used annually by 2012, will also help to expand the market.[33]

Wave farms expand

File:Pelamis.JPG
Pelamis machine pointing into the waves: it attenuates the waves, gathering more energy than its narrow profile suggests. See Pelamis Wave Energy Converter

Portugal now has the world's first commercial wave farm, the Aguçadora Wave Park, established in 2006. The farm will initially use three Pelmis P-750 machines generating 2.25 MW.[34][35] Initial costs are put at 8,5 million euro. Subject to successful operation, a further 70 million euro is likely to be invested before 2009 on a further 28 machines to generate 525 MW.[36]

Funding for a wave farm in Scotland was announced in February, 2007 by the Scottish Executive, at a cost of over 4 million pounds, as part of a £13 million funding packages for ocean power in Scotland. The farm will be the world's largest with a capacity of 3MW generated by four Pelamis machines.[37]

Geothermal energy prospects

By the end of 2005 worldwide use of geothermal energy for electricity had reached 9.3 GWs, with an additional 28 GW used directly for heating.[38] If heat recovered by ground source heat pumps is included, the non-electric use of geothermal energy is estimated at more than 100 GWt (gigawatts of thermal power) and is used commercially in over 70 countries.[39] During 2005 contracts were placed for an additional 0.5 GW of capacity in the United States, while there were also plants under construction in 11 other countries.[40]

Criticisms and responses

Critics suggest that some renewable energy applications may create pollution, be dangerous, take up large amounts of land, or be incapable of generating a large net amount of energy. Proponents advocate the use of "appropriate renewables", also known as soft energy technologies, as these have many advantages.

Availability

There is no shortage of solar-derived energy on Earth. Indeed the storages and flows of energy on the planet are very large relative to human needs.

  • The amount of solar energy intercepted by the Earth every minute is greater than the amount of energy the world uses in fossil fuels each year.
  • Tropical oceans absorb 560 trillion gigajoules (GJ) of solar energy each year, equivalent to 1,600 times the world’s annual energy use.
  • The energy in the winds that blow across the United States each year could produce more than 16 billion GJ of electricity—more than one and one-half times the electricity consumed in the United States in 2000.
  • Annual photosynthesis by the vegetation in the United States is 50 billion GJ, equivalent to nearly 60% of the nation’s annual fossil fuel use.

Yet a recurring criticism of some renewable sources is their intermittent nature. But a variety of renewable sources in combination can overcome this problem. As Amory Lovins explains:

"Stormy weather, bad for direct solar collection, is generally good for windmills and small hydropower plants; dry, sunny weather, bad for hydropower, is ideal for photovoltaics.[41]

The challenge of variable power supply may be further alleviated by energy storage. Available storage options include pumped-storage hydro systems, batteries, hydrogen fuel cells, and thermal mass. Initial investments in such energy storage systems can be high, although the costs can be recovered over the life of the system.

Wave energy is continuously available, although wave intensity varies by season. A wave energy scheme installed in Australia generates electricity with an 80% availability factor.

Reliability

Renewable energy sources are often dismissed as unreliable. Yet a diversity of renewable sources, each serving fewer and nearer users, would also greatly restrict the area blacked out if a grid connecting them failed. And when renewable energy sources do fail, they generally fail for shorter periods than do large power plants.[42]

Our complex, interdependent systems for the production and delivery of energy are vulnerable to simple but devastating acts of sabotage and terrorism. More efficient, diverse, dispersed, renewable energy systems can make major failures impossible.[43]

Storage of energy from renewable energy systems can also contribute to improved reliability.

Aesthetics

Some people dislike the aesthetics of large solar-electric installations outside cities. However, methods and opportunities exist to deploy these renewable technologies in an efficient and aesthetically pleasing way: fixed solar collectors can double as noise barriers along highways; tremendous roadway, parking lot, and roof-top area is available already (and rooftops could even be replaced totally by solar collectors); amorphous photovoltaic cells can be used to tint windows and produce energy, etc.

Environmental and social considerations

While most renewable energy sources do not produce pollution directly, the materials, industrial processes, and construction equipment used to create them may generate waste and pollution. Some renewable energy systems actually create environmental problems. For instance, older wind turbines can be hazardous to flying birds.

Land area required

Another environmental issue, particularly with biomass and biofuels, is the large amount of land required to harvest energy, which otherwise could be used for other purposes or left as undeveloped land. However, it should be pointed out that these fuels may reduce the need for harvesting non-renewable energy sources, such as vast strip-mined areas and slag mountains for coal, safety zones around nuclear plants, and hundreds of square miles being strip-mined for oil sands. These responses, however, do not account for the exremely high biodiversity and endemism of land used for ethanol crops, particularly sugar cane.

In the U.S., crops grown for biofuels are the most land- and water-intensive of the renewable energy sources. In 2005, about 12% of the nation’s corn crop (covering 11 million acres (45,000 km²) of farmland) was used to produce four billion gallons of ethanol—which equates to about 2% of annual U.S. gasoline consumption. For biofuels to make a much larger contribution to the energy economy, the industry will have to accelerate the development of new feedstocks, agricultural practices, and technologies that are more land and water efficient. Already, the efficiency of biofuels production has increased significantly[44] and there are new methods to boost biofuel production.[45]

More generally, renewable energy as a whole is sometimes viewed as too land-intensive to be practical. Yet harnessing renewable energy for electricity production requires less land and water than does our current energy system. Solar power plants that concentrate sunlight in desert areas require 10 km² per GWh (2,540 acre/GWh). On a lifecycle basis, this is less land than a comparable coal or hydropower plant requires, and because most deserts are sparsely populated, there is plenty of room for solar power plants. A little over 4,000 square miles—equivalent to 3.4% of the land in New Mexico—would be sufficient to produce 30% of the United States' electricity.[46]

Hydroelectric Dams

The major advantage of hydroelectric systems is the elimination of the cost of fuel. Other advantages include longer life than fuel-fired generation, low operating costs, and the provision of facilities for water sports. Operation of pumped-storage plants improves the daily load factor of the generation system. Overall, hydroelectric power can be far less expensive than electricity generated from fossil fuels or nuclear energy, and areas with abundant hydroelectric power attract industry.

However, there are several major disadvantages of hydroelectric systems. These include: dislocation of people living where the reservoirs are planned, release of significant amounts of carbon dioxide at construction and flooding of the reservoir, disruption of aquatic ecosystems and birdlife, adverse impacts on the river environment, potential risks of sabotage and terrorism, and in rare cases catastrophic failure of the dam wall. (See Hydroelectricity article for details.)

Hydroelectric power is now more difficult to site in developed nations because most major sites within these nations are either already being exploited or may be unavailable for other reasons such as environmental considerations.

Wind farms

Wind power is one of the most environmentally friendly sources of renewable energy

A wind farm, when installed on agricultural land, has one of the lowest environmental impacts of all energy sources:[47]

  • It occupies less land area per kilowatt-hour (kWh) of electricity generated than any other energy conversion system, apart from rooftop solar energy, and is compatible with grazing and crops.
  • It generates the energy used in its construction in just 3 months of operation, yet its operational lifetime is 20-25 years.
  • Greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution produced by its construction are tiny and declining. There are no emissions or pollution produced by its operation.
  • In substituting for base-load coal power, wind power produces a net decrease in greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution, and a net increase in biodiversity.
  • Modern wind turbines are almost silent and rotate so slowly (in terms of revolutions per minute) that they are rarely a hazard to birds.[48]

Studies of birds and offshore wind farms in Europe have found that there are very few bird collisions.[49] Several offshore wind sites in Europe have been in areas heavily used by seabirds. Improvements in wind turbine design, including a much slower rate of rotation of the blades and a smooth tower base instead of perchable lattice towers, have helped reduce bird mortality at wind farms around the world. However older smaller wind turbines may be hazardous to flying birds.[citation needed] Birds are severely impacted by fossil fuel energy; examples include birds dying from exposure to oil spills, habitat loss from acid rain and mountaintop removal coal mining, and mercury poisoning.[50]

Longevity issues

Though a source of renewable energy may last for billions of years, renewable energy infrastructure, like hydroelectric dams, will not last forever, and must be removed and replaced at some point. Events like the shifting of riverbeds, or changing weather patterns could potentially alter or even halt the function of hydroelectric dams, lowering the amount of time they are available to generate electricity.

Although geothermal sites are capable of providing heat for many decades, eventually specific locations may cool down. It is likely that in these locations, the system was designed too large for the site, since there is only so much energy that can be stored and replenished in a given volume of earth. Some interpret this as meaning a specific geothermal location can undergo depletion, and question whether geothermal energy is truly renewable. The government of Iceland states "it should be stressed that the geothermal resource is not strictly renewable in the same sense as the hydro resource." It estimates that Iceland's geothermal energy could provide 1700 MW for over 100 years, compared to the current production of 140 MW.[9] The International Energy Agency classifies geothermal power as renewable.[51]

Biofuels net energy balance

All biomass needs to go through some of these steps: it needs to be grown, collected, dried, fermented and burned. All of these steps require resources and an infrastructure.

Opponents of corn ethanol production in the U.S. often quote the 2005 paper of David Pimentel, a retired Entomologist, and Tadeusz Patzek, a Geological Engineer from Berkeley. Both have been exceptionally critical of ethanol and other biofuels. Their studies contend that ethanol, and biofuels in general, are "energy negative", meaning they take more energy to produce than is contained in the final product.

A 2006 report by the U.S. Department Agriculture compared the methodologies used by a number of researchers on this subject and found that the majority of researchers think the energy balance for ethanol is positive. In fact, a large number of recent studies, including a 2006 article in the prestigious journal Science offer the consensus opinion that fuels like ethanol are energy positive. Furthermore, it should be pointed out that fossil fuels also require significant energy inputs which have seldom been accounted for in the past.

According to the International Energy Agency, new biofuels technologies being developed today, notably cellulosic ethanol, could allow biofuels to play a much bigger role in the future than previously thought. [52] Cellulosic ethanol can be made from plant matter composed primarily of inedible cellulose fibers that form the stems and branches of most plants. Crop residues (such as corn stalks, wheat straw and rice straw), wood waste, and municipal solid waste are potential sources of cellulosic biomass. Dedicated energy crops, such as switchgrass, are also promising cellulose sources that can be sustainably produced in many regions of the United States.[53]

It should also be noted that the growing ethanol and biodiesel industries are providing jobs in plant construction, operations, and maintenance, mostly in rural communities. According to the Renewable Fuels Association, the ethanol industry created almost 154,000 U.S. jobs in 2005 alone, boosting household income by $5.7 billion. It also contributed about $3.5 billion in tax revenues at the local, state, and federal levels.[54]

Concluding comment

The U.S. electric power industry now relies on large, central power stations, including coal, natural gas, nuclear, and hydropower plants that together generate more than 95% of the nation’s electricity. Over the next few decades uses of renewable energy could help to diversify the nation’s bulk power supply. Already, appropriate renewable resources (which excludes large hydropower) produce 12% of northern California’s electricity.[55]

Although most of today’s electricity comes from large, central-station power plants, new technologies offer a range of options for generating electricity nearer to where it is needed, saving on the cost of transmitting and distributing power and improving the overall efficiency and reliability of the system.[55]

Improving energy efficiency represents the most immediate and often the most cost-effective way to reduce oil dependence, improve energy security, and reduce the health and environmental impact of the energy system. By reducing the total energy requirements of the economy, improved energy efficiency will make increased reliance on renewable energy sources more practical and affordable.[55]

Other issues

Fossil fuels

Though not universally held, Western (biogenic) theory is that fossil fuels are the altered remnants of ancient plant and animal life, deposited in sedimentary rocks millions of years ago, which have rested underground, mostly dormant, since that time. Although this process may continue today, it is extremely slow and produces a negligible amount of these resources compared to the rate of consumption by humans. Therefore, the Earth will eventually run out of fossil fuels (see peak oil). Fossil fuels are therefore not considered a renewable energy source, and are often contrasted with renewables in the context of future energy development.

Many believe that a move away from a US economy that is primarily dependent on fossil fuels will allow a more even-handed approach to foreign policy. Former CIA Director James Woolsey recently outlined the national security arguments in favor of moving away from fossil fuels. Video of Woolsey speech

Transmission

If renewable and distributed generation were to become widespread, electric power transmission and electricity distribution systems might no longer be the main distributors of electrical energy but would operate to balance the electricity needs of local communities. Those with surplus energy would sell to areas needing "top ups". That is, network operation would require a shift from 'passive management' — where generators are hooked up and the system is operated to get electricity 'downstream' to the consumer — to 'active management', wherein generators are spread across a network and inputs and outputs need to be constantly monitored to ensure proper balancing occurs within the system. Some Governments and regulators are moving to address this, though much remains to be done. One potential solution is the increased use of active management of electricity transmission and distribution networks. This will require significant changes in the way that such networks are operated.

However, on a smaller scale, use of renewable energy that can often be produced "onsite" lowers the requirements electricity distribution systems have to fulfill. Current systems, while rarely economically efficient, have proven an average household with a solar panel array and energy storage system of the right size needs electricity from outside sources for only a few hours every week. By matching electricity supply to end-use needs in this way, advocates of renewable energy and the soft energy path believe electricity systems will become smaller and easier to manage, rather than the opposite (see Soft energy technology).

Market development of renewable heat energy

Renewable heat is an application of renewable energy, namely the generation of heat from renewable sources. In some cases, contemporary discussion on renewable energy focuses on the generation of electrical, rather than heat energy. This is despite the fact that many colder countries consume more energy for heating than as electricity. On an annual basis the United Kingdom consumes 350 TWh[56] of electric power, and 840 TWh of gas and other fuels for heating. The residential sector alone consumes a massive 550 TWh of energy for heating, mainly in the form of gas.[57]

Renewable electric power is becoming cheap and convenient enough to place it, in many cases, within reach of the average consumer. By contrast, the market for renewable heat is mostly inaccessible to domestic consumers due to inconvenience of supply, and high capital costs. Heating accounts for a large proportion of energy consumption, however a universally accessible market for renewable heat is yet to emerge. Solutions such as geothermal heat pumps may be more widely applicable, but may not be economical in all cases. Also see renewable energy development.

Aviation applications

Kerosene, a petroleum-based fuel currently sourced from non-renewable sources, is considered to be the only fuel practical and economic for commercial jet-engine aviation. However, kerosene can now be manufactured from the light crude oil that is the output of the Thermal depolymerization of renewable feedstocks. Biodiesel, another candidate aviation fuel, is problematic due its tendency to freeze more readily than kerosene.

Smaller piston-engined aircraft are mainly fueled by aviation grade gasoline (avgas) but are increasingly being fueled by ethanol [1] or diesel. Given the proper equipment to prevent fuel gelling, a diesel-powered piston aircraft engine can be powered efficiently by biodiesel.

See also

References

  1. ^ United States Department of Energy Glossary of energy-related terms (URL accessed Dec 21, 2006)
  2. ^ Renewable Energy, Sorensen, Elsevier 2004
  3. ^ a b EWEA Executive summary "Analysis of Wind Energy in the EU-25". European Wind Energy Association. Retrieved 2007-03-11. {{cite web}}: Check |url= value (help)
  4. ^ Potentials and costs for renewable electricity generation
  5. ^ "Offshore stations experience mean wind speeds at 80 m that are ~90% greater than over land on average. Evaluation of global wind power
    "Overall, the researchers calculated winds at 80 meters [300 feet] traveled over the ocean at approximately 8.6 meters per second and at nearly 4.5 meters per second over land [20 and 10 miles per hour, respectively]." Global Wind Map Shows Best Wind Farm Locations (URL accessed January 30, 2006)
  6. ^ "High-altitude winds could provide a potentially enormous renewable energy source, and scientists like Roberts believe flying windmills could put an end to dependence on fossil fuels. At 15,000 feet, winds are strong and constant. On the ground, wind is often unreliable — the biggest problem for ground-based wind turbines." Windmills in the Sky (URL accessed January 30, 2006)
  7. ^ Status And Perspectives of Biomass-To-Liquid Fuels in the European Union
  8. ^ [http://www.ace.uiuc.edu/pERE/conference/papers/long.pdf Biomass Crops as a Source of Renewable Energy: European Experience with Miscanthus and Projections for Illinois]
  9. ^ a b RESPONSE OF WAIRAKEI GEOTHERMAL RESERVOIR TO 40 YEARS OF PRODUCTION, 2006 (pdf) Allan Clotworthy, Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2000. (accessed 30 March)
  10. ^ a b , World Energy Assessment 2001, Chapter 5: Energy Resources (table 5.26), coordinating lead author Hans-Holger Rogner. Available for download at its UNDP site.
  11. ^ World Energy Outlook 2004; OECD/International Energy Agency 2004.
  12. ^ a b , World Energy Assessment 2004 Update, (energy costs from Table 7). Available for download at its UNDP site.
  13. ^ Global wind energy markets continue to boom – 2006 another record year
  14. ^ Global wind energy markets continue to boom – 2006 another record year
  15. ^ Global wind energy markets continue to boom – 2006 another record year
  16. ^ Global wind energy markets continue to boom – 2006 another record year
  17. ^ Global wind energy markets continue to boom – 2006 another record year
  18. ^ Windfarms to power a third of London homes
  19. ^ Largest solar power plant in a generation to be built in Nevada
  20. ^ The California Solar Initiative
  21. ^ The California Solar Initiative
  22. ^ Financial Incentives in the USA
  23. ^ Phase One of 40 MW German Solar Park Begun
  24. ^ Major solar power plant opens in Portugal
  25. ^ Portugal starts huge solar plant
  26. ^ World's largest solar photovoltaic power plant to be built
  27. ^ Solar Systems -- 154MW Victorian Project
  28. ^ Solar Integrated in New Jersey
  29. ^ Onsite Renewable Technologies
  30. ^ America and Brazil Intersect on Ethanol
  31. ^ Policies for a More Sustainable Energy Future
  32. ^ American energy: The renewable path to energy security
  33. ^ American energy: The renewable path to energy security
  34. ^ Sea machine makes waves in Europe
  35. ^ Wave energy contract goes abroad
  36. ^ Primeiro parque mundial de ondas na Póvoa de Varzim
  37. ^ Orkney to get 'biggest' wave farm
  38. ^ Renewables global status report 2006 Update
  39. ^ Renewables global status report 2006 Update
  40. ^ Renewables global status report 2006 Update
  41. ^ The fragility of domestic energy
  42. ^ The fragility of domestic energy
  43. ^ [http://www.rmi.org/sitepages/pid1011.php Brittle Power: Energy Strategy for National Security]
  44. ^ American energy: The renewable path to energy security
  45. ^ Hyrogen injection could boost biofuel production
  46. ^ American Energy -- The Renewable Path to Energy Security
  47. ^ Why Australia needs wind power
  48. ^ Why Australia needs wind power
  49. ^ newscientist.com June 2005 Wind turbines a breeze for migrating birds
  50. ^ http://www.capewind.org/FAQ-Category8-Cape+Wind+and+the+Environment-Parent0-myfaq-yes.htm#43
  51. ^ Geodynamics says it has the "hottest rocks on earth"
  52. ^ International Energy Agency, World Energy Outlook 2006, page 8
  53. ^ http://bio.org/ind/biofuel/CellulosicEthanolIssueBrief.pdf Industrial Biotechnology Is Revolutionizing the Production of Ethanol Transportation Fuel], pages 3-4.
  54. ^ American Energy -- The Renewable Path to Energy Security
  55. ^ a b c "American Energy: The Renewable Path to Energy Security" (PDF). Worldwatch Institute. September 2006. Retrieved 2007-03-11.
  56. ^ Department of Trade and Industry report UK Energy in Brief July 2005 (URL accessed Mar 18, 2006)
  57. ^ Department of Trade and Industry, 2005 study on Renewable Heat (URL accessed Mar 18, 2006)


Template:Energy Development and Use