Jump to content

Talk:2019–2020 Hong Kong protests: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 130: Line 130:
:{{reply|Dunutubble}} we don't need another vote.....the previous discussion has concluded that the article need to be trim . Rather we need discussion on how. [[User:Matthew hk|Matthew hk]] ([[User talk:Matthew hk|talk]]) 00:14, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
:{{reply|Dunutubble}} we don't need another vote.....the previous discussion has concluded that the article need to be trim . Rather we need discussion on how. [[User:Matthew hk|Matthew hk]] ([[User talk:Matthew hk|talk]]) 00:14, 16 October 2021 (UTC)


* '''Comment'''. Agree with Matthew. It's all about how. I saw his message on an online forum and I agree with his reasoning. [[Special:Contributions/210.6.10.118|210.6.10.118]] ([[User talk:210.6.10.118|talk]]) 13:50, 20 October 2021 (UTC)


== New session about the Criticism of protesters is needed ==
== New session about the Criticism of protesters is needed ==

Revision as of 13:50, 20 October 2021

    Template:Vital article This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 September 2020 and 11 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Taylortai0205 (article contribs).

    Article milestones
    DateProcessResult
    April 8, 2020Guild of Copy EditorsCopyedited
    July 26, 2020Peer reviewNot reviewed
    In the newsNews items involving this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on June 11, 2019, June 24, 2019, October 2, 2019, December 3, 2019, and June 5, 2020.

    The protest are still going on.

    The protest are still happening and for the same reasons plus more under CCP China. A correction on the title and some limelight towards their struggle would be nice 2601:100:C100:3540:650A:BC2C:A34E:8CE (talk) 15:38, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Do you have any source? Citobun (talk) 22:31, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    I would say 2021 Hong Kong protest or even History of Hong Kong (2020-) may be better article title to cover the post National Security Law Hong Kong. Just one thing i am pretty sure mass scale protest does not exist in Hong Kong now. You want to reflect the real world , create wiki article to cover the mass scale arrest and dissolution of political parties , citing news article should be the real thing to do. Matthew hk (talk) 18:51, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Ok but do you have a reliable source for this? TypeKnight03 (talk) 04:51, 24 Aug 2021 (UTC)

    Article size split

    • Support split - To follow up on a previous discussion, since there is consensus to split, I suggest reducing the "Reactions", "Impact", "Local media coverage", "Police misconduct", "Online confrontations", "Background", "History" as well as the "Clashes between protesters and counter-protesters" sections to ONE paragraph each, and having the rest covered in the sub articles. Obviously, I am open to suggestions. --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:34, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Why are we having this discussion every other month... Reducing the sections to ONE paragraph is an absurd idea. For instance, the article for World War II has way more than just six paragraphs. We probably need a short overview on the changes in Hong Kong one year after the NSL was enacted, but other than, this article is completed and shouldn't be changed significantly. OceanHok (talk) 13:38, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    It is How to split need to be discuss. Or noone bold enough to throw out the details and leave the real essence to actually summarize the protest and the impact. Matthew hk (talk) 18:47, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    @Dunutubble: we don't need another vote.....the previous discussion has concluded that the article need to be trim . Rather we need discussion on how. Matthew hk (talk) 00:14, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    New session about the Criticism of protesters is needed

    The article only mentions police violence, but as far as I know, the protesters also engaged in violent acts such as assaulting police, vandalizing public property, abducting passers-by, and so on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nana byun (talkcontribs) 02:36, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    You may go to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reactions_to_the_2019%E2%80%932020_Hong_Kong_protests for this info. BliredArm (talk) 05:37, 14 October 2021 (UTC) BliredArm (talk · contribs) is a confirmed sock puppet of Dgtdddsx123 (talk · contribs). [reply]

    October 2021: Lead

    The lead was recently changed unilaterally by Dgtdddsx123 as if the article was moved, and as such it no longer conforms to MOS:FIRST. I do not see any real opposition though aside from myself and I am uninterested in a discussion between just me and them. I think the discussion regarding the title of this article should be revived, and my thoughts are as follows:

    • A source using the term "2019–2020 Hong Kong protests" or "2019–2021 Hong Kong protests" is not sufficient justification for its inclusion in the lead. The goal is to avoid redundancy in the lead (i.e. avoid, "The 2019–2021 Hong Kong protests are a series of demonstrations since 15 March 2019 ...")
    • This article is about the Anti-Extradition Law Amendment Bill Movement and the aftermath of its suppression. This article does not cover any protests or demonstrations that occurred in 2021, only the subsequent crackdown. The source provided that uses the term "2019–2021 Hong Kong protests" makes the same mistake.

    All the best, CentreLeftRight 06:42, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    It is to keep pages from contradicting each other. You can also leave comments on the pages that discuss criticism of protesters and about the protests/suppression in 2021 if necessary.
    All the best☺,Dgtdddsx123 (talk) 07:31, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    The title "Anti-Extradition Law Amendment Bill Movement" is kind of a common name in Cantonese, but not really in English. I think we need to accept the fact that there is no more actual act of protest in Hong Kong since July 2020. There is only resentment against the government, but little to no actions to actually defy it in 2021. OceanHok (talk) 07:35, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    I doubt hrichina is deemed a reliable source or not. Matthew hk (talk) 17:07, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    List of updated relevant sites. [remark]

    [remark]
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_reactions_to_the_Hong_Kong_national_security_law_(August_2021)
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_reactions_to_the_Hong_Kong_national_security_law_(September_2021)
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reactions_to_the_2019%E2%80%932020_Hong_Kong_protests
    One can leave both negative/positive comments for the protests on the third page.
    This is a flexible page. Dgtdddsx123 (talk) 2:46, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

    This article is way too long. Probably just add a hatnote that ask reader to read another article for post-protest clamp down of Hong Kong freedom and democracy? Feel free to create History of Hong Kong (2019-) or History of Hong Kong (2020-), or just ask reader to read Hong Kong national security law and the effect of literally nuke the pro-democracy political parties into dust? Matthew hk (talk) 09:26, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]