User contributions for Oward98
A user with 91 edits. Account created on 19 August 2018.
20 February 2021
- 12:4912:49, 20 February 2021 diff hist +2,522 Bloomsbury (ward) Added much more information on the ward, with references added. Tag: Visual edit
- 12:1112:11, 20 February 2021 diff hist +1,566 Camden London Borough Council →Criticisms: Add a section on the local employment scandal to criticisms.
25 January 2021
- 14:5214:52, 25 January 2021 diff hist −523 m Bloomsbury Remove three unnecessary and slightly dubious references from opening sentence of lead. Material highly unlikely to ever be challenged. (MOS:CITELEAD)
- 14:4614:46, 25 January 2021 diff hist +28 m Bloomsbury →External links: fix error in site name
- 14:4514:45, 25 January 2021 diff hist +72 m Bloomsbury →External links: add Bloomsbury Conservation Area site to external links section following removal from body of article
- 14:4314:43, 25 January 2021 diff hist +158 m Bloomsbury →Conservation: add reference after removal of external link to preserve verifiability
24 January 2021
- 15:1815:18, 24 January 2021 diff hist +6 User talk:MB →Bloomsbury Lead
- 11:3111:31, 24 January 2021 diff hist +934 User talk:MB →Bloomsbury Lead
- 11:1511:15, 24 January 2021 diff hist 0 m Bloomsbury →Conservation: remove capital letter mistake again
- 11:1411:14, 24 January 2021 diff hist 0 m Bloomsbury remove capital letter mistake in 'Conservation area'
23 January 2021
- 11:4211:42, 23 January 2021 diff hist +39 m Bloomsbury add back in link for now, discussion to be had with User MB
- 11:4011:40, 23 January 2021 diff hist +929 User talk:MB Bloomsbury Lead edit discussion
- 11:3211:32, 23 January 2021 diff hist +8 m Bloomsbury correct accidentally deleted word from last edit.
20 January 2021
- 22:0422:04, 20 January 2021 diff hist +591 m Talk:Bloomsbury →Conservation & Heritage Addition to Lede: explain subsequent edit
- 22:0122:01, 20 January 2021 diff hist −337 m Bloomsbury Condensed the lead addition on conservation to make it more reflective of article content and more impartial as to cause of concern
- 21:5021:50, 20 January 2021 diff hist −13 m Bloomsbury →Conservation and Heritage: changed title from 'Conservation and Heritage' to 'Conservation' as this makes more sense
- 21:4821:48, 20 January 2021 diff hist +1,362 Talk:Bloomsbury Explanation of reversion of Bloomsbury conservation and heritage lede deletion.
- 21:4121:41, 20 January 2021 diff hist +928 Bloomsbury Undid revision 1001689940 by Cristiano Tomás (talk) Discuss in talk page, Wikipedia guidance on ledes. Tag: Undo
- 18:4718:47, 20 January 2021 diff hist +928 Bloomsbury Add lede section on risk to Bloomsbury's heritage, summarising section previously added, in line with Wikipedia's best practice on ledes. Tag: Reverted
- 18:4018:40, 20 January 2021 diff hist 0 m Bloomsbury Move 'Conservation and Heritage' above 'Geography'. Closer to the previous 'History' section in content than geography.
- 18:3818:38, 20 January 2021 diff hist −53 m Bloomsbury →Geography: fix grammatical errors
- 18:3718:37, 20 January 2021 diff hist +617 m Bloomsbury →Geography: make less informal, remove some erroneous material, add some more material
- 18:2518:25, 20 January 2021 diff hist 0 m Bloomsbury →Conservation and Heritage: change meter to metre as this is an english page
- 18:2418:24, 20 January 2021 diff hist +12 m Bloomsbury →Conservation and Heritage: finally fix image properly.
- 18:2118:21, 20 January 2021 diff hist +1 m Bloomsbury →Conservation and Heritage: fix full stop
- 18:2018:20, 20 January 2021 diff hist −1 m Bloomsbury →Conservation and Heritage: fix comma
- 18:1518:15, 20 January 2021 diff hist −16 m Bloomsbury →Conservation and Heritage: fix image again
- 18:1418:14, 20 January 2021 diff hist +11 m Bloomsbury →Conservation and Heritage: fix size of image
- 18:1318:13, 20 January 2021 diff hist +89 m Bloomsbury →Conservation and Heritage: Add image
- 18:0818:08, 20 January 2021 diff hist −4 m Bloomsbury →Conservation and Heritage: small stylistic change
- 18:0718:07, 20 January 2021 diff hist +4,949 Bloomsbury Add a detailed section on current conservation and heritage efforts. May need someone to look at references to ensure proper format.
3 November 2020
- 13:0213:02, 3 November 2020 diff hist +1,110 m Superluminal motion →Explanation: Resolved the inconsistent explanation of the effect, added a reference, based largely upon strict mathematical considerations rather than observed physics.
2 December 2019
- 00:1100:11, 2 December 2019 diff hist +313 Augustus Pugin →Conversion to the Roman Catholic Church: Edited a paragraph talking about dissension in British Society in the 19th Century. Added detail and removed a factually incorrect statement about the Roman Catholic Relief Act of 1829. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
13 August 2019
- 12:4712:47, 13 August 2019 diff hist +55 m King Edward VI Camp Hill School for Girls Undid revision 910234430 by Greyjoy (talk) Greyjoy - there was already a reference to the Independent's Article whihch includes the statistic - I simply meant that I would add another. Tag: Undo
9 August 2019
- 16:0116:01, 9 August 2019 diff hist +346 User talk:Greyjoy →Camp Hill School: new section
- 15:5815:58, 9 August 2019 diff hist +55 m King Edward VI Camp Hill School for Boys →Admissions controversy 2020: addition of statistic - to be referenced within 24 hours
- 15:5715:57, 9 August 2019 diff hist +55 m King Edward VI Camp Hill School for Girls →Admissions controversy 2020: addition of statistic - to be referenced within 24 hours
- 11:3611:36, 9 August 2019 diff hist +193 m King Edward VI Camp Hill School for Boys →Admission: referral to previous admissions arrangement, to avoid any confusion.
- 11:3511:35, 9 August 2019 diff hist +200 King Edward VI Camp Hill School for Girls →Admission: Rewrite of admissions to update the situation, changing for admissions in 2020, which is the next relevant date for admissions. Addition of sources. See boys' school page for more info.
- 11:3211:32, 9 August 2019 diff hist +552 King Edward VI Camp Hill School for Girls →Admissions Controversy 2019: Various updates in line with the boys' school page. Correction of errors, and insertion of sources
- 11:2811:28, 9 August 2019 diff hist +107 m King Edward VI Camp Hill School for Boys →Admissions Controversy 2020
- 11:2511:25, 9 August 2019 diff hist +127 m King Edward VI Camp Hill School for Boys →Admissions Controversy 2020: Another source
- 11:2511:25, 9 August 2019 diff hist +243 m King Edward VI Camp Hill School for Boys →Admissions Controversy 2020: Addition of sources for claims that I made that were initially unsupported.
- 11:1211:12, 9 August 2019 diff hist 0 King Edward VI Camp Hill School for Boys →Admissions Controversy 2019: Again, Silly error fixed
- 11:1211:12, 9 August 2019 diff hist +1 m King Edward VI Camp Hill School for Boys →Admissions Controversy 2019: formatting error fixed
- 11:0411:04, 9 August 2019 diff hist 0 m King Edward VI Camp Hill School for Boys →Admissions Controversy 2019: formatting error fixed
- 11:0411:04, 9 August 2019 diff hist +74 m King Edward VI Camp Hill School for Boys →Admissions Controversy 2019: Update to my previous edit - I mistakenly wrote 2019 rather than 2020. Inclusion of reference which I overlooked.
- 11:0311:03, 9 August 2019 diff hist −395 King Edward VI Camp Hill School for Boys →Admission: Update to admissions policy from 2020 onwards. Old admission section now outdated, and so required a rewrite.
8 August 2019
- 20:3820:38, 8 August 2019 diff hist +1,949 King Edward VI Camp Hill School for Girls addition of admissions controversy section in 2019, widely covered in media, updating outdated admissions section
- 20:3620:36, 8 August 2019 diff hist +1,949 King Edward VI Camp Hill School for Boys Addition of section updating admissions arrangements, also talking about controversies raised in consultation and in the media.
