User contributions for GoofyGoofyson
A user with 359 edits. Account created on 30 April 2022.
22 September 2023
- 11:2811:28, 22 September 2023 diff hist −2,334 Battle of Raduša I have edited this page to JSTOR citations standard not NLA commanders and citations about other battles, i have also added both NLA and Macedonian claims in brackets which was removed Tag: Reverted
- 11:1211:12, 22 September 2023 diff hist +1,867 Talk:Battle of Raduša →POV pushing: new section Tag: New topic
- 11:0411:04, 22 September 2023 diff hist +738 Talk:Battle of Raduša →Casualties: Reply Tag: Reply
- 10:5710:57, 22 September 2023 diff hist −139 m Battle of Tetovo The result section is not used for POV pushing or quoting unconfirmed or out of context reports Tag: Reverted
- 10:5610:56, 22 September 2023 diff hist −530 m Battle of Tetovo There is nothing to disucss in the talk section, a single citation from the second day of the battle citing an UCK commander is not a reliable source for the entire battle Tag: Reverted
- 10:5510:55, 22 September 2023 diff hist −2,079 Aračinovo crisis Removed biased citations from former NLA commanders and unreliable reporting in order to POV push. There are more than enough citations that the Aracinovo battle was not going well for the NLA its discussed in a whole section you cannot push one POV in the infobox, furthermore this was never discussed in the talk section but when i reverted it to what it was before i have to explain myself in the talk section? Which i have so go argue there Tag: Reverted
- 10:5310:53, 22 September 2023 diff hist +1,185 Talk:Aračinovo crisis →POV pushing: new section Tag: New topic
- 10:4810:48, 22 September 2023 diff hist −507 2001 insurgency in Macedonia None of the citations mention any number of tanks especially not 115, teh one citation from Pande Petrovski mentions 60 tanks being used and in operable condition
- 10:4410:44, 22 September 2023 diff hist +2,039 Talk:2001 insurgency in Macedonia →Misuse of sources and proposing to merge several "battles" to one front: Reply Tag: Reply
- 10:2210:22, 22 September 2023 diff hist +685 Talk:2001 insurgency in Macedonia →Misuse of sources and proposing to merge several "battles" to one front: Reply Tag: Reply
- 10:2010:20, 22 September 2023 diff hist +3,216 Talk:2001 insurgency in Macedonia →Misuse of sources and proposing to merge several "battles" to one front: Reply Tag: Reply
- 09:5209:52, 22 September 2023 diff hist +207 Talk:2001 insurgency in Macedonia →Misuse of sources and proposing to merge several "battles" to one front: Reply Tag: Reply
27 August 2023
- 15:5615:56, 27 August 2023 diff hist +3,560 Talk:2001 insurgency in Macedonia →Misuse of sources and proposing to merge several "battles" to one front: new section Tag: New topic
- 15:4615:46, 27 August 2023 diff hist −2,595 Aračinovo crisis The sources about the Macedonian army failing to capture the village are directly contraicted by several cited sources within the article itslef inscluding US Army sources from KFOR, the Macedonian Army forces in the article were not for the battle of Aracinovo but were the total active servicemen in the Army as stated by the citation
- 15:0215:02, 27 August 2023 diff hist +133 User talk:GoofyGoofyson →Accusing other editors of vandalism: Reply Tag: Reply
- 15:0115:01, 27 August 2023 diff hist −524 Battle of Tetovo added the clarified section of the casualties as the casualties counted include the ambushes aroudn the city which are also included in the main article and deleted the citation for UCK casualties as the source is an NLA commander from 18 march, which is the very first days of the battle before the first Macedonian ground offensive a week later Tag: Reverted
- 14:4614:46, 27 August 2023 diff hist +489 Talk:2001 insurgency in Macedonia →Semi-protected edit request on 5 July 2021 (2): Reply Tag: Reply
- 14:4214:42, 27 August 2023 diff hist −136 2001 insurgency in Macedonia Checked the sources, i dont know where the numbers came from, according to the cites source the number was 20.000 not 40.000 the ARM had 94 tanks total in 1999 but only 60 were combat capable and crewed during the war as per the source. Also there is no information what so ever of an Mi24 being shot down the source states that the government denied an NLA claim to having shot down a helicopter it doesn't even mention a model
- 14:2914:29, 27 August 2023 diff hist +350 Talk:2001 insurgency in Macedonia →NATO vandalization: Reply Tag: Reply
28 January 2023
- 13:3613:36, 28 January 2023 diff hist −1,928 2001 insurgency in Macedonia Undid revision 1136051466 by Albanian 7 (talk) NATO and KFOR operated in KOSOVO not in Macedonia stop vandalizing the page. Tanusevci is on the border with Kosovo, Macedonian Army operated in Macedonia, KFOR operated in Kosovo. Tags: Undo Reverted
- 13:3413:34, 28 January 2023 diff hist 0 m Talk:Battle of Vaksince GoofyGoofyson moved page Talk:Battle of Vaksince to Talk:Operation Vaksince over redirect: Revert undiscussed move (WP:RMUM)
- 13:3413:34, 28 January 2023 diff hist 0 m Battle of Vaksince GoofyGoofyson moved page Battle of Vaksince to Operation Vaksince over redirect: Revert undiscussed move (WP:RMUM)
- 13:3213:32, 28 January 2023 diff hist −16 Battle of Vaksince No edit summary Tag: Reverted
- 13:3213:32, 28 January 2023 diff hist −9,036 Battle of Vaksince This article was and is about the Military Operation on May 25th, the article about the battle of Vaksince was MERGED previously, you cannot unilaterally merge articles to diminish or remove Macedonian victories and imply Albanian ones. Tags: Manual revert Reverted
- 13:3013:30, 28 January 2023 diff hist +415 Talk:Battle of Vaksince →Rename "Operation Vaksince" to "Battle of Vaksince": Reply Tag: Reply
- 13:2813:28, 28 January 2023 diff hist −1 Battle of Matejče The article you use i have read 10 times 1 tank was lost in Matejce, 1 in Radusha, two during the whole war. Tag: Reverted
- 13:2713:27, 28 January 2023 diff hist −2,155 Battle of Matejče No edit summary Tag: Reverted
- 13:2413:24, 28 January 2023 diff hist −3,065 Battle of Matejče No edit summary Tag: Reverted
- 13:2313:23, 28 January 2023 diff hist +1,101 Talk:2001 insurgency in Macedonia →NATO vandalization: new section Tag: New topic
- 13:1713:17, 28 January 2023 diff hist −1,928 2001 insurgency in Macedonia STOP vandalising the page, NATO was not part of the conflict they were mediators, Bulgaria provided equipment in 1999, and Turkey like all governments supported the Macedonian government against insrugents, the citation literally says that Albania completely supported the Macedonian government yet you don't add Albania to the infobox Tag: Reverted
- 13:0313:03, 28 January 2023 diff hist +2,469 Talk:Battle of Matejče →Vandalism by GoofyGoofson: Reply Tag: Reply
- 12:5512:55, 28 January 2023 diff hist +6,465 Talk:2001 insurgency in Macedonia →Constant vandalism in order to create NLA victories and editing in bad faith: new section Tag: New topic
- 11:1311:13, 28 January 2023 diff hist −283 2001 insurgency in Macedonia Undid revision 1135973036 by Albanian 7 (talk) How many times does the same issue have to be brought up? Bulgaria supplied military aid BEFORE the war? from 1999 to 2000 Tag: Undo
27 January 2023
- 14:4914:49, 27 January 2023 diff hist +2,249 Operation MH-1 Are you serious? The Macedonian Army launches an offensive, the NLA retreats and you tell me it doesnt say anywhere they recaptured the territory? Did they just stand around? This is a Macedonian victoruy as per the sources, this nitpicking is now absurd
- 14:3414:34, 27 January 2023 diff hist −783 Battle of Raduša The NLA capture of the police station and army barracks is the only verified information, your source about the NLA capture of Radusha and supposed failed counterattack are from JULY again misusing sources, you deleted a JSTOR source which is peer reviewed to fit your own agenda, if Macedonian sources are unreliable then neither are the ALbanian sources you are using, casualties should use BOTH claims not just Albanian claims Tag: Reverted
- 14:2914:29, 27 January 2023 diff hist −2,855 Battle of Matejče The battle for Matejce was not a victory for the NLA the fighting continued but was stopped by the Macedonian Army due to the continued presence of civilians as it was largely pressured by the EU to avoid civilian casualties, stop inventing battles with timeframes that only suit your agenda, the battle like most battles in the war were a serious of skirmishes and ceasefires. The Macedonian Army did not conduct full military operations in Matejce or the Kumanovo region Tag: Reverted
- 13:1213:12, 27 January 2023 diff hist −9,036 Battle of Vaksince I would advise you to STOP vandalising pages, the Vaksince battle was merged with the main article, this page was about the Macedonian Army offensive on May 25 which ended in a Macedonian victory, you cannot change page to suit your liking Tag: Reverted
- 12:3312:33, 27 January 2023 diff hist −576 2001 insurgency in Macedonia No edit summary
- 12:2212:22, 27 January 2023 diff hist +1,171 Talk:Battle of Raduša →German source: Reply Tag: Reply
- 12:1712:17, 27 January 2023 diff hist −373 2001 insurgency in Macedonia NATO was not a beligirent in the conflict, British and US army "support" were operations by KFOR on Kosovo territory to stop flow of NLA through the Kosovo border which was what the purpose of KFOR is, if NATO helped anyone in the conflict it helped the NLA as it did by halting Macedonian offensives, forcing political solutions and evacuating the NLA from Aracinovo yet nobody has added it to the NLA side in the conflict. Do not vandalize
22 January 2023
- 22:5222:52, 22 January 2023 diff hist −226 m Template:Campaignbox Insurgencies in North Macedonia removed Vaksince 1 and Vaksince 2 from the infobox of the insurgencies in Macedonia because the pages were merged. Removed the battles that do not have wiki pages to remove clutter
- 22:4922:49, 22 January 2023 diff hist +21 Ljuboten incident The NLA denied the incident, there was no ambush, the truck ran over a landmine which could have been placed by anybody, a truck running over a landmine is neither a battle nor an ambush and cannot be considered a victory, this was already agreed Tag: Reverted
- 22:4522:45, 22 January 2023 diff hist +2,285 Operation MH-1 The Macedonian victory result was properly cited and all you had to do was check the sources, even the Albanian commander claimed they withdrew from the area making the result a success, you replaced cited content with uncited content that the Macedonian security forces had not captured Gracani, every "ambush" on the wiki where a Macedonian jeep runs over a landmine is declared an NLA victory but an offensive that drove out the NLA is disputed Tag: Reverted
4 January 2023
- 20:0520:05, 4 January 2023 diff hist +894 Brest attack Added citations, the Army convoy broke through the encirclement as evidenced by the fact that army reinforcements arrived, all the sources clearly state 30 policemen, and what sources claim 50 rebels? The only one i read said 300-500 in the area?
- 12:4312:43, 4 January 2023 diff hist −35 2001 insurgency in Macedonia The "until August" text is redundant as that is when the war ended, furthermore the ANA was the main perpetrator of the Trebosh Ambush in November making it both redundant and wrong
- 11:3611:36, 4 January 2023 diff hist −2,662 Battle of Raduša Its been well over a month and nobody has replied in the talk page, what i did was streamline the article because it was tagged for excessive citations, so i only used ONE or TWO citations that confirm events and removed others for redundancy, the result is still the same only streamlined please don't edit war and use the talk page for any clarifications thank you
- 11:0811:08, 4 January 2023 diff hist +248 Talk:2001 insurgency in Macedonia →Proposed merge of Vaksince Attack into 2001 insurgency in Macedonia: Reply Tag: Reply
7 December 2022
- 12:5412:54, 7 December 2022 diff hist −88 Brest attack Two of the sources say there were dozens/30 policemen they were majority Albanian as mentioned by the mayor of Lipkovo in the NY times citations and this was clearly am ambush why is it called an attack? Same thing with the vaksince ambush Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
27 November 2022
- 17:1217:12, 27 November 2022 diff hist +1,592 Talk:Skopje →Proto-Albanian theory in the name section/POV pushing: Reply Tag: Reply
12 November 2022
- 22:4122:41, 12 November 2022 diff hist +1,713 Talk:Skopje →Proto-Albanian theory in the name section/POV pushing: Reply Tag: Reply
