This page is part of WikiProject Current events, an attempt to expand and better organize information in articles related to current events. If you would like to participate in the project, visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.Current eventsWikipedia:WikiProject Current eventsTemplate:WikiProject Current eventsCurrent events articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Rights groups say afghan women committing suicide at alarming rate; Women rights groups say that last year, almost 500 women chose death or disfigurement to life of despair by setting themselves on fire to escape forced marriages, slavery or sexual and other types of abuse.(VOA)
Can you provide specific wording here? National League for Democracy is unsourced, not a big fan of unsourced pages on the main page. Not really the biggest thing in Burma going on anyways. --Lemmey talk 18:08, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I bolded Aung San Suu Kyi in the item to show that it is the updated article. Until there is a cyclone update, this appears to be a reasonable candidate, though not as big as the Sichuan update that went up. - BanyanTree 00:15, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Added. Timer says 24 hours since last update and this older candidate appears reasonable. It doesn't include as much prose about the update as I'd like, but there's really not much to say beyond "still imprisoned" so I'll give it a pass. Placed under the Sichuan item of the same date as being less significant. (I expect an uproar about "timers resulting in ITN trivia" now.) - BanyanTree 22:52, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm against the Aung San Suu Kyi item going up. A single sentence in the article describes her house arrest extension...generally speaking, if a single line is all that can really be said about a subject (in the subject's article), I'd prefer it wouldn't go up. If expansion was included, (for example: reason junta gave for her arrest extension), then I might consider supporting. SpencerT♦C 00:17, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
As I note above, it's marginal. Normally I look for at least a paragraph of updated text for an existing article, or a decent stub in the case of a new article. Given that the reason for the extension was the same as why she's under house arrest in the first place, which is detailed, I felt that demanding that the reason be reiterated just for ITN would be a bit much. I probably wouldn't have put this as the top item given the level of updated text, but am OK with inserting it into the middle of the template, if you follow my fuzzy reasoning on weighing the various factors. - BanyanTree 00:34, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Personally, I'm not too big on any of these...the DNA sequencing one I considered, but in the article, there was a single, unsourced line mentioning it. SpencerT♦C 19:44, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have now added a reference for the brief update in DNA sequence. Keep in mind that the items in the 'Current events' box are not all ITN candidates, but they should be considered potential candidates. Thanks.--Pharos (talk) 20:22, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'd put the dynamiting of the dam in Sichuan up, and bold 2008 Sichuan Earthquake to get an ongoing story back on ITN with new info. Random89 19:46, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. Sounds good to me now that I look at the article. SpencerT♦C 19:57, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I too concur but in a non voting manner in accordance with new trial period procedures (that do not spell out what to do after the trial period or how the trial will be evaluated...) --Lemmey talk 20:01, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Presumably, we will have a vote. But, since we apparently no longer have the right to vote here, I assume it will end up like the Soviet Union, where one man will decide what goes up while he kills a couple million of the rest of us. This trial is the beginning of the itn's five-year plan, trust me. --PlasmaTwa2 21:31, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I also concur in a non-diplomatic fashion, The earthquake one is good. --PlasmaTwa2 21:24, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The earthquake article has not yet been updated with that information.--Pharos (talk) 22:29, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I updated it myself. The item is posted.--Pharos (talk) 23:24, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
But despite the large red box (why is it not flashing?) telling us the template needs to be updated, no admin has come by and done it? Oh right, On ITN, the template updates you!Random89 22:15, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There has been an update now, and the timing on the box has been adjusted.--Pharos (talk) 23:24, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I like the Aung San Suu Kyi and the china items. Possibly also the DNA. The Aung San Kyi article could do with some attention though at the moment it doesn't really do the job of clearly explaining the most recent developments. Billsmith453 (talk) 14:14, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
