Frenchman Mountain Dolostone
| Frenchman Mountain Dolostone | |
|---|---|
| Stratigraphic range: Middle Cambrian [1] | |
| Type | Geological formation |
| Unit of | Tonto Group[1] |
| Underlies | Temple Butte Formation in Frenchmen Mountain to western Grand Canyon. Redwall Limestone and locally Temple Butte Formation in central Grand Canyon. |
| Overlies | Muav Limestone |
| Thickness | up to 1,217 feet (371 m) |
| Lithology | |
| Primary | dolomite |
| Other | shale |
| Location | |
| Region | Northern Arizona (Grand Canyon) and southern Nevada. |
| Country | United States of America |
| Type section | |
| Named for | Frenchman Mountain, Nevada |
| Named by | V. S. Korolev[2] and K. E. Karlstrom, S. M. Rowland and others[1][3] |
| Location | Frenchman Mountain, Nevada |
| Year defined | 2023 |
| Coordinates | 36°11′29″N 115°00′27″W / 36.1915°N 115.0076°W |
| Region | southern Nevada |
| Country | United States of America |
| Thickness at type section | 1,217 feet (371 m) |
The Frenchman Mountain Dolostone is the uppermost and youngest of five Cambrian geologic formations that comprise the Tonto Group. It consists of beds of mottled white to gray dolomite often separated by thin seams of shale, especially in its lower part. In the Grand Canyon, this formation forms vertical cliffs that thicken westward between the top of the Muav Limestone and the base of either the Devonian Temple Butte Formation or Mississippian Redwall Limestone. Because of unidentified trace fossils and lack of datable body fossils, the Frenchman Mountain Dolostone exact age is uncertain. Within the Grand Canyon, its thickness varies between 200 and 450 feet (61 and 137 m). West into the Lake Mead region, it thickens considerably and is 1,217 feet (371 m) thick at Frenchman Mountain near Las Vegas, Nevada.[1][3][4]
Nomenclature[edit]
Until 2020, the Frenchman Mountain Dolostone was also informally called at one time either the supra-Muav, Grand Wash Dolomite, subdivision A, or Cambrian undifferentiated dolomites until formally assigned to and renamed as the Frenchman Mountain Dolostone.[1] In some publications, the dolomite beds comprising the Frenchman Mountain Dolostone is ignored and only the Muav Limestone is illustrated.[3]
In 1875, G. K. Gilbert[5] first mapped the Tonto Group within the Grand Canyon. He also subdivided it, from base to top, into the Tonto sandstone, Tonto shale, and Marbled Limestone.[6]
In 1914,[6] Gilbert's three subdivisions of the Tonto Group were renamed by L. F. Noble. The Tonto sandstone was renamed as the Tapeats Sandstone. The Tonto shale was renamed as the Bright Angel Shale. The Marbled limestone was renamed as the Muav Limestone. L. F. Noble redefined his Muav Limestone as being the ...the predominantly calcareous part of the Tonto group. lying beneath either the discontinuous lenses of overlying Devonian beds or base of the Redwall Limestone and overlying the Bright Angel Shale.[6]
In 1922,[7] the Muav Limestone was subdivided by L F. Noble into four informal subdivisions. From top to base, they are subdivision A, bluff massive dolomite; subdivision B, gray cross-bedded sandstone; subdivision C, thin-bedded mottled limestone; and subdivision D, basal thin-bedded mottle limestone.[7]
Later in 1945, E. D. McKee and C. E. Resser[8] removed subdivision A of L F. Noble from both the Muav Limestone and the Tonto Group. It assigned it to an informal geologic unit called the Cambrian undifferentiated dolomites. This action created an informal formation-rank geologic unit composed entirely of dolomite that overlies the limestone beds of the Muav Limestone.[8] As discussed in detail by S. M. Rowland and others,[3] Between 1945 and 2020, the Cambrian undifferentiated dolomites have also been informally referred to as either the supra-Muav, Grand Wash Dolomite, and the Frenchman Mountain Dolostone.[3][9] The Cambrian undifferentiated dolomites was formally named the Frenchman Mountain Dolostone and restored to the Tonto Group.[1][3][9]
Description[edit]
In the Grand Canyon and using the informal name, Cambrian undifferentiated dolomites, E. D. McKee and C. E. Resser[8] recognized three types of dolostone within the Frenchman Mountain Dolostone. They are a white to buff, granular, hard, massive dolomite; a white to yellow, aphanitic (porcelain-textured), thin-bedded dolomite; and a steel-gray, fine-grained, thick-bedded dolomite. the Garnd Canyon, all of these dolomites are pervasively dolomitized to dolomicrite and the original textures obliterated beyond all recognition. The thin-bedded dolomite exhibits fine irregular laminae on weathered surfaces. The thick-bedded dolomite has olive, silty weathering surfaces and forms resistant cliffs. Thin layers of shale (mudstone) frequently separate dolomite beds, especially in the lower part of this formation.[3]
The dolomites of the Frenchman Mountain Dolostone distinctly differ in both lithology and weathering characteristics from the limestones and dolomites of the underlying Muav Limestone. Typically, limestones and dolomites at the top of the Muav Limestone are darker and more resistant to erosion than those at the base of the Frenchman Mountain Dolostone. These differences are why E. D. McKee and C. E. Resser recognized and mapped the Frenchman Mountain Dolostone as separate stratigraphic unit from the Muav Limestone.[3][8]
In the Lake Mead region and Frenchman Mountain, the dolomites of the Frenchman Mountain Dolostone consist of thick beds of oolitic grainstones and stromatolites that are interbedded with the fine-grained dolomites. These dolomites mostly retain their original sedimentary textures despite dolomitization. The sedimentary structures include wavy and asymmetric ripple laminations and small-scale cross-stratification. Trace fossils consist mainly of horizontal burrows and tracks.[3][8]
From a thickness of 1,217 feet (371 m) at Frenchman Mountain, the Frenchman Mountain Dolostone thins eastward to 1,188 feet (362 m) at Tramp Ridge in the Gold Butte National Monument and 890 feet (270 m) at Devils Cove in the Gold Butte National Monument. East of the Grand Wash fault and in the Grand Canyon region, its thickness decreases abruptly to 384 feet (117 m) at Quartermaster Canyon, 348 feet (106 m) at 269-Mile Canyon, and 230 feet (70 m) near Diamond Bar Ranch. Further eastward in the Grand Canyon region, the thickness of the Frenchman Mountain Dolostone gradually decreases to 171 feet (52 m) in Fern Glen Canyon. and 66 feet (20 m) at Blacktail Canyon. The abrupt change in its thickness on either side of the Grand Wash fault suggests that this fault was active during the Cambrian Period. In its eastern Grand Canyon (Marble Canyon), the Frenchman Mountain Dolostone is 98 feet (30 m) thick at 50-Mile and decreases to only being 26 feet (7.9 m) thick at Palisades of the Desert.[3]
Fossils[edit]
The Frenchman Mountain Dolostone lacks identifiable body fossils. On the other hand, trace fossils are commonly found in it. They consist of undescribed and unstudied, invertebrate horizontal burrows and trails.[10] None of these fossils are datable, so age of the Frenchman Mountain Dolostone cannot be determined from them.[3][9]
Depositional environment[edit]
Based upon sedimentary structures and stratigraphy, the Frenchman Mountain Dolostone is interpreted as shallow subtidal to possibly intertidal in depositional environments associated with a regressing sea.[2][3][4]
See also[edit]
External links[edit]
- Abbot, W, (2001) Revisiting the Grand Canyon – Through the Eyes of Seismic Sequence Stratigraphy. Search and Discovery Article # 40018, America Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
- Rowland, S. (nda) Frenchman Mountain and the Great Unconformity. Department of Geoscience, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada.
- Rowland, S. (ndb) Geologic Map of Frenchman Mountain. Department of Geoscience, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada.
- Stamm, N., 2023. Geologic Unit: Frenchman Mountain, U.S. Geologic Names Lexicon ("Geolex"), National Geologic Map Database, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia. Last accessed June 16, 2023.
References[edit]
- ^ a b c d e f Karlstrom, K.E., Mohr, M.T., Schmitz, M.D., Sundberg, F.A., Rowland, S.M., Blakey, R., Foster, J.R., Crossey, L.J., Dehler, C.M. and Hagadorn, J.W., 2020. Redefining the Tonto Group of Grand Canyon and recalibrating the Cambrian time scale. Geology, 48(5), pp. 425–430.
- ^ a b Korolev, V.S., 1997, Sequence stratigraphy, sedimentology, and correlation of the undifferentiated Cambrian dolomites of the Grand Canyon and Lake Mead area [M.S. thesis]. University of Nevada, Las Vegas, 178 p.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Rowland, S.M., Korolev, S., Hagadorn, J.W. and Ghosh, K., 2023. Frenchman Mountain Dolostone: A new formation of the Cambrian Tonto Group, Grand Canyon and Basin and Range, USA. Geosphere, 19(3), pp.719-747.
- ^ a b Middleton, L.T. and Elliott, D.K., 2003. Tonto Group, in Beus, S. S., and Morales, M., eds. Grand Canyon geology Museum of Northern Arizona Press, Flagstaff, Arizona. pp. 90–106.
- ^ Gilbert, G.K., 1875. Report upon the geology of portions of Nevada, Utah, California, and Arizona, Chapter 6. In Wheeler, G.M., ed., pp. 17–187, Report on the Geographical and Geological Explorations and Surveys West of the One Hundredth Meridian, vol. 3. U.S. Geological and Geographical Survey, Publication of the Wheeler Survey, Washington, D.C., 681 pp.
- ^ a b c Noble, L.F., 1914. The Shinumo quadrangle, Grand Canyon district, Arizona. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin. 549. doi:10.3133/B549. ISSN 0083-1093.
- ^ a b Noble, L.F., 1922. A section of the Paleozoic formations of the Grand Canyon at the Bass Trail. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin. 131-B, pp. 23–73
- ^ a b c d e McKee, E.D., and Resser, C.E., 1945, Cambrian history of the Grand Canyon region. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication 563, 168 pp.
- ^ a b c Connors, T.B., Tweet, J.S., and Santucci, V.L., 2020. Stratigraphy of Grand Canyon National Park. In: Santucci, V.L., Tweet, J.S., ed., pp. 54–74, Grand Canyon National Park: Centennial Paleontological Resource Inventory (Non-sensitive Version). Natural Resource Report NPS/GRCA/NRR—2020/2103. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado, 603 pp.
- ^ Miller, A.E., Marchetti, L., Francischini, H., Lucas, S.G., 2020. Paleozoic invertebrate ichnology of Grand Canyon national Park. In: Santucci, V.L., Tweet, J.S., ed., pp. 277–331, Grand Canyon National Park: Centennial Paleontological Resource Inventory (Non-sensitive Version). Natural Resource Report NPS/GRCA/NRR—2020/2103. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado, 603 pp.