Deepak Hegde

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Deepak Hegde
Hegde in a 2023 lecture
Born(1977-11-05)November 5, 1977[1]
Yellapur, India[1]
CitizenshipUnited States[1]
TitleSeymour Milstein Professor of Strategy
Professor of Management
Academic background
Alma materHaas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley
Academic work
DisciplineTechnological innovation,
Entrepreneurship,
Political economy and public policy
InstitutionsNew York University Stern School of Business
Websitewww.dhegde.com

Deepak Hegde (born November 5, 1977) is an Indian born American business scholar. He is the Seymour Milstein Professor of Strategy at the New York University, Stern School of Business.

Hegde is best known for his study of how innovation and entrepreneurship is shaped by public policy and private business practices. Notably he has offered evidence for the benefits of speedy approval and early publishing of patents. He has also studied multiple factors that impact entrepreneurship, including asymmetry of information on employee qualifications, the relevance of shared ethnic backgrounds, and bankruptcy protection regimes.

Hegde is also the founder and director of entrepreneurship programs notable for their practical pedagogy in helping real-life start-ups commercialize scientific innovations by bringing together scientists, business managers, and investors.

Biography[edit]

Early life and education[edit]

Hegde was born in Yellapur in Karnataka, India.[1] He graduated from the National Institute of Engineering in Karnataka in 2000 with a bachelor's degree in industrial engineering.[2] In 2004 he earned a master's degree in public policy from the Georgia Institute of Technology,[2] and in 2010 he completed his PhD in Business and Public Policy from the University of California, Berkeley.[3][4]

Hegde has credited professors David C. Mowery, Bronwyn Hall, and Bhaven Sampat, as mentors influential in his work.[3]

Academic career[edit]

Hegde joined the New York University's Stern School of Business as Professor of Management in 2010,[2][5] received tenure in 2016,[6] and became a full professor in 2020.[1][2] In 2023 he was appointed to the chaired professorship Seymour Milstein Professor of Strategy.[2][7]

Hegde has taught courses on business strategy, innovation, and entrepreneurship.[3][2][8][9] He has researched how entrepreneurs and innovators bring their ideas to market, especially within science and technology intensive industries.[2][3][9][4]

Hegde serves or has served in editorial positions at academic journals including the Journal of Economics & Management Strategy,[10] Organization Science,[11] Management Science,[12][13] and Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal.[14]

Hegde has also been a visiting scholar at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and subsequently was named Thomas Alva Edison Scholar to study how past policies have affected the USPTO patent quality metrics and the patent examination quality.[4]

Practical entrepreneurship programs[edit]

Since 2017 Hegde has launched multiple practical entrepreneurship programs at NYU, including the Endless Frontier Labs program in 2019. These programs are notable for their innovative pedagogy in helping real startups commercialize scientific and technological innovations, by bringing together the scientists who developed these innovations, business managers that can run the startups, and venture capitalists that can provide the necessary funding.[5][15][16][17][7][18][19]

Hegde is also the academic director of NYU's Berkley Center for Entrepreneurship, which provides education, coaching, and funding for startups.[20][2][7]

Awards and accolades[edit]

In 2012 Hegde was named a Kauffman Junior Faculty Fellow in Entrepreneurship Research – an award that recognized scholars who exhibit the potential to make significant contributions to the body of research in the field of entrepreneurship.[21]

In 2015 Hegde was listed among the top 40 MBA professors under the age of 40 by Poets & Quants.[3][22]

For his innovative pedagogy and impact on the practice of entrepreneurship, he received the 2018 NYU Stern School of Business Faculty Leadership Award,[19] and the 2022 Entrepreneurship Pedagogy Award by the Academy of Management.[18][19] Hegde has also received distinguished teaching awards.[23][19]

Notable research[edit]

Hegde at a university seminar presenting a paper (2023)

Hegde has studied the consequences of business practices and public policy on innovation and entrepreneurship.[3] His research on entrepreneurship notably showed that workers with skills greater than what their résumés suggest gravitate towards entrepreneurship.[24][25] Also that shared ethnic backgrounds among investors and entrepreneurs led to superior investment returns.[3][26][27] His innovation policy research offered evidence that speedy approval of a startup's first-time patent application significantly bolstered its growth and success;[28][29] that earlier publishing of patent applications lead to faster licensing, diffusion, and innovation;[30] and that increased complexity in the patent approval process put larger firms at an advantage over smaller ones.[31]

Entrepreneurship[edit]

Hegde found that individuals with skills greater than what their résumés show are undervalued by employers and gravitate towards entrepreneurship. He posited that employers assess potential workers based on their educational qualifications, especially early in their careers when there is little direct information on their work accomplishments and productivity. This leads those who correctly believe that they are better than their résumés show to become successful entrepreneurs.[24][25] This not only applies to high-tech entrepreneurs, but everyone who chooses to be self-employed.[25] The conclusion is that entrepreneurs have higher ability scores, lower levels of educational attainment, as well as greater and more variable earnings. This may explain why several groups with less credible ability signals, such as immigrants, gravitate toward entrepreneurship.[24][25]

Also, Hegde found that venture capitalists (VCs) are more likely to invest in startups with executives from the same ethnic background, and that when VCs and entrepreneurs shared the same ethnicity, startups were more successful.[3][26][27] This is likely not discrimination against others but instead reflect the benefits from closer VC-entrepreneur communication and coordination when they share the same ethnic background.[26][32][33]

Hegde also found that more bankruptcy protections for debtors led to shrinking investments and innovation. Higher levels of bankruptcy exemptions (debtor protections where some assets cannot be used to repay creditors in a bankruptcy), meant greater risks for investors, in turn lowering their levels of capital investment. That made firms (especially small ones and in industries with high costs of innovation) to cut back on innovation expenditures, resulting in fewer patents and lower overall patent quality.[34]

Patent approvals[edit]

Hegde found that the speedy approval of a startup's first-time patent application greatly bolstered its growth and success, with greater growth in revenue, employment, investor funding, and subsequent patent approvals. Conversely, the research also showed that when ultimately-approved patents experienced protracted review processes, those growth rates were significantly dampened.[28][29] Hegde posited that patents facilitate information sharing between potential investors and startups, and generate more investments to fuel their growth. Entrepreneurs can more openly share inventions without fear of being misappropriated. Investors can more confidently invest in firms that hold patents as those serve as indicators of greater quality and potential success.[28]

He also found that increased complexity in the patent approval process led to fewer approvals and put large firms at an advantage over small firms.[31] His research showed that applications filed by large firms were more likely to result in patents than those filed by small firms, suggesting it was getting more difficult for small companies to get patents, while large companies had both the financial resources and time to wait out the lengthy and costly approval process.[31]

Patent disclosures[edit]

Hegde also found that the earlier disclosure by the U.S Patent and Trademark Office of inventions through patent publication accelerated innovation.[30] He found that a change in policy, where publication was shortened from 3–4 years to 18 months, accelerated further patenting and innovation.

Hegde also found, contrary to common belief, that a majority of investors chose to opt out of secrecy and publicly reveal their patent applications while they were still pending, to reap the benefits of informing potential investors and licensees.[3][35][36] On the flip, side Hegde found that the least valuable and least-impactful patents were those that opted for pre-grant secrecy.[37]

Politics of disease research funding[edit]

Hegde tested the supposedly political independence of the grant-making activities of the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), tasked with funding disease research, through an independent and non-political peer-review system. Hegde nevertheless found that despite their merit-based aims, NIH grant decisions were skewed toward greater funding to rare disease research advocated by constituencies from states that had more members on the U.S House subcommittee with oversight of the NIH.[38][39][40]

The U.S. Congress aimed to curb the power of lobbyists through a 2010 ban on setting aside money in bills for specific projects, known as earmarks. In response, lobby groups shifted strategies, seeking to steer funds using ‘soft’ earmarks: language in spending bills that encourages or urges an agency to perform some action, such as funding Alzheimer's research, rather than setting aside funds for it.[38][41]

Publications[edit]

This is a dynamic list and may never be able to satisfy particular standards for completeness. You can help by adding missing items with reliable sources.

Selected journal articles[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c d e "Deepak Hegde - Curriculum Vitae" (PDF). stern.nyu.edu. New York University. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2023-05-31.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h "NYU Faculty: Deepak Hegde". New York University. 2023. Archived from the original on 2023-05-31.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Baron, Ethan (April 16, 2015). "2015 Best 40 Under 40 Professors: Deepak Hegde, Stern School". poetsandquants.com. Archived from the original on 2015-04-23.
  4. ^ a b c Lee, Michelle K. (September 16, 2014). "The latest from USPTO leadership - Expanded 2014 Edison Scholars Program to Focus on Litigation Issues". uspto.gov. United States Patent and Trademark Office. Archived from the original on 2023-02-01.
  5. ^ a b Lebowitz, Shana; Shibu, Sherin; Reuter, Dominick (January 3, 2020). "How to scale a startup and avoid common pitfalls, according to founders and investors who have done it". Business Insider. Archived from the original on 2020-06-12. Deepak Hegde, associate professor of management and organizations at New York University. Hegde also directs Endless Frontier Labs, which helps technology and science startups scale
  6. ^ "NYU Faculty: Deepak Hegde (2016)". New York University. 2016. Archived from the original on 2016-11-02.
  7. ^ a b c Bleizeffer, Kristy (February 5, 2024). "In NYU Stern's Endless Frontier Labs, MBAs Help Bring Science & Tech Ideas To Market". Poets&Quants.
  8. ^ Lestch, Corinne (October 30, 2017). "NYU Stern School of Business to launch first 'Creative Destruction Lab' in U.S. - The lab, set to launch next year, will nurture early-stage startups developing science and technology-based products". edscoop.com. Archived from the original on 2017-11-04.
  9. ^ a b Nugent, Thomas (October 16, 2017). "The 6 Best Startup Cities For MBA Entrepreneurs—Outside Silicon Valley". BusinessBecause.com. Archived from the original on 2022-07-04.
  10. ^ "Journal of Economics & Management Strategy - Editors". Journal of Economics & Management Strategy. 31 (4): 785. Winter 2022. doi:10.1111/jems.12436. ISSN 1058-6407.
  11. ^ "Editorial Board". Organization Science. 26 (6): 1553–C2. November–December 2015. doi:10.1287/orsc.2015.eb.v266. ISSN 1047-7039. Archived from the original on 2022-12-04.
  12. ^ "2016 Reviewers and Guest Associate Editors". Management Science. 63 (2): 585. February 2017. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2017.2723. ISSN 0025-1909.
  13. ^ "Editorial Board". Management Science. 68 (1): iv–v. January 2022. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2022.eb.v68n1. ISSN 0025-1909. S2CID 246303879.
  14. ^ "Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal - Editors". Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal. 16 (4): 669. December 2022. doi:10.1002/sej.1449. eISSN 1526-5501. ISSN 1932-4391. S2CID 254097452.
  15. ^ "Endless Frontier Labs at New York University's Stern School of Business Paves the Way for Science-based Startups". NYU Stern School of Business. July 15, 2019. Archived from the original on 2022-12-04.
  16. ^ The Princeton Review Staff (November 15, 2022). "Top 50 Best Graduate Programs for Entrepreneurs in 2023 - The Princeton Review and Entrepreneur have again partnered to rank the top programs for studying entrepreneurship as a graduate student". Entrepreneur. Archived from the original on 2022-12-04.
  17. ^ Bhatia, Ashish K.; Levina, Natalia (August 7, 2020). "Can Entrepreneurship Be Taught in a Classroom?". Harvard Business Review. Archived from the original on 2023-03-26.
  18. ^ a b Academy of Management Entrepreneurship Division (2022). "Entrepreneurship Pedagogy Award 2022". Academy of Management. Archived from the original on 2022-12-05. Short description of the Entrepreneurship Pedagogy Award: The purpose of the award is to encourage not only innovations in pedagogy but also the dissemination of such innovations. Criteria for evaluation of nominations included (1.) the innovativeness and novelty of the content and pedagogical process; (2.) the demonstrated and potential impact and transferability; and (3.) the course's relevance (e.g., actionable lessons for entrepreneurs, addresses a social need).
  19. ^ a b c d "Faculty Awards and Recognition". NYU Stern School of Business. Archived from the original on 2023-02-13. Selected Recent Awards and Recognitions
    Some recent awards and other notable forms of recognition received by members of our department include: (...)
    DEEPAK HEGDE
    2022 Academy of Management Innovation in Pedagogy Award, Entrepreneurship Division
    2022 NYU Stern School of Business Distinguished Teaching Award for Pedagogical Innovation
    2018 NYU Stern School of Business Faculty Leadership Award
  20. ^ "NYU Stern $300K Entrepreneurs Challenge Gives Victorious Teams Pathway to Market". americanentrepreneurship.com. June 24, 2020. Archived from the original on 2022-12-07.
  21. ^ "Kauffman Junior Faculty Fellows (2012)". kauffman.org. Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation. 2020. Archived from the original on 2020-08-08. The Kauffman Foundation established the Kauffman Junior Faculty Fellowship in Entrepreneurship Research in 2008 to recognize tenured or tenure-track junior faculty members at accredited U.S. universities who are beginning to establish a record of scholarship and exhibit the potential to make significant contributions to the body of research in the field of entrepreneurship.
  22. ^ Carter, Andrea; Baron, Ethan (April 20, 2015). "The 10 top B-school professors under 40". Fortune. Archived from the original on 2022-11-28.
  23. ^ "University Distinguished Teaching Awards - 2022-2023 DTA Winners". New York University. May 2023. Archived from the original on 2023-05-28. Established in 1987, the Distinguished Teaching Award (DTA) highlights New York University's commitment to teaching excellence and is given annually to selected outstanding members of the faculty.
  24. ^ a b c d Hy, Khe (April 17, 2018). "An alternative theory of why entrepreneurs do what they do". qz.com. Quartz. Archived from the original on 2021-06-22.
  25. ^ a b c d e Blank, Steve (April 18, 2018). "Steve Blank: The Unexpected Reason Why People Start Their Own Companies - A controversial study suggests that people become entrepreneurs because they realize they're worth more than their resumes". Inc. Archived from the original on 2019-05-02.
  26. ^ a b c d "Venture Capitalists' Ethnic Favoritism Pays Off for Them". Harvard Business Review. 2014. Archived from the original on 2022-12-03.
  27. ^ a b c "Are CEO appointments in India caste/religion biased?". Forbes India. September 14, 2018. Archived from the original on 2023-03-22.
  28. ^ a b c d Hartline, Devlin (January 6, 2016). "How Patents Help Startups Grow, Innovate, and Succeed". gmu.edu. George Mason University. Archived from the original on 2023-03-26.
  29. ^ a b c Lloyd, Richard (January 25, 2016). "US start-up employment and sales growth rates boosted by patents, new research reveals". iam-media.com. AIM-Media. Archived from the original on 2022-08-16.
  30. ^ a b Larrimore Ouellette, Lisa; Risch, Michael; Hrdy, Camilla (May 1, 2018). "Measuring the Value of Patent Disclosure". writtendescription.blogspot.com. Written Description. Archived from the original on 2018-07-11.
  31. ^ a b c d Quittner, Jeremy (July 25, 2014). "A New Study on Patents Confirms the Obvious: Big Businesses Have the Upper Hand - A new study shows a precipitous drop in patent grants over the years. That's bad news for you". Inc. Archived from the original on 2022-12-04.
  32. ^ Welter, Patrick (March 20, 2014). "Ein Lob der Vielfalt" [A Tribute to Diversity]. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (in German). Archived from the original on 2022-08-15.
  33. ^ "Venture capitalists' ethnic favouritism". Dawn. July 7, 2014. Archived from the original on 2023-01-23.
  34. ^ a b Seamans, Robert (June 6, 2017). "Universal Basic Income Is Not An Innovation Policy". Forbes. Archived from the original on 2022-11-14.
  35. ^ a b c d Williams, Heidi L. (January 2017). "How Do Patents Affect Research Investments?" (PDF). NBER Working Paper Series. 9 (23088). National Bureau of Economic Research: 441–469. doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-110216-100959. hdl:1721.1/114175. PMC 5664960. PMID 29104716. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2022-06-30.
  36. ^ a b c Crass, Dirk; Garcia Valero, Francisco; Pitton, Francesco; Rammer, Christian (March 14, 2019). "Protecting Innovation Through Patents and Trade Secrets: Evidence for Firms with a Single Innovation". International Journal of the Economics of Business. 26 (1 - Intellectual Property: Strategy, Measurement, and Economic Performance): 117–156. doi:10.1080/13571516.2019.1553291. hdl:10419/225073. S2CID 159125228.
  37. ^ Wasserman, Shawn (January 27, 2015). "How Tight Lipped are Inventors with IP? - Did the AIPA help or hinder small inventors? Did it reduce patent quality?". Engineering.com.
  38. ^ a b c Reardon, Sara (November 6, 2014). "Lobbying sways NIH grants - Pressure on lawmakers from patient-advocacy groups has shaped agency spending on rare-disease research" (PDF). Nature. 515 (7525): 19. doi:10.1038/515019a. PMID 25373655. S2CID 4472016. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2022-12-04.
  39. ^ a b Silverman, Ed (November 13, 2014). "How Lobbying for Rare Disease Research Influences Congress and NIH". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 2020-10-27.
  40. ^ Gitlin, Jonathan M. (December 18, 2008). "New paper suggests politics influence NIH grant distribution". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on 2022-12-04.
  41. ^ a b Brainard, Jeffrey (December 19, 2008). "Congress Steers NIH Grants to Favored Colleges, Despite Merit-Based Reviews". The Chronicle of Higher Education. Archived from the original on 2022-12-04.
  42. ^ Lerner, Josh; Seru, Amit (June 2022). "The Use and Misuse of Patent Data: Issues for Finance and Beyond". The Review of Financial Studies. 35 (6): 2700. doi:10.1093/rfs/hhab084.

External links[edit]

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Deepak Hegde.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Deepak_Hegde&oldid=1221397369"